Template:Did you know nominations/Capital City Fire and Rescue

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: rejected by Fuebaey (talk) 20:10, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Capital City Fire/Rescue

edit

Created by Michaelh2001 (talk). Self-nominated at 03:04, 16 April 2015 (UTC).

  • New enough and long enough. Hook fact checks out. Creator not known to have issues with plagiarism. Article is neutral. Mjroots (talk) 05:36, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
*QPQ not needed as only 5th DYK. Mjroots (talk) 17:30, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Michaelh2001, I'm afraid that a QPQ will be required. Mjroots, as Michaelh2001's talk page clearly shows five prior DYK articles being posted on the main page—all you have to do is look and see all five messages—he has to supply a QPQ. Tools like the one you used aren't always accurate in counting all the DYKs. Generally, if it shows at least five, you know that a QPQ is required; if it shows fewer, it's best to check the talk page for confirmation. BlueMoonset (talk) 19:01, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
  • OK, comment struck. Mjroots (talk) 19:33, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Comment I will be happy to provide a QPQ here, but for future reference, isn't that required for the sixth? The first five being freebies? Juneau Mike (talk) 01:56, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
Juneau Mike, precisely. There is no QPQ required for the first five articles to be approved for the main page (though we always welcome reviews). As this is your sixth article, a QPQ is required. BlueMoonset (talk) 03:57, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
I dropped the ball here. Waited too long for QPQ, and had to move the page in the meantime. Recommend my nom be turned down. I'll do better next time. :/ Juneau Mike (talk) 06:52, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
@Michaelh2001: Without looking at the article, it looks like the nom just needs a QPQ. Would you care to complete one so this can move on? Fuebaey (talk) 06:59, 13 May 2015 (UTC)