Talk:Verghese Kurien

Untitled

You could also mention the e-mail id of Dr Kurien. One likes to get in touch with great people like him He is very great man for india — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.211.128.93 (talk) 04:37, 25 November 2013 (UTC)

Added category

Added category Malayali people.--71.30.177.228 08:29, 29 October 2006 (UTC) he was a great guy.... —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 59.161.41.96 (talk) 09:13, August 20, 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Dr v kurien.jpg

Image:Dr v kurien.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 19:44, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Verghese Kurien. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130426131554/http://www.hindustantimes.com/India-news/Ahmedabad/India-largest-milk-producing-nation-in-2010-11-NDDB/Article1-785018.aspx to http://www.hindustantimes.com/India-news/Ahmedabad/India-largest-milk-producing-nation-in-2010-11-NDDB/Article1-785018.aspx
• Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/6U68ulwpb to http://mha.nic.in/sites/upload_files/mha/files/LST-PDAWD-2013.pdf
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://indairyasso.org/magazine/sept12/legend.pdf
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://indairyasso.org/magazine/sept12/legend.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:57, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Verghese Kurien. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://indairyasso.org/magazine/sept12/legend.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140714164443/http://www.drkurien.com/achievement.html to http://www.drkurien.com/achievement.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:09, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

This page is not neutral. NPOV?

The content and language of this page does not follow Wikipedia's NPOV (Neutral Point of View) guidelines. It aggrandises the subject and is laudatory rather than objective. It places value judgements on history consistently, without offering context for it. Manicmarvin (talk) 04:59, 3 December 2018 (UTC)

Copyeditor passing by

Did a significant rehaul of this article. While I tried to reword all of the content, some of it (like Manicmarvin pointed out) was incredibly not neutral in tone. As such I have deleted those passages. It should be more in place on Wikipedia. —Tenryuu 🐲 ( 💬 • 📝 ) 06:10, 15 July 2020 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

• Dr. Verghese Kurien.jpg

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 23:52, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Rosetta (restaurant)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Magentic Manifestations (talk · contribs) 13:33, 10 January 2024 (UTC)

Reviewer: That Tired Tarantula (talk · contribs) 06:44, 26 June 2024 (UTC)

Hi, I'll be reviewing this article during this week. That Tired Tarantula^Burrow 05:53, 3 July 2024 (UTC)

@That Tired Tarantula Thanks for taking this up. Will address the comments as they come. Magentic Manifestations (talk) 08:31, 3 July 2024 (UTC)

Good Article review progress box Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV () 3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant () Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

First look

Criteria

• No maintenance templates: Y
• Relavent images are present: Y
• No recent edit wars: Y
• Nominator is a signifcant contributor: Y

Copyright

• No copyright violations/plagiarism: There's one sentence in the lead and nationwide expansion section ("In 1979, he founded the Institute of Rural Management Anand (IRMA) to groom managers for the cooperatives.") that's copied from the Hindustan Times, so it needs to be reworded. Other than that, there's no copyvios. Y
• Images are free (unless a rationale is given if they are not) and tagged: * Images are free (unless a rationale is given if they are not) and tagged: In the last two images' rationales (which need to be tagged as having rationales, because currently, there's a rationale given, but there's a tag on the files with instructions for adding how a rationale has been given in a template), it says that the images should be used to represent a gathering of individuals who are deceased and for whom there is no known representation under a free license, but there is an image similar to the second image in the article that is under a CC license in Commons, so using the image that is currently in the article violates fair use.

I am bit confused. If my understanding is right, as it states that "and for whom there is no known representation under a 'free' license" and there is an another image, it violates the copyright, right? So, I will remove the image and that will solve the problem?