Archive 5Archive 7Archive 8Archive 9Archive 10Archive 11Archive 15

04:43, Sunday, December 1, 2024 (UTC)

User:Stormtracker94
User:Stormtracker94/Photos
User:Stormtracker94/Userboxes
User_talk:Stormtracker94
Stormtracker94 Awards Userboxes Talk

Hello.About a month ago, you nominated this use for adminship, which he declined. He has since accepted my nom, and was wondering if you would like to co-nominate with me. You're free to add one in at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/NASCAR Fan24 if you want. If not, that's fine, just let me and him know. Wizardman 03:04, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

Actually, I think it's too late to do a co-nom now; you'd just be better off !voting. NF24(radio me!) 13:03, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

Typo

You have a typo on your userpage, the word "userpage" in the complaints section is misspelled "userpaage". Just thought you might want to know. 216.49.181.128 (talk) 23:14, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

Sorry about that

Accidental very sorry about that--Thevardonrushes (talk) 20:52, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for January 14th, 2008.

The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery



Volume 4, Issue 3 14 January 2008 About the Signpost

From the editor: A new weekly feature 
Special: 2007 in Review Wikimania 2009 bidding ends, jury named 
Controversial non-administrator rollback process added Supposed advance draft of Jobs keynote surfaces on talk page 
WikiWorld comic: "The Nocebo Effect" News and notes: Fundraiser ends, $500,000 donation, milestones 
Wikipedia in the News Tutorial: Fundamentals of editing 
Features and admins Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News 
The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 09:04, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

Newsletter

I think it may need delaying again this week. News is, again, slow.   jj137 18:10, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

All right, I fixed all of the moves.   jj137 02:06, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

Co-nom?

Would you mind if I co-nom'd you for your RFA? It would be an honor. --Sharkface217 19:32, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

I'll do it anyway. Thank you. --Sharkface217 19:42, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

Thanks...

...for devandalising my user page. Meisterkoch (talk) 21:01, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

Your RfA

Hey there. I just saw that you had withdrawn your RfA and I'd like to offer some moral support. Hopefully the fourth RfA will be the charm. =) NF24(radio me!) 23:12, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for January 21st, 2008.

The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery



Volume 4, Issue 4 21 January 2008 About the Signpost

Special: 2007 in Review, Part II New parser preprocessor to be introduced 
Commons Picture of the Year contest in final round WikiWorld comic: "Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo" 
News and notes: Freely-licensed music, milestones Wikipedia in the News 
Features and admins Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News 

Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 00:39, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Okay, that's just...

...really strange timing. I swear the barnstar you left wasn't there when I started to leave mine. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 20:54, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Texas Eagle

With regard to the Texas eagle and other amtrak consist Information I removed this information from all pages as it was unilaterally wrong, describing the trains in a way which was universally overspecific(Amtrak did not always, or in most cases did not even usually follow what was stated), and often blatantly wrong. The statement about the Texas Eagle consist was not only unsourced, but also entirely wrong. Amtrak consists can and do vary from day to day. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 157.252.162.226 (talk) 01:01, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

More on your RfA

Don't worry about arguments about too many RfAs in too short a period of time; such arguments are frivolous and a sad representation of what RfA has become. Wikipedia:RFA#Hdt83 is evidence of that.

One hint of advice: You should address any non-trivial concerns that voters might have. I would have supported had you simply addressed my concern about the ambiguity of Q3. Nousernamesleftcopper, not wood 01:14, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

Re; WP: Boston Celtics

First off, Thanks for joining! I could use some help, and I know you will be helpful with all the work with WP: BOSOX. Second, go for it, (the template). - Milk's Favorite Cookie 02:11, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

Looks great! Should we go ahead an renominate Boston Celtics for a FA? The last time it was nominated was November 2007. - Milk's Favorite Cookie 02:45, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
Done. Please help by voting. - Milk's Favorite Cookie 02:57, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

caution

This reinsertion of unsubstantiated, unreferenced material is in violation of WP:BLP and has been reverted. Gnangarra 08:14, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Boston Red Sox newsletter - January 27, 2008.

The Boston Red Sox WikiProject Newsletter
Volume 2, Issue 2 • January 27, 2008 • About the Newsletter
News

Project and team news:

Features

Featured Red Sox articles of the week:

New Articles

New Boston Red Sox related articles:

ArchivesNewsroom

You are receiving this newsletter because you are a member of WikiProject Boston Red Sox. If you would not like to receive this newsletter, please add your name here. JJBot (talk) 03:02, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP Celtics

Yes, please get started with that. There are a lot more article to assess actually. - Milk's Favorite Cookie 15:53, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

Ok. Based on this list[1] why don't you do the first 200 and I'll do the last. Is that Ok? - Milk's Favorite Cookie 16:03, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
It looks like it definitely won't succeed. - We definitely need to expand the lead section. Try to take a shot at that. Nice new sig by the way. And the Mets got Santana, not the Sox. Oh well... - Milk's Favorite Cookie 20:54, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

Signature

No, I'm not using a template. Could you give me an example of what you're talking about?   jj137 (talk) 20:56, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

Well, if you were wondering, I made this mistake last June [2] when someone notified me of it. When I asked for an example, what I meant to say was where my old signature changed.   jj137 (talk) 21:04, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
It's OK, no worries. I assume you heard Santana was traded to the Mets? :)   jj137 (talk) 21:18, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
Yeah, that wouldn't have been good. It was probably for the best Santana went to the Mets instead of the Yankees or Red Sox.   jj137 (talk) 21:21, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for January 28th, 2008.

The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery



Volume 4, Issue 5 28 January 2008 About the Signpost

From the editor: New feature 
Special: 2007 in Review, Part III Signpost interview: John Broughton 
New parser preprocessor introduced Best of WikiWorld: "Truthiness" 
News and notes: Estonian Wikipedia, Picture of the Year, milestones Wikipedia in the News 
Tutorial: Reporting and dealing with vandals WikiProject Report: Molecular and Cellular Biology 
Wikipedia Dispatches: Banner year for Featured articles Features and admins 
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News The Report on Lengthy Litigation 

Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 04:23, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

Pretty impressive job with this article, good luck on the nomination, cheers. - Caribbean~H.Q. 13:09, 31 January 2008 (UTC)