User talk:A diehard editor/2019/August

Help

|I am improving an article thats been put up for deletion called Ocenarium Bournemouth here. How do I know that the improved article can be transferred back to mainspace}}

A diehard editor (talk) 02:20, 14 August 2019 (UTC)

While it is still an undeleted article, you can improve it by editing it. Adding notability references and toning down the promotional language would address the issues brought up in the deletion discussion. Don't wait for the deletion discussion to conclude; if you have the ability to improve the article, do it now.

One of the options being discussed in the deletion discussion is Draftify. If that's what happens to the article, it would be best to work on the draft rather than your own version.

If the current article is, in the end, deleted, you could ask the editor who closed the deletion discussion to comment on whether your new and improved article is acceptable; in particular, whether your improvements have overcome the earlier reasons for deletion. That should help avoid any knee-jerk reactions to the article being recreated after a deletion discussion.

In the end, every article has to stand on its own merits and every editor is expected to learn what makes an article acceptable; you could move your improved page into article space on your own authority. It will still be reviewed by new page patrol; you may want to add a note to the talk page that explains why you think the new article has overcome the objections from the deletion discussion as a preemptory move. — jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 04:55, 14 August 2019 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Tagged with…
76		Comeng (train) (talk)	Add sources
986		Convenience store (talk)	Add sources
136		Tondo (historical polity) (talk)	Add sources
35		CEN/XFS (talk)	Add sources
21		Rajah Baguinda (talk)	Add sources
12		Owen Falls (talk)	Add sources
139		The Evolution of Cooperation (talk)	Cleanup
100		Shoulder surfing (computer security) (talk)	Cleanup
1,212		History of the Philippines (talk)	Cleanup
17		Advent Conspiracy (talk)	Expand
704		Police brutality (talk)	Expand
180		Babaylan (talk)	Expand
851		George Costanza (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
147		Northern and southern China (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
226		Teeth blackening (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
312		Sultanate of Sulu (talk)	Merge
203		Health care prices in the United States (talk)	Merge
79		Dance in ancient Egypt (talk)	Merge
19		Blasphemy law in Egypt (talk)	Wikify
1,516		Father's Day (talk)	Wikify
600		Bassenthwaite Lake (talk)	Wikify
2		Countercultural model (talk)	Orphan
10		Vortex Engineering (talk)	Orphan
21		Magdalena Villaruz (talk)	Orphan
38		Blue Nile Falls (talk)	Stub
40		Daniel Peter (talk)	Stub
76		Vox Lux (soundtrack) (talk)	Stub
10		Pagsanghan, Samar (talk)	Stub
78		Drew Baglino (talk)	Stub
11		People's Liberation Army Daily (talk)	Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 02:05, 15 August 2019 (UTC)

Shadilay

Hello Diehard! I see now that Shadilay was discussed on Articles for Deletion back in 2017 (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shadilay) where the consensus was to merge to the main article and mention the song under the section Kekistan. It might be enough to just redirect to that section again? – Thjarkur (talk) 16:57, 15 August 2019 (UTC)

You too, @Þjarkur:. Actually, I knew it was deleted, however there are a bunch of good sources now, so I thought, Shadilay should be a new article. I was thinking of the main article thing. So in the Pepe the Frog article we can do a little something like this.

Kekistan (test)

So, here would be the text about Kekistan, but it’s this text instead because this is user talk, we’re not in Pepe the Frog article. So we can do a little something like this:

Shadilay

Main article: Shadilay

Back to the topic

And that’s it!

The Bugle: Issue CLX, August 2019

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 and Peacemaker67 look at Italian, German and Australian forces in World War II

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 09:41, 16 August 2019 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CLX, August 2019

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 and Peacemaker67 look at Italian, German and Australian forces in World War II

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 09:42, 16 August 2019 (UTC)