 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
Requested move
edit- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
No consensus to move. Vegaswikian (talk) 23:26, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
 | See also Talk:Woman on top (sex position)#Move? |
Woman on Top → Woman on Top (film) — There is a DAB page at Woman on top - (just a change of letter case!) this title makes it rather confusing. The problem was highlighted at Talk:Woman_on_top_(sex_position)#Move.3F. Ronhjones (Talk) 23:17, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
- Support Makes a much clearer disambig -- Boing! said Zebedee 23:34, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose as unnecessary precision. Anyone searching for Woman on Top, obviously a proper noun, is very likely looking for the movie (as opposed to someone searching for woman on top, who should be redirected directly to the sex position article). The dab page is brand new and completely unnecessary for only two articles; hatnotes on each are all that is needed to avoid any possible confusion. Station1 (talk) 04:45, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
- Disambig page Woman on top now has 3 choices. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 05:07, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
- The third entry does not meet the guidelines at MOS:DAB as it links two articles neither of which could be titled "Woman on top" nor do they even use the phrase anywhere in the article. At most, they might be in a "See also" section of a "Woman on top (disambiguation)" page, but woman on top (sex position) is very clearly the primary use of the lower-case phrase. Station1 (talk) 05:32, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose per WP:Naming conventions (capitalization)#Page names that only differ by capitalization. The existing dab page and hatnote seem to handle the problem of searches intended for the sex position; I don't see a primary topic here. Deor (talk) 01:20, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
yemanja
editYemanja is not a Brazilian Goddess of Sea. It's african's. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yemaja
The afrodecendant created a afro-brazillian culture in which Yemanja is part of. But it is originally an african orixá. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 177.12.4.105 (talk) 15:27, 21 April 2014 (UTC)