Talk:Wahiduddin Khan

Rewrite

Like Maulana Naeem Siddiqui,Dr. Israr Ahmad and Jave ahmad Ghamidi,Maulana Wahiduddin Khan also worked closely with Maulana Syed Abul Ala Maududi (alternative spelling Syed Maudoodi; often referred to as Maulana Maududi) (1903–1979).This article needs to be rewritten to conform to the standards of an encyclopedia. At present the page looks more like a fansite. -Exucmember (talk) 06:31, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

References

References

Hello, the references given here are not appropriate. For example the first reference from the web does not give any page (page not found). It (and the contents as well) should be removed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.155.190.206 (talk) 08:10, 26 July 2009 (UTC)

Controversial Statements

In the July, August, and October issues of his al-Risala journal, as well as his famous articles entitled Uswa-e-Hasana and Qayamat ka Alarm, he states the following beliefs of his: - That the “uswah” (example) of the Prophet Muhammad is NOT “kaamil” (perfect/complete). - Prophet Muhammad is NOT the “final model” with regards to “minhaaj” (model/example/pattern). - To believe that the Prophet Muhammad is a “kaamil model” (complete model) is UNNATURAL (“ghayr fiTri”), INAPPLICABLE (“ghayr `amli”), and UN-ISLAMIC (“ghayr Islami”). - The minhaaj (model/example/pattern) of Jesus Christ is MORE applicable for Muslims to follow today than the minhaaj/uswah (path/model) of the Prophet Muhammad. - Prophet `Isa will NOT be physically returning back to earth again. - Prophet `Isa is the same personality as al-Mahdi, i.e. they are NOT two different individuals. - There is NO concept of a physical being known as "l-Mahdi" who will be physically coming at the end of times. - Al-Dajjaal will NOT be a physical being but only an ideology. - Prophet `Isa will NOT physically kill al-Dajjaal.

The aforementioned beliefs led to a fatwa (edict) issued by Dar al-`Ulum al-Madania wherein it was stated that such beliefs are outside of Sunni Orthodox Islam.

Both Wahiduddin Khan and representatives of his al-Risala organization were questioned about such beliefs but no official response was given. Ayk1399 (talk) 22:42, 20 June 2011 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 5 January 2018

Delete duplicate "has" in sentence: "He has has written a book on the issue of blasphemy from a dissenting perspective." in section "Publications". 82.1.122.99 (talk) 00:14, 5 January 2018 (UTC)

Done –72 (talk) 00:56, 5 January 2018 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 27 March 2021

add this sentence "He has contributed articles to the magazine Organiser." Embed this link to the word Organiser, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Organiser_(magazine) Asten9899 (talk) 22:46, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. --Volteer1 (talk) 02:36, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

• Maulana Wahiduddin Khan.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 00:52, 25 March 2022 (UTC)

The Vision of Islam

The ISSN given in the reference for The Vision of Islam is actually an ISBN See: [1].

Please replace the citation with

{{cite book | title=The Vision of Islam | author = Maulana Wahiduddin Khan | date = 2014 | publisher = Goodword Books Pvt. Ltd. | isbn = 9788178989945 | url=https://www.cpsglobal.org/books/vision-islam }}

Thank you 76.14.122.5 (talk) 05:04, 30 December 2022 (UTC)

 Done Lemonaka (talk) 16:40, 30 December 2022 (UTC)