Template:Did you know nominations/Ish Ledesma

Round symbols for illustrating comments about the DYK nomination The following is an archived discussion of Ish Ledesma's DYK nomination. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page; such as this archived nomination"s (talk) page, the nominated article's (talk) page, or the Did you knowDYK comment symbol (talk) page. Unless there is consensus to re-open the archived discussion here. No further edits should be made to this page. See the talk page guidelines for (more) information.

The result was: promoted by  — Crisco 1492 (talk) 07:41, 24 February 2013 (UTC).

Ish Ledesma

edit

Created by 28bytes (talk). Nominated by My76Strat (talk) at 15:49, 20 February 2013 (UTC).

  • Almost good to go, meets size, time, hook and BLP requirements. Only problem is that figurehead does not mean what the creator thinks that it means. This needs to be fixed before it goes on the main page.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 05:35, 23 February 2013 (UTC)
    I have modified that sentence in an attempt to clarify its meaning while retaining the key points authored. I believe I have satisfied the clarification query with this modification. Please, at your leisure, examine the changes made,[1] and express your manner of concurrence. Thank you for vesting the time required to review this nomination.—My76Strat (talk) 08:52, 23 February 2013 (UTC)
    • Now good to go, although I'm not sure what this means: benefactor of the genre since there's no mention of philanthropy in the article. But that's a minor issue.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 17:30, 23 February 2013 (UTC)
      Thank you again. I did remove that verbiage as I agree with you—it is too ambiguous.—My76Strat (talk) 07:44, 24 February 2013 (UTC)