December 2013

edit

  Hello, I'm Some jerk on the Internet. Your recent edit to the page Mr. Peanut appears to have added incorrect information, so I have removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. The reverted edit can be found here. --some jerk on the Internet (talk) 15:07, 24 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

January 2014

edit

  Please do not add or change content, as you did to Daniel Bryan, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. STATic message me! 19:06, 5 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

 

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Antonio Cesaro, you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Antonio Cesaro was changed by 2000awesomee (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.924462 on 2014-01-07T12:51:45+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 12:51, 7 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

  This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at The Miz, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Acabashi (talk) 14:09, 7 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Pro Wrestling Illustrated awards may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • |'''[[Magnus (wrestler|Magnus]]

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:06, 8 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.  Mark Arsten (talk) 21:35, 8 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not add or change content, as you did to Ryback, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. STATic message me! 22:09, 22 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

February 2014

edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Leo Kruger, you may be blocked from editing. STATic message me! 23:35, 3 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

  This is your last warning. The next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Antonio Cesaro, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. STATic message me! 19:42, 12 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

April 2014

edit

  Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to CM Punk. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. STATic message me! 17:05, 1 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

June 2014

edit

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at The Shield (professional wrestling). — Richard BB 23:15, 6 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

July 2014

edit

  This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Damien Sandow, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Widr (talk) 06:42, 21 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Damien Sandow, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Border Patrol. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 28 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open!

edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:05, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ethan Carter III, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Lashley and Bound For Glory. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:54, 16 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Damien Sandow, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bound For Glory. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:41, 24 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

edit

Hello, 2000awesomee. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

August 2017

edit

  Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons. Thank you. Chris "WarMachineWildThing" Talk to me 22:16, 9 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not add or change content, as you did at Chad Gable, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. YouTube is not a reliable source. Chris "WarMachineWildThing" Talk to me 23:31, 9 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Chad Gable. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Chris "WarMachineWildThing" Talk to me 23:33, 9 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

 

Your recent editing history at Chad Gable shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Chris "WarMachineWildThing" Talk to me 23:36, 9 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for Edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Alexf(talk) 00:02, 10 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Chad Gable. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. You were just blocked for edit warring over this, I suggest you stop. Chris "WarMachineWildThing" Talk to me 22:18, 14 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for adding spam links. Persistent spammers will have their websites blacklisted from Wikipedia and potentially penalized by search engines. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Amortias (T)(C) 22:26, 14 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Image without license

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:010 JIND 08172017jg 0058--0274a9ec56efe574bb5f83601b6cdfdd.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 19:45, 11 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

 

A tag has been placed on File:010 JIND 08172017jg 0058--0274a9ec56efe574bb5f83601b6cdfdd.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Nickag989talk 19:53, 11 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Image without license

edit

Unspecified source/license for File:DJ2HqlWVAAEn0ar.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:DJ2HqlWVAAEn0ar.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 04:00, 22 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Unspecified source/license for File:Mahal2017.PNG

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Mahal2017.PNG. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 20:46, 23 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

December 2017

edit

  Hello, I'm KNHaw. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Drew Gulak, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please provide a source for your claim. KNHaw (talk) 18:54, 12 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Jinder.jpg

edit
 

A tag has been placed on File:Jinder.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

EXIF states copyright held by Andrea Kellaway Photography 2017. Not used in any article. No rationale since upload. Identical upload at Commons has been deleted.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Green Giant (talk) 01:31, 15 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

January 2018

edit

  Hello, I'm KNHaw. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Drew Gulak, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please provide a source for your claim. KNHaw (talk) 22:07, 22 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Drew Gulak, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Mark Andrews and Kalisto (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 25 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

General sanctions

edit

Your recent edits (such as to Ethan Carter III) are against the established consensus at WikiProject Professional wrestling (link to discussion). Please note that WP:general sanctions are now imposed on Professional wrestling articles—see WP:GS/PW for more information. Further disruptive editing will force me to report you, possibly leading to a loss of editing privileges within this topic. Prefall 02:42, 1 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

It's not my fault that someone removed the movesets off all the freaking wrestlers. I'm not gonna spend 3 hours to fix them with your bullshit.

July 2018

edit

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at A.J. Styles. Prefall 02:50, 1 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

Fuck y'all i'm just trying to help it's not my fault that some asshole prick decided to remove all the movesets from the wrestlers

Please read the discussion that I have linked to you several times now (Here is a link to it again). Consensus was reached within WikiProject Professional wrestling to remove the "In wrestling" / "Professional wrestling" highlights section from all professional wrestling articles. Prefall 02:57, 1 July 2018 (UTC)Reply
edit

As you have failed to adhere to common behavioral standards via personal attacks ([1][2]), you are now indefinitely prohibited from editing any page related to professional wrestling, broadly construed. You will be blocked if you do not abide by this restriction. This restriction is placed under the authority of the community and is logged at WP:GS/PW. MER-C 19:26, 1 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

July 2018

edit
 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  NeilN talk to me 19:53, 1 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

You can either accept that the community has decided to make content in this area more encyclopedic and edit accordingly or you can continue spewing obscenities and be blocked indefinitely. One choice at least allows you to help shape the articles you're interested in after your topic ban is appealed successfully. --NeilN talk to me 19:59, 1 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

Fuck you — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2000awesomee (talkcontribs) 23:01, 1 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

And with that, I've made this block indef and removed your talk page access. You can appeal via WP:UTRS. TonyBallioni (talk) 16:30, 2 July 2018 (UTC)Reply