31.187.7.220

November 2020

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to World Toilet Day—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 16:30, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

December 2020

Hello, I'm Donner60. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Dublin Bus, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Donner60 (talk) 23:10, 30 December 2020 (UTC)

January 2021

Hello, I'm C.Fred. I noticed that you recently removed content from The Square Tallaght without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. —C.Fred (talk) 18:21, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Alessandro Volta. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. —Bruce1ee^talk 13:26, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

Hello, I'm C.Fred. Your recent edit(s) to the page Katharine Tynan appear to have added incorrect information, so they have been removed for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 18:03, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

February 2021

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Jack Cohen (businessman). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ‑‑ElHef (Meep?) 15:13, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. CLCStudent (talk) 12:04, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 36 hours to prevent further vandalism.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 12:25, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Hello, I'm Smirkybec. I noticed that you recently removed content from Ben Dunne, Snr. without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Smirkybec (talk) 20:59, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Ben Dunne, Snr., without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Smirkybec (talk) 21:02, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Ben Dunne, Snr., you may be blocked from editing. Smirkybec (talk) 21:03, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Washing. DanCherek (talk) 14:42, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

April 2021

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Ben Dunne, you may be blocked from editing. Once again, the edits you have made to the article on Ben Dunne are not constructive. Smirkybec (talk) 16:08, 2 April 2021 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Bold(detergent), you may be blocked from editing. Interesting Geek (talk) 20:29, 2 April 2021 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Des Lynam. DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:03, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, I'm 31.187.7.220. I did not intend to write an unsourced death on Des Lynam. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. —31.187.7.220 (talk) 16:24, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

That's curious. You wrote that he's dead, and you didn't provide a source (and all of this over three separate edits). Can you please explain how you did that unintentionally; are you perhaps invoking the automatism defence? If your edit history weren't full of vandalism, I might buy that, alas... --DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:48, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

Mr. Lynam was getting of age, and was supposed to return home. I suggest... - 31.187.7.220 (talk) 15:06, 12 April 2021 (UTC)

I claimed to have heard the news and then wrote in Lynam's death, however, it was reverted. - 31.187.7.220 (talk) 11:20, 13 April 2021 (UTC)

"Heard the news" is not enough. You need to cite specifically what news service covered the story, and ideally provide links to the online version of it. Note that with deaths, we generally wait for multiple news sources to cover an event, rather than going on one initial report. —C.Fred (talk) 14:26, 13 April 2021 (UTC)

This discussion will return to normal. - 31.187.7.220 (talk) 16:27, 13 April 2021 (UTC)

16 April

• Another user of this IP has already been warned for adding unsourced material to articles. The only reason this IP wasn't blocked for the edits to Charles Leiper Grigg is that I'm not sure it's the same editor. That said, if you add a cause a death to that article without adding a source, you do so at peril of being blocked. —C.Fred (talk) 12:28, 16 April 2021 (UTC)

Hello, I'm RacoonyRE. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Pietro Ferrero Jr.—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. RacoonyRE ^{Message me}_{Contributions} 16:52, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

I was at the Teahouse today having chats, i enjoyed being there, and would like to go again.

- (31.187.7.220 (talk) 16:42, 19 April 2021 (UTC))

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, discussion pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments, as you did at Wikipedia:Teahouse, is considered bad practice, even if you meant well. Even making spelling and grammatical corrections in others' comments is generally frowned upon, as it tends to irritate the users whose comments you are correcting. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. bonadea contributions talk 17:03, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello there! I noticed that you gave some advice to a user and while it wasn't entirely unhelpful, some of it was rather discouraging such as "only make general edits or they will be reverted" which is false. This discourages new users from making helpful, large edits on Wikipedia as it makes them afraid that if they do so it'll be reverted. Also make sure to use the <code></code> template when adding template code to something to show a user how to use it so it actually shows the code instead of just adding the template. Blaze The Wolf | Proud Furry and Wikipedia Editor (talk) 19:46, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Sasquatch t|c 16:32, 21 April 2021 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

31.187.7.220 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

'It was accidental, and I’m not trying it. 31.187.7.220 (talk) 21:33, 21 April 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

You are either trolling or lack sufficient competence to edit Wikipedia. Either way, the block is appropriate and you should consider other sites, as you are unwilling or unable to contribute constructively here. Yamla (talk) 21:43, 21 April 2021 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Block evasion

Wiww51 evaded this block; see this admission. --Yamla (talk) 13:36, 24 April 2021 (UTC)

(talk page watcher) To quote the Springfield: “There’s something happening here. What it is ain’t exactly clear.” — Marchjuly (talk) 21:57, 24 April 2021 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

31.187.7.220 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I have to edit some important articles immediately, please.

Decline reason:

If you want to be unblocked, you need to convince us that you won't repeat the mistakes you've made in the past. —C.Fred (talk) 17:39, 12 May 2021 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

31.187.7.220 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I really accidentally made those 'mistakes' in the past (April 2021), so not a chance will I be disruptive and will edit normally. 31.187.7.220 (talk) 17:46, 12 May 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I see no evidence that unblocking you will benefit the encyclopedia. As you continue to make appeals that don't address the reasons and level of disruption, I'm also revoking talk page access. You can appeal via WP:UTRS.Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 17:58, 12 May 2021 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 year for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.  Daniel Case (talk) 19:31, 29 August 2021 (UTC)

April 2022

Hello, I'm Martinevans123. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Countdown (game show) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Martinevans123 (talk) 20:12, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Nick Hewer. Martinevans123 (talk) 20:13, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 year for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.  Daniel Case (talk) 03:09, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

@Yamla: Daniel Case (talk) 03:09, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

---