March 2022

edit

  Hello, I'm 3PPYB6. I noticed that in this edit to Sadh Vaishnavism, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — 3PPYB6TALKCONTRIBS22:57, 5 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Sadh Vaishnavism, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. InterstateFive (talk) - just another roadgeek 23:15, 5 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Sadh Vaishnavism, you may be blocked from editing. NekoKatsun (nyaa) 15:11, 10 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm TartarTorte. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Bhaga—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. TartarTorte 01:11, 25 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Acroterion (talk) 02:32, 25 March 2022 (UTC)Reply