Template:Did you know nominations/LearnedLeague

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: rejected by Allen3 talk 11:35, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
Insufficient progress toward resolving outstanding issues

LearnedLeague

edit

Created by Fryede (talk). Self nominated at 20:15, 16 October 2014 (UTC).

  • Needs more independent references before this can move ahead. Some layout headings wouldn't hurt either. Fuebaey (talk) 23:02, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
@Fryede: Are you still working on this nomination? The text could do with more inline cites. Fuebaey (talk) 15:45, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Nominator has not responded in three weeks, and indeed has not edited on Wikipedia in that time, and only made four edits in all of November. While the nomination was made soon enough after creation, and is long enough at 1905 prose characters, only two of the paragraphs have inline source citations, and one of them is entirely dependent on LearnedLeague's own website. A single independent source is not adequate to establish notability. Given the inadequate referencing in the article, this clearly does not qualify for DYK, and the nomination is being marked for closure. If the article is 5x expanded in the future, or is listed as a Good Article, a new DYK nomination can be made. BlueMoonset (talk) 15:34, 16 December 2014 (UTC)