February 2023

edit

  Hello, I'm 98Tigerius. An edit that you recently made to 2023 Spikers' Turf Open Conference seemed to be a test and has been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! 98Tigerius (talk) 08:02, 5 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to Ulat Bayan. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Materialscientist (talk) 10:28, 5 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Inquirer 990 Television, you may be blocked from editing. Migfab008 (talk) 23:16, 5 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at EAC Generals basketball. Migfab008 (talk) 23:18, 5 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Hello, I'm 98Tigerius. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, NCAA Season 98 volleyball tournaments, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. 98Tigerius (talk) 10:51, 18 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia, as you did to NCAA Season 98 volleyball tournaments. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to being blocked from editing. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. 98Tigerius (talk) 05:41, 19 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at NCAA Season 98 volleyball tournaments. 98Tigerius (talk) 15:27, 19 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. 98Tigerius (talk) 15:43, 19 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of one week for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Daniel Case (talk) 06:30, 20 February 2023 (UTC)Reply
Thank you. BostonMensa (talk) 20:18, 20 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to NCAA Season 98 volleyball tournaments—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 09:33, 27 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at NCAA Season 98 volleyball tournaments, you may be blocked from editing. — 9️⃣8️⃣🐯♒️(🆃🅰🅻🅺) 12:09, 27 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
 
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Verifiability is a core Wikipedia policy.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  ... discospinster talk 17:44, 27 February 2023 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Nomination of Iloilo United Royals for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Iloilo United Royals is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Iloilo United Royals until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

SeanJ 2007 (talk) 13:16, 16 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Negros Muscovados moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, Negros Muscovados, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 TT me 12:27, 18 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

March 2023

edit

  Hello, I'm NewManila2000. I just want to remind you that the notices that were indicated at the draftspace must not be removed until it had met the requirements to be restored as a wiki article. NewManila2000 (talk) 12:57, 18 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Oh, please stop making articles without including any independent and reliable sources, just like you did at Draft:Negros Muscovados and Draft:Bicol Volcanoes. NewManila2000 (talk) 13:41, 18 March 2023 (UTC)Reply