Talk:Ursula Brunner

Ursula Brunner is currently a Politics and government good article nominee. Nominated by YuniToumei (talk) at 17:27, 26 July 2026 (UTC)

This article is ready to be reviewed in accordance with the good article criteria. Any editor who has not nominated or contributed significantly to this article may review the article and decide if it should be listed as a good article. To start the review process, click start review and then save the page. See the instructions.

Note: Happy to provide copies of offline sources for the reviewer :) YuniToumei (talk) 15:20, 7 September 2026 (UTC)

Biography: Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Switzerland Low‑importance

	Switzerland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Switzerland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Switzerland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwitzerlandWikipedia:WikiProject SwitzerlandTemplate:WikiProject SwitzerlandSwitzerland
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women in Red: Artists+Activists (2026)

This article was created or improved during the Artists+Activists edit-a-thon hosted by the Women in Red project in March 2026. The editor(s) involved may be new; please assume good faith regarding their contributions before making changes.Women in RedWikipedia:WikiProject Women in RedTemplate:WikiProject Women in RedWomen in Red

‹ The template below (WikiProject Food and drink) is being considered for merging with WikiProject Michelin Guide. See templates for discussion to help reach a consensus. ›

Food and drink Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Food and Drink task list:

To edit this page, select here

Here are some tasks you can do for WikiProject Food and drink:

Help bring these Top Importance articles currently B Status or below up to GA status: Agaricus bisporus (i.e. mushroom), Beef, Bread, Curry, Drink, Food, Ham and eggs, Soy sauce, Sushi, Yogurt
Bring these Top Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Beer, French cuisine, Sugar
Bring these High Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Apple, Burger King, Fish
Participate in project-related deletion discussions.
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
Provide photographs and images for Category:Wikipedia requested images of food
Consider joining this project's Assessment task force. List any project ideas in this section

Note: These lists are transcluded from the project's tasks pages.

A fact from Ursula Brunner appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 30 March 2026 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that a "banana woman" opposed a "banana miracle"?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Did you know archive/2026/March. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Ursula Brunner.

Wikipedia

Did you know nomination

Latest comment: 5 months ago3 comments3 people in discussion

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. You can locate your hook here. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 10:18, 24 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

... that a "Banana woman" opposed Migros' "banana miracle"? Source: Zaslawski (2025) in NZZ: (text in german. email me for a copy if you need access to review it)
- ALT0a: ... that a "Banana woman" opposed the "banana miracle" of Switzerland's largest retail company?
- ALT1: ... that Ursula Brunner influenced retailers to apply a surcharge on bananas with the proceeds going to aid organisations in the countries of origin? Source: Kennedy (2015), p.24 (text in german)
- Reviewed:
- Comment: Please note that this article was part of a move conflict on 8 of March, which breaks the DYK check script, making it look like the article has been around since October last year when I originally created the draft. The revision in which it was actually moved to mainspace can be found here. You can ask the involved admins for more info. And thanks to User:TarnishedPath for ALT1!

Created by YuniToumei (talk). Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has fewer than 5 past nominations.

YuniToumei (talk) 16:36, 14 March 2026 (UTC).Reply

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

QPQ: None required.

Overall:

Hook fact is cited, AGF. I think ALT0a works best, as it contextualizes the issue while still maintaining the banana play. Copyvio tool doesn't work very well on German sources, but it finds no issues in German. I don't see anything problematic spotchecking with Google Translate. Looks good. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 18:33, 14 March 2026 (UTC)Reply