- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by — Crisco 1492 (talk) 03:46, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Book of Spells
edit... that the Book of Spells is the launch title for the PlayStation 3 peripheral Wonderbook, having been created in conjunction with Harry Potter author J. K. Rowling?
- Reviewed: Baldin Collection
- Comment: I was aiming for this to be a double nomination, but couldn't get enough information together on the Wonderbook itself (without duplicating information from the Book of Spells article) to sneak past the 1500 character limit. I've tried to keep the hook catchy, but not intentionally promotional.
Created/expanded by CaseyPenk (talk), Miyagawa (talk). Nominated by Miyagawa (talk) at 16:43, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
- ALT1 ... that Book of Spells, an upcoming Wonderbook for PlayStation 3, is a companion to Harry Potter?
Since reviewers are not allowed to approve their own alternate hooks, can we please have an independent reviewer here? Thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 16:16, 17 June 2012 (UTC)
- I'm sorry! I wasn't sure what the protocol was for this, but I figured someone would step in if I messed up (which is what happened).--¿3family6 contribs 01:36, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
- No problem! We all learn by doing. I think the article is borderline in terms of content size: while it is a couple of characters over the absolute minimum of 1500, there's a lot of duplication between the intro and the body of the article. Furthermore, there's a significant issue with sourcing: the cited [1] source does not state that this is the first Wonderbook, and the release "date", which only appears in the intro and not in the body, is not cited at all. (The sources I looked at say "at Christmas", which isn't very helpful, and doesn't even allow the use of "fall" as a time of year.) BlueMoonset (talk) 02:23, 18 June 2012 (UTC)