User:TaerkastUA/Archive 5

Archive 1

←

Archive 3

Archive 4

Archive 5

Archive 6

Archive 7

→

Archive 10

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Cars 2.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Cars 2.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:19, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Battlefield 3

An article that you have been involved in editing, Battlefield 3, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Battlefield 3 (2nd nomination). Thank you. SBIT (talk) 20:33, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

Beverly Hills Cop

It looks like you're off to a good start! I think what you could add is a Reception section. I know the films are old, but is there information about the box office performances? Also, you should try to find critical reactions of the series as a whole. You could do this two ways -- look at reviews for Beverly Hills III, which will usually compare that film to the first two. Another way is to find a film critic who has reviewed all three films and try to combine all that person's criticism. Also, I think that the "Awards and Nominations" section could be shorter, since each film article will have its own awards. Maybe you could just mention the major ones, like the Academy Awards, the BAFTAs, and the Golden Globes? —Erik (talk • contrib) - 03:30, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

Re: Beverly Hills Cop

First of all, thank you for your kind support of me as a coordinator! :) I'm happy to help WikiProject Films any way I can. As for Beverly Hills Cop (film series), I was wondering what your goal was for this article. I think you've provided a great foundation for the article with the reception information. There are some minor clean-ups that can be done. I don't know what more can be added to this article (as this wasn't a hugely famous film series) except for individual reviews across the three films. Were you able to find any specific critics who have reviewed all three films? You can trace what they thought of the films from the first to last. —Erik (talk • contrib) - 13:52, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

I'll see what I can do about the reviews, if possible. About the film series article, I've always wondered why there wasn't a series article for Beverly Hills Cop, so I decided to create one so to inform people of the entire series, the awards and receptions and for users to link back to. Plus future possible films, so that's what my aim is. I hope you make project co-ordinator by the way, good luck.--EclipseSSD (talk) 14:47, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Kate Wilson2.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Kate Wilson2.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. NotifyBot (talk) 14:30, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Highlander logo.JPG)

Thanks for uploading Image:Highlander logo.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. NotifyBot (talk) 14:31, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

The Hills Have Eyes 3 (2008 film)

I finally found some sources. Here, here,here, and here. Apparently it is in production and about halfway through filming. Would those sources be enough to recreate the article? LukeTheSpook (talk) 16:06, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

No, those sources wouldn't be enough because they only mention that it is a possibility. The sources you have gathered have not confirmed the film's production, and there isn't any listing on The IMDb. We really need an official source to say that the film has been confirmed DEFINITLEY, but until we do, that sources are merely speculation until a confirmation from the production company. So, in answer to your question, no, those sources wouldn't be enough to justify an article and can be considered rumours. --EclipseSSD (talk) 19:21, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

Re: RfA

I hope you can understand why I cast the vote the way I did. I do think that you mean well, but there is a lot to take in regarding the tools. If you continue to grow in your various directions, then I think you would become a stronger candidate. —Erik (talk • contrib) - 15:36, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

Your RFA

Some friendly advice. It's usually frowned upon to solicit participation in your own RfA. You may not be aware of that, but please refrain from posting talkpage messages like this. I completely believe you mean no harm, just some friendly advice. Hope your RfA goes well! Cheers, Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 15:37, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

I just updated your userpage to include the RfA notice template on the top, which is allowed and encouraged. Feel free to remove it from your userpage if you do not wish it to be there. Cheers, Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 15:39, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

further regarding your RfA

You have not accepted your own nomination, or made a nomination statement. I believe that the application may be considered malformed, and therefore invalid, without the former. I think you should investigate this. LessHeard vanU (talk) 23:43, 19 April 2008 (UTC)