- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Miyagawa (talk) 20:19, 18 April 2012 (UTC)
M. Balfas
edit- ... that Indonesian literary critic Muhammad Balfas' unfinished manuscript Si Gomar has been described as his most interesting?
Created/expanded by Crisco 1492 (talk). Self nom at 08:37, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
- Reviewed: Hōkoku-ji
- Since "most interesting" is a subjective opinion, I think the name of A. Teeuw should be mentioned. --SupernovaExplosion Talk 13:18, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
- As it's clearly an opinion, I don't think the name is necessary (especially when Teeuw is not well known outside of scholars and students of Indonesian literature). If this opinion were given by someone who is a household name, perhaps I'd consider it. I'll put it here as an alt though.
- Since "most interesting" is a subjective opinion, I think the name of A. Teeuw should be mentioned. --SupernovaExplosion Talk 13:18, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
- ALT1 ... that Indonesian literary critic Muhammad Balfas' unfinished manuscript Si Gomar has been described by Andries Teeuw as his most interesting? Crisco 1492 (talk) 13:26, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
- ALT1 is good to go. Article is well-referenced, hook is properly sources, article is long enough and new enough. --SupernovaExplosion Talk 13:30, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks for the review! Crisco 1492 (talk) 15:11, 12 April 2012 (UTC)
- ALT1 is good to go. Article is well-referenced, hook is properly sources, article is long enough and new enough. --SupernovaExplosion Talk 13:30, 11 April 2012 (UTC)