 | This article is written in Indian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, analysed, defence) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
| While the biographies of living persons policy does not apply directly to the subject of this article, it may contain material that relates to living persons, such as friends and family of persons no longer living, or living persons involved in the subject matter. Unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material about living persons must be removed immediately. If such material is re-inserted repeatedly, or if there are other concerns related to this policy, please see this noticeboard. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg)
Extend page protection?
editThe page was pending-change-protected from late November to late December.
A check of non-logged-in-user edits for the last week or show shows that the vast majority were repeat insertions of the same name, edits which were reverted.
Should the page continue to be pending-change protected? If there are enough page-watchers that the edits are reverted within an hour and the vandalism drops to less than once or twice a week, I think the answer may be "no." Otherwise the answer is probably "yes." What do the rest of you think? davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 15:10, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
The page should be protected. People are just adding the roles of casts whether they are villain or not. Just protect the page. Tushar06my19971 (talk) 01:40, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
Biography of living persons policy
editI added {{BLPO}} to the top of this talk page because in the recent past editors have added content about actors or other people involved in the film which violated Wikipedia's biography of living persons policy. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 15:13, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
The poster
editSorry I was confused about the poster and I upload another poster the Rangoon poster plllzzz help me to clear this confusing and fix this problem , and add it to Rangoon (2016 film ) not Udta punjab ,,, and tnnxx a lot ,, sorry sorry again .. Hind Jaabit (talk) 14:26, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
Online piracy issue: Torrent links of the clip have not deleted
editThe information of "However, according to NDTV, the producers of the film had managed to remove the copies from various sites like Kickass Torrents and The Pirate Bay.[17]" is baseless. As the torrents still exists on those sites. The News article reference does not make sense as the torrents still exists on those sites HotWick (talk) 06:46, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
- It may be right, but the authoritative source says otherwise. I would suggest you to edit the information IF you have a better source. Cheers, Nairspecht Converse 07:11, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
Random information
editIn this edit I removed a sentence that has little bearing on the progress of the story. It's a random piece of information that sounds more like a description of an opening shot, rather than a description of a plot detail that enhances our understanding of the story. This content was restored by Imbunty with no explanation, so he is welcome to explain how this detail enhances our comprehension of the plot. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 20:12, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
- It's the opening sequence of the film. I believe it has some significance because a character (played by Bhatt) has direct relation with this sequence. Alas, the way it is described makes it too generic. Perhaps, someone could paraphrase it. Cheers, Nairspecht Converse 05:53, 22 June 2016 (UTC)
- Hi Nairspecht, thanks for the reply. If there's some relevance to the scene that impacts our understanding of the story, then I would endorse its inclusion, but right now it's just "This happens. Meanwhile, there's a DJ with a drug problem." Huh? I haven't seen the film, so I can't contribute any alternatives, but to someone like me who hasn't seen them film, it's meaningless. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 17:56, 22 June 2016 (UTC)
- Let me see if I can expand it. Give me 24 hours. Best, Nairspecht Converse 06:12, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
- It's done, mate. Let me know if you have any queries. Cheers, Nairspecht Converse
- Let me see if I can expand it. Give me 24 hours. Best, Nairspecht Converse 06:12, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
- Hi Nairspecht, thanks for the reply. If there's some relevance to the scene that impacts our understanding of the story, then I would endorse its inclusion, but right now it's just "This happens. Meanwhile, there's a DJ with a drug problem." Huh? I haven't seen the film, so I can't contribute any alternatives, but to someone like me who hasn't seen them film, it's meaningless. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 17:56, 22 June 2016 (UTC)