Your submission at Articles for creation: Tuna batida (October 12)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Qcne (talk) 21:31, 12 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, 38.141.37.227! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Qcne (talk) 21:31, 12 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tuna batida (October 12)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Qcne (talk) 21:43, 12 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

October 2023

edit

  Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Oaxaca City—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 22:31, 12 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
 
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours to prevent further vandalism.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 22:35, 12 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Archaeology and the Book of Mormon. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. NoNAja (talk) 20:59, 16 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

 
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week to prevent further vandalism.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:07, 16 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

November 2023

edit
 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Newark Holy Stones have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 22:46, 16 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

My content was constructive. I was providing a Romanization so people reading can read what the keystone says without confusing them. 38.141.37.227 (talk) 22:58, 16 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
You're replying to a bot, which can't read your comments. You can report a mistake to the bot's operators if you'd like; the link is in the message you replied to.
Regarding your edit, please make sure to provide a source for any content that you add. Thanks. AntiDionysius (talk) 23:02, 16 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
how do you do that? my source is Ohio.edu. 38.141.37.227 (talk) 23:03, 16 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
There's a guide to sourcing for new editors here. AntiDionysius (talk) 23:07, 16 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Go ahead, destroy this page. (November 16)

edit
 
Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Significa liberdade was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.
Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 23:50, 16 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
I did this so that Vandals can learn not to vandalize by being banned. Also it is a joke page. 38.141.37.227 (talk) 03:27, 17 November 2023 (UTC)Reply