This is an archive of past discussions with User:TaerkastUA. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current main page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 |
January 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Paul Wight, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Do not add WWE speculation, wrestling observer and wrestle zone are not reliable sources. TrUcO9311 TaLk / SiGn 18:05, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
Please remember to mark your edits as minor if (and only if) they genuinely are minor edits (see Help:Minor edit). Marking a major change as a minor one is considered poor etiquette. The rule of thumb is that only an edit that consists solely of spelling corrections, formatting changes, or rearranging of text without modifying content should be flagged as a 'minor edit.' Thank you. Cheers, LAX 18:16, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Dead to Rights II.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Dead to Rights II.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Project FMF (talk) 03:14, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (Image:Houseofthedead4-logo.gif)
Thanks for uploading Image:Houseofthedead4-logo.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 06:00, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
Sequel to The Fast and Furious: Tokyo Drift
Per the cited source at IMDb, the sequel is unnamed; unless you can cite a reliable source (at least as reliable as IMDb, anyway) that gives a name for the sequel, please do not change it. It is particularly annoying that you changed the title but left the citation in place, which makes it look like the citation supported your version when it did not. -- Donald Albury 14:03, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
Release years
I mentioned the reason for the lack of a release year at Talk:The Wrestler (2009 film). IMDb only estimates release years at the beginning -- have you ever seen a "TBA", even when a project has just been announced? It doesn't update as quickly, either -- State of Play (film) is cited to be released in 2009, but IMDb still marks it as 2008. —Erik (talk • contrib) - 20:05, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
Nightmare and Englund
I'm just letting you know that I reverted your addition to the remake section of the Nightmare franchise article. When it comes to films, rumors and speculations run rapid until someone officially makes an annoucement. In comingsoon's case, they didn't appear to have any concrete sources, or at least none that they would name. Since we cannot verify that their information is reliable, we can't use it. The project was just announced so I'm sure we won't know if Englund is going to return unless someone connected to the project actually states so. BIGNOLE (Contact me) 18:46, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
Rollback
With your request at WP:RFPP regarding the Sean Kingston article, you were concerned about the vandalism to that page, hence the request. Well, to help you fight vandalism better, I've given your account rollback rights. For information on rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback and Wikipedia:Rollback feature. However, remember that rollback should only be used to revert vandalism, nothing else; and if you're not sure if an edit is vandalism or not, revert the edit manually instead of with rollback. Good luck. Acalamari 22:05, 31 January 2008 (UTC)