Talk:Vedalam
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Semi-protected edit request on 12 November 2015
editThis edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Vedalam declared Diseaster of the year. AM Rathnam Who the producer of the movie feared about the fake boxoffice collection and he already informed about the current situation of the movie/</ref> Itsbalaa (talk) 08:55, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
- I think we should wait for figures later on. Stickee (talk) 01:25, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
References
Semi-protected edit request on 13 November 2015
editThis edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
The running time of the movie should contain 148 minutes alone. Review of the movie is present in the Running time. This needs to be removed. Smariappan (talk) 07:13, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 15 November 2015
editThis edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Respected Sir, I am VETRI cinematographer of the movie VEDALAM,I want remove the additonal cinematography credit given in cinematography column. Thanking you VETRI
Vetripalanisamy (talk) 11:28, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
- Hi Vetripalanisamy , Please justify your request. Why do you believe that the additional credit must not be given / included in Wikipedia. --RAT -.- Poke it 13:18, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
- Not done for now: - please reactivate the request once you have cited reliable sources - Arjayay (talk) 21:25, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 15 November 2015
editThis edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
PLEASE CHANGE THE FOLLOWING TEXT
Box office
But fell just behind Kaththi and Lingaa worldwide[37]
TO
DELETE THIS LINE. THE CITATION NO.37 HAS AN ARTICLE DESCRIBING A DIFFERENT MOVIE WHICH IF USED IN THIS ARTICLE, IS AN ERRONEOUS CLAIM.
SBharathChennai (talk) 11:52, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
- : Done --RAT -.- Poke it 13:18, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 17 November 2015
editThis edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
"Sify gave the film a highly positive rating of 4/5 stars…" (THIS IS INCORRECT)
There's a slight misinformation under the CRITICAL RECEPTION section. Sify did not give the film a rating of 4/5. Sify gave the film a verdict of 'AVERAGE'. The '4/5' rating was a rating given by users, which is obviously biased. Please change the rating to "Average" or include the fact that Sify gave the film a verdict of AVERAGE while the users gave an average rating of 4/5. Thanks.
SOURCE: [1]
HeyRam123 (talk) 16:27, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
- Done I have explained this was an "average user rating" of 4/5, but a verdict of "Average" and I have also removed the "highly" from "Highly positive ratings" - Arjayay (talk) 19:18, 22 November 2015 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 18 November 2015
editThis edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Vedalam Joins The 100 Crore Club In 8 Days confirms Rahul Dev and later he tweets it's a fake article from 'ajith fan'
Jittho (talk) 12:44, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
- Not done The article already states it took 106 crore in 11 days - Arjayay (talk) 19:20, 22 November 2015 (UTC)
Gross/Box Office
editHi,
It has been confirmed by Rahul Dev via Twitter that movie has entered 100 crore club. Please update the same. Reference Link-http://www.belvoireagle.com/entertainment/ajiths-vedalamto-100-cr-club-9998.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by 103.53.234.138 (talk) 07:40, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 19 November 2015
editThis edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please edit the CRITICAL RECEPTION section. SIFY gave the film a rating of AVERAGE not 4/5. The film did not receive "Highly Positive Ratings".
HeyRam123 (talk) 16:24, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
- Partly done It gave an "average user rating" of 4/5, but a verdict of "Average" and I have also removed the "highly" from "Highly positive ratings" - Arjayay (talk) 19:16, 22 November 2015 (UTC)
SIFY did not give the film 4/5. Please edit the Critical Reception section.
editHi,
I'm here to point out a slight misinformation under the Critical Reception section. SIFY did not give the film a rating of 4/5. The truth is that SIFY gave the film a rating of AVERAGE. The Film did not get "Highly Positive Reviews". If you do the math (by grouping all the ratings together) it's obvious that the film got ratings between 'mixed to positive'. Please edit the section. — Preceding unsigned comment added by HeyRam123 (talk • contribs) 16:31, 19 November 2015 (UTC) --118.102.129.98 (talk) 07:11, 20 November 2015 (UTC)Çores
Semi-protected edit request on 24 November 2015
editThis edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Box Office source is not an official source please check regarding this Manaz123123 (talk) 13:17, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
- Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format. Edgars2007 (talk/contribs) 11:04, 26 November 2015 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 24 November 2015
editThis edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Vedalam Producer AM Rathnam explains "There are a lot of ignorant people talking on the internet about 100 crores, 200 crores etc. I doubt, whether they know much about what gross or net or share is, and also about the various stakeholders involved".
