Template:Did you know nominations/Time-resolved spectroscopy
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: rejected by reviewer, closed by BlueMoonset talk 00:33, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
Nominated article doesn't come close to qualifying for DYK, and doesn't even have a proposed hook; closing as unsuccessful
DYK toolbox |
---|
Time-resolved spectroscopy
- ... that
- Reviewed:
Created by Mr6966 (talk). Nominated by Lv9454 (talk) at 13:32, 14 December 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Time-resolved spectroscopy; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page. General eligibility:
- New enough: - No, it has not been expanded, created, or improved to GA status.
- Long enough: - The article is long enough, but has not been expanded enough.
Policy compliance:
- Adequate sourcing:
- Neutral:
- Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:
Hook eligibility:
- Cited: - There is no hook to speak of.
- Interesting:
QPQ: