76.126.49.152

April 2019

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Honey Bunny has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Honey Bunny was changed by 76.126.49.152 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.94179 on 2019-04-04T00:28:37+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 00:28, 4 April 2019 (UTC)

May 2019

This was not helpful. Did you notice the title of the publication? You might as well have changed the link to body part.

And why are you so fixated on underpants? Again, misapplied gender neutrality?

Why would you delete related projects? Are you a member of those projects?

Hmm, are you editing under more than one IP? Undergarment Talk:Bikini List of Powerpuff Girls Z characters

• 134.154.41.35 and 76.126.49.152
• 134.154.41.35 and 76.126.49.152

where 134.154.41.35 (talk · contribs) is the school IP and 76.126.49.152 (talk · contribs) is the home IP? And also 134.154.53.236 (talk · contribs) at school? Also [[134.154.42.9}}? Also 134.154.52.180 (talk · contribs)?

And why would you change so many instances of 'undergarments' to 'underpants' in article undergarments? That makes no sense at all.

While most every edit you have made has been reverted (sometimes several times) you did get one right. (They'd split the bikini article in 2009 and never fixed the redirect)

Shenme (talk) 00:43, 27 May 2019 (UTC)

September 2019

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to Young adult fiction does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

• User contributions
• Recent changes
• Watchlists
• Revision differences
• IRC channels
• Related changes
• New pages list
• Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! — Anita5192 (talk) 05:39, 28 September 2019 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

A cup of tea for you!

Thanks for the edits to USS Callister! — Bilorv (talk) 02:42, 27 October 2019 (UTC)

October 2019

Hello, I'm CLCStudent. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Physiology of dinosaurs have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. CLCStudent (talk) 18:05, 28 October 2019 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2019

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Gynaecology. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Puddleglum2.0👌(talk) 01:01, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Gynaecology, you may be blocked from editing. Alexf^(talk) 02:40, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

December 2019

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at USS Callister. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges. Thank you. Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 00:00, 2 December 2019 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 01:57, 2 December 2019 (UTC)

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 6 months for block evasion.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  ST47 (talk) 22:41, 7 December 2019 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

---