This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animals in media, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Animals in mediaWikipedia:WikiProject Animals in mediaTemplate:WikiProject Animals in mediaAnimals in media articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sports, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sport-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SportsWikipedia:WikiProject SportsTemplate:WikiProject Sportssports articles
Assess : newly added and existing articles, maybe nominate some good B-class articles for GA; independently assess some as A-class, regardless of GA status.
Cleanup : * Sport governing body (this should-be-major article is in a shameful state) * Field hockey (History section needs sources and accurate information - very vague at the moment.) * Standardize Category:American college sports infobox templates to use same font size and spacing. * Sport in the United Kingdom - the Popularity section is incorrect and unsourced. Reliable data is required.
* Fix project template and/or "to do list" Current version causes tables of content to be hidden unless/until reader chooses "show."
This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject 20th Century Studios, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 20th Century Studios and its affiliated companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.20th Century StudiosWikipedia:WikiProject 20th Century StudiosTemplate:WikiProject 20th Century Studios20th Century Studios articles
Latest comment: 6 months ago10 comments8 people in discussion
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Oppose because if we have phonetically indistinguishable and easily-switched-around Ocean's 11 and Ocean's Eleven per WP:SMALLDETAILS consensus, then this setup is fine. Disambiguation is about technical sortability (beyond whatever primary topic could be determined). There is no other film just called Turbo to technically break out "(film)" further here. All we need to do is make sure the details are there for when a reader looks for the topic. Turbo (film) already has the short description and the hatnote, and I just expanded the films' descriptions on the disambiguation page here. Erik (talk | contrib) (ping me)17:44, 16 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose. I'm not an expert on the somewhat obscure 1997 film, but I don't think this is a good test case for applicability of subtitles. Some films have vestigial subtitles that aren't that important (Dr. Strangelove) and some films have the subtitle a key part of how the film is referred to (Captain America: The Winter Soldier). I get the impression that 1997's Turbo: A Power Rangers Movie is closer to the Captain America: The Winter Soldier example where the subtitle is important and part of how the film is talked/written about. (If it was closer to the Dr. Strangelove case where the subtitle wasn't that important, then a move would have more merit, IMO.) SnowFire (talk) 20:42, 16 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
Weak support per Tassedethe. I'm still not sold on the argument concerning the 1997 film, but judging by the budget, the 2024 film Turbo appears to be a major production and not a small indie film. While ideally we'd wait a little just in case the 2024 film ends up stuck in development hell and isn't actually released, this is pretty unlikely, so eh, probably safe to just move this article now. SnowFire (talk) 15:52, 21 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose per page views: the Power Rangers movie has 7.1k, while this article has 31.3k. Even without considering the usage of page views, this film is generally more notable than the other.
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