Jittho (talk) 14:31, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
- Not done: as you have not requested a specific change in the form "Please replace XXX with YYY" or "Please add ZZZ between PPP and QQQ".
More importantly, you have not cited reliable sources to back up your request, without which no information should be added to, or changed in, any article. - Arjayay (talk) 16:30, 29 November 2015 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 2 December 2015
editThis edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
please change sori theme to theri theme 117.223.182.21 (talk) 17:10, 2 December 2015 (UTC)
- Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. --Stabila711 (talk) 19:55, 2 December 2015 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 3 December 2015
editThis edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
please change the sori theme to theri theme in soundtrack
61.2.73.18 (talk) 08:22, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
- Not done: as you have not cited reliable sources to back up your request, without which no information should be added to, or changed in, any article. - Arjayay (talk) 08:59, 4 December 2015 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 4 December 2015
editThis edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Copypaste of entire article removed
Not done - As it clearly states in the instructions to submit an edit request:-
"Please don't copy the entire article into the request. Only copy the part you're changing. If you copy the entire article into the request, you'll break navigation on the talk page, and another editor may remove your entire request."
This is not a "spot the difference competition" If you want to suggest a change, please request this in the form "Please replace XXX with YYY" or "Please add ZZZ between PPP and QQQ".
Please also cite reliable sources to back up your request, without which no information should be added to, or changed in, any article. - Arjayay (talk) 08:58, 4 December 2015 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 19 December 2015
editThis edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Better plot story. 108.94.33.132 (talk) 16:13, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
- Not done: as you have not requested a specific change in the form "Please replace XXX with YYY" or "Please add ZZZ between PPP and QQQ". - Arjayay (talk) 16:31, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 29 February 2016
editThis edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
need change vedalam total boxoffice 125.78 crores http://www.ibtimes.co.in/vedalam-total-box-office-collection-ajith-starrer-grosses-rs-125-7-crore-lifetime-668786
Ezhil1992 (talk) 15:37, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
- Partly done: Ezhil1992 - Please double-check your request next time. Source doesn't say 125.78, it says 125.7. That unsourced hundredths decimal would be enough to round up to 125.8, which would result in an inaccuracy. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:01, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
Vedhalam Gross is 139 Crores....
editThis edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Vedhalam worldwide Total Gross is 139 Crores
Trulok (talk) 06:10, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
- Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format. B E C K Y S A Y L E S 06:04, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
- Further, Trulok, boanalyst.website doesn't qualify as a reliable published source with an established reputation for fact-checking and clear editorial oversight. Any monkey with an internet connection can set up a blog and claim to be an expert in Indian cinema financials. See WP:UGC. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 06:19, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 7 April 2016
editThis edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
box office=200
Sana.fl samuel12 (talk) 06:27, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
- Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. — JJMC89 (T·C) 06:33, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
I want official source on vedalam 125.7cr collection report.
editIf you have source show me... Vijayenterking (talk) 04:13, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
- Vijayenterking, the data is being supported by this reference. If you're asking about something more specific, you should probably elaborate. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 04:24, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
Please remove
editPlease remove the unwanted & fake added that the movie was official remake of sarath kumar aei movie.. Its fake remove it immediately. Aroos sharees (talk) 19:29, 24 November 2018 (UTC)
- @Aroos sharees: Done, not because you're hostile about it's removal, but because the content is unsourced. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 20:57, 24 November 2018 (UTC)
Total collection 125.7cr
editThe movie life time gross is 125.7cr check below link...
https://www.ibtimes.co.in/vedalam-total-box-office-collection-ajith-starrer-grosses-rs-125-7-crore-lifetime-668786 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sharees mohammed (talk • contribs) 10:18, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
- That IBtimes article reporting andhraboxoffice figures (Non-reliable source). Panda619 (talk) 16:39, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
Box office
editIn that 101 article , vedalam collected over 50crs in tn not world wide , and it's worldwide collection in six days is 80crs , it is as per the article mentioned already by you guys only 2409:4072:90D:CDC4:0:0:E52:D8B1 (talk) 09:03, 5 March 2024 (UTC)