Template:Did you know nominations/Rescatemos a David y Miguel

Rescatemos a David y Miguel

(

• Back to T:TDYK
• Article history

)

Rescatemos a David y Miguel

• ... that you can leave a lock at the Rescatemos a David y Miguel memorial (pictured), installed six years ago today, as a symbol of demanding security?

• Source: Reporte Índigo: "She explains that the idea of installing the structure is to invite society to place locks that symbolize a demand for security, so that no one else has to disappear in the country, because it’s not just their families facing this problem—there are thousands of cases.

• ALT1: ... that the Rescatemos a David y Miguel memorial (pictured) was installed seven years ago today in response to a kidnapping that occurred thirteen years ago today? Source: Excélsior: Family and friends of David Ramírez and Miguel Ángel Rivera erected a memorial on Paseo de la Reforma in memory of the young men who were kidnapped on January 5, 2012.
• Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Charles Herman Allen and Template:Did you know nominations/American Wedding (song)
• Comment: This nomination is specific for January 5. File:Antimonumento de David y Miguel 2.jpg can also work as an image substitute.

Created by Tbhotch (talk). Number of QPQs required: 2. DYK is currently in unreviewed backlog mode and nominator has 49 past nominations.

(CC) Tbhotch^™ 19:34, 7 December 2024 (UTC).

• Article is new and long enough, looks well-cited. Bad news is that I'm fairly certain that the images, including the one attached to the nom here, are copyrighted. I had a similar issue with a draft I'm working on and brought it to the Teahouse ([1]). I'm afraid you'll have to reupload the images as fair use and exclude them from the nom. ~ Pbritti (talk) 01:16, 9 December 2024 (UTC)

• @Pbritti: Mexico has freedom of panorama. Refer to Commons:COM:Mexico for further information. (CC) Tbhotch^™ 01:20, 9 December 2024 (UTC)

• Briefly contemplated failing just out of shear envy, thought better of it. Can't say I know Spanish too well but I'm confident in the AGF on the citations, which are appropriately placed. QPQs done. The proposed run on 5 January is appropriate. Great work! ~ Pbritti (talk) 01:25, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
  • Regrettably, the QPQ done for Template:Did you know nominations/Charles Herman Allen was not adequate: while seven days is the standard for nominations to be made, DYK specifically allows a day or two latitude (typically given in general and particularly for new pre-QPQ participants as this nominator is); the nomination here was made nine days after creation. If Tbhotch will give this nomination a full review, a QPQ can be counted, or they can submit another review for that purpose. Thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 02:10, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
    • @BlueMoonset: It seems that you're failing this hook based on Tbhotch's literal interpretation of the reviewing guidelines. While you can contest their review (I'm not sure the term supersede is appropriate), this is almost certainly not sufficient ground to supersede my review of this hook. Reaffirming the AGF pass. ~ Pbritti (talk) 03:14, 9 December 2024 (UTC)