December 2022

edit

  Hello, I'm Centcom08. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Ironheart (TV series), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Centcom08 (talk) 01:17, 3 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, 201.188.151.124. I noticed that one of your recent edits added a link to an image on an external website or on your computer, or to a file name that does not exist on Wikipedia's server. For technical and policy reasons it is not possible to use images from external sources on Wikipedia. Most images you find on the internet are copyrighted and cannot be used on Wikipedia, or their use is subject to certain restrictions. If the image meets Wikipedia's image use policy, consider uploading it to Wikipedia yourself or request that someone else upload it. See the image tutorial to learn about wiki syntax used for images. Thank you. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 02:16, 3 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at The Flash (film), you may be blocked from editing. Trailblazer101 (talk) 07:22, 3 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Chilean editor: as a further note, I hope you can be made aware of the unconstructive nature of edits which change the titles of articles within references to your preferred wording. It is in the nature of references to be literal, as that is how we look them up, regardless of the language. By rewording the titles of source articles into your preferred English wording, you may make yourself happy, but the amount of reader confusion which results is incalculable. Please be cognizant of unintended consequences of your actions! Not being a native English speaker is no excuse for this. Quisqualis (talk) 20:27, 3 December 2022 (UTC)Reply
== December 2022: ¿Quiere ser bloquado permanentamente? ==
Wikipediano de Chile: TRADUSQUE Y LEA
You do not understand how to edit English Wikipedia. Have you tried your first language Wikipedia, such as the Spanish? Look at what you did here. You fucked up the references. Why? You must stop this idiocy or be banned from English Wikipedia. Feel free to ask necessary questions at the WP:TEAHOUSE--Quisqualis (talk) 22:47, 4 December 2022 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Unblock

edit
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

201.188.151.124 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I haven't done nothing wrong, i just wanted to help with references 201.188.151.124 (talk) 02:47, 4 December 2022 (UTC) Reply

Decline reason:

This is the sort of unusual situation that comes up if you hang around long enough.

Normally when I see this sort of unblock request, I look at the block and one of two things happens: I paste in {{rangeblocked}} as my decline reason, or I suggest to the blocked editor that, if they already have a registered account, they apply for IP block exemption.

However, here you had already been editing disruptively (though not without intending to do so) and then, via what is honestly and truly an amazing coincidence, your IP was blocked as a proxy.

Unblocking proxy blocks is something most of us don't get into and don't want to ... it requires all sorts of technical knowledge and an argument that you will lost 99.999% of the time. And in this case there were enough edits and warnings to sustain a block in any event.

So, I will just be letting this block stand. Take the warnings above to heed and, when the block expires, don't change the titles of references within references, OK? — Daniel Case (talk) 08:02, 4 December 2022 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

201.188.151.124 (talk) 02:47, 4 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hello, 201.188.151.124, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking   or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! Quisqualis (talk) 22:56, 4 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Quisqualis (talk) 22:56, 4 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page The Flash (film) has been reverted.
Your edit here to The Flash (film) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links in references which are discouraged per our reliable sources guideline (see also this list of frequently-discussed sources). The reference(s) you added or changed (https://www.reddit.com/r/DC_Cinematic/comments/phwgxv/harry_lennixmartian_manhunter_might_be_in_the/) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 08:11, 9 December 2022 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

Blocked

edit
 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Jayron32 15:03, 9 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Unblock

edit
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

201.188.151.124 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I haven't done nothing wrong, i was blocked only for adding references that i thought it would serve, calling it vandalism, but it never was with bad intention 201.188.151.124 (talk) 21:47, 9 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

You were blocked for violating WP:EW but don't address that in your unblock request. Yamla (talk) 21:50, 9 December 2022 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock

edit
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

201.188.151.124 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I haven't done nothing wrong, besides, i never wanted an "edit war"; i just wanted to help 201.188.151.124 (talk) 01:54, 11 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

The poor grammar of this statement nonwithstanding- not wanting an edit war is fine, but it happened nevertheless. You'll need to tell us how you will avoid edit wars in the future. 331dot (talk) 10:10, 11 December 2022 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.