What's with all these tags? I've just removed some again for these reasons:
- Single source. It has already been made clear in the AfD that there more sources exist. To satisfy any wikilawyers I've added another one to the article.
- Expand. There is already a stub tag on the article which requests expansion, so this redundant. See template:expand/doc for advice on how this tag should be used: "{{Expand}} should not be used on articles concurrently with stub templates" (original emphasis).
- Unencyclopedic. What on earth is unencyclopedic anout this?
- Orphan. There are links to this article from the ones on the stars of the film. If and when an article gets created on the director that can be linked too. Where else are they needed?
- Notable. Only one person is questioning the notability of this film, but I suppose we can leave the tag there until the AfD closes.
- Phil Bridger (talk) 08:15, 19 April 2008 (UTC)Reply
.svg)
