Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

edit
 
Hello, 71.11.78.106. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by King of Scorpions 18:00, 13 March 2020 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).Reply

Welcome!

edit

Hello, 71.11.78.106, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by adding a space and four tildes to the end of the last line of your post, like this:

This is the last line of the post. ~~~~

The tildes will be automatically converted to a signature that contains your linked username and a timestamp to help keep conversations organized. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask at the Teahouse, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help here on your talk page and a volunteer will visit you here shortly. Again, welcome! —[AlanM1 (talk)]— 00:39, 14 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

March 2020

edit

  Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Diep.io, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. King of Scorpions 17:38, 16 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Diep.io. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. King of Scorpions 17:45, 16 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Diep.io, you may be blocked from editing. King of Scorpions 17:51, 16 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
 
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month to prevent further vandalism.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  GirthSummit (blether) 17:52, 16 March 2020 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

unblck me plz

edit
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

71.11.78.106 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

sry ddnt know that the vndlsm wsnt ok I was jus tryna have little fun unblock me plz

Decline reason:

If you somehow think vandalism is acceptable anywhere, you lack the basic competence to edit Wikipedia. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇 21:27, 16 March 2020 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock

edit
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

71.11.78.106 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I apologize for vandalizing Wikipedia. I have realized that that is inappropriate, and will contribute constructively instead. 71.11.78.106 (talk) 18:43, 20 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

No thanks. You knew it was inappropriate before and did it anyway. You've demonstrated you should be blocked. Yamla (talk) 18:49, 20 March 2020 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You also aren't addressing your blatantly obvious violation of WP:EVADE. You are SithJarJar666 and know you aren't welcome here, while your account is blocked. --Yamla (talk) 18:51, 20 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

@Yamla: Actually, I'm King of Scorpions trying to get my IP unblocked. If you think about it, I did nothing wrong. I just happened to share an IP with a vandal (which SithJarJar666 never told me about by the way). I was just copyediting, and then next thing I know, I'm blocked! I'm trying to get unblocked, but if not, I may just have to quit Wikipedia altogether. I used to think it was friendly, but now I realize how hostile it really is. (these might be my parting words, or they might not. I'm not sure yet. --King of Scorpions (aka KOS) 71.11.78.106 (talk) 15:40, 24 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

You know how to make an unblock request. This isn't it, and demonstrates you are continuing to be abusive. --Yamla (talk) 15:45, 24 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

KoS's unblock request

edit
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

71.11.78.106 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I understand that it looks like I'm a sock puppet of SithJarJar666, but I'm really not. Therefore, I'm requesting unblock so that I can get back to constructive Wikipedia editing. I understand what I'm accused of, and I'll make sure that nothing like this ever happens again. Thank you. 71.11.78.106 (talk) 15:52, 24 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

Continuation of this pointless palaver. Talk page access already revoked as noted below. Favonian (talk) 18:08, 24 March 2020 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 
Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.