User talk:AdamDeanHall/Archive 3

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Archive 4

Archive 5

→

Archive 9

Interacting with other users

Please assume good faith in your dealings with other editors, which you did not on User talk:Readopedia. Assume that they are here to improve rather than harm Wikipedia. This is certainly not any way to communicate with a good faith editor at all. Use the regular templates or actually look through the content of the edits before making these assertions. It is clear to me there was no ill will at all (I definitely wanted to throw out the exclamation point myself) and reactions like this drive away good editors from the project. Thank you. Nate • (chatter) 05:38, 21 September 2010 (UTC)

WWE NXT

Hi there. Could you please enlighten me on this edit? You left no edit summary so I am left in the dark as to why you reinstated a flagicon which seems to me to be clearly against MOS:FLAG. Is there some special rule here I am missing? --Muhandes (talk) 17:28, 25 September 2010 (UTC)

The reason why I reinstated a flagicon is because I like having a flagicon on the WWE NXT page. AdamDeanHall (talk) 17:32, 25 September 2010 (UTC)

Do not change the syfy logo

Please do not revert the syfy logo back to 40px the only reason that image was there because at the time there weren't any real normal text logos 40px is the normal official logo Totalaero (talk) 11:10, 28 September 2010 (UTC)

The Hub

Your comments on Talk:The Hub (TV network) seem to be asking questions about the subject matter, rather than the article. Talk pages are only supposed to be used for discussing how to improve the article. Read WP:FORUM. Digifiend (talk) 20:00, 30 September 2010 (UTC)

Clash of the Titans

I watched the Clash of the Titans movie, Sam Worthington as Perseus, perhaps I want Linda Cardellini as Andromeda, so who's played as Andromeda? --Gtabigfan2010 (talk) 20:42, 30 September 2010 (UTC)

Alexa Davalos, that's who. AdamDeanHall (talk) 20:43, 30 September 2010 (UTC)

The film director chosen Alexa Davalos to portray as Andromeda in 2010 film of Clash of the Titans, but in the next series of Clash of the Titans, I want Linda Cardellini portray as Andromeda. --Gtabigfan2010 (talk) 14:58, 1 October 2010 (UTC)

If you want to recognize Linda Cardellini at IMDb, here is a link www.imdb.com/name/nm0004802. And I want she play as Andromeda in the next Clash of the Titans. --Gtabigfan2010 (talk) 21:19, 20 October 2010 (UTC)

September 2010

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Toonzai. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Powergate92Talk 21:19, 30 September 2010 (UTC)

Tutenstein

Could you please explain why you would revert my repair work to the episode tables in the Tutenstein article, as you would of known, the airdates tab was broken and clearly seemed messy, that's why I fixed it. Mr.Television (talk) 14:54, 1 October 2010 (UTC)

I was only trying to repair the Hub category from being broken. AdamDeanHall (talk) 14:55, 1 October 2010 (UTC)

Alright then, have a nice day. Mr.Television (talk) 1During the day, the rebranded During the day, the rebranded channel will air programming for children ages 6-12, drawing largely on the libraries of both parent companies. This programming will air from 6:00AM through 8:00PM eastern time. There will also be a daytime block, called HubBub, aimed at preschoolers[7]. The Hub will feature sitcoms and dramas aimed at families and adults from 8:00PM through 6:00AM eastern time."#FF0800">QuasyBoy' 18:06, 1 October 2010 (UTC)

The Hub description

Adam, Why did you revert my description of The Hub? The description I provided:

During the day, the rebranded channel will air programming for children ages 6-12, drawing largely on the libraries of both parent companies. This programming will air from 6:00AM through 8:00PM eastern time. There will also be a daytime block, called HubBub, aimed at preschoolers[7]. The Hub will feature sitcoms and dramas aimed at families and adults from 8:00PM through 6:00AM eastern time.

was much better than what it was/what you reverted it back to. Why did you do this? I would like to revert it back to my change as it is cleaner and better-written. Thanks.

ETA: When doing such a change, please provide an edit summary explaining your decision. ChrisJsc (talk) 04:04, 6 October 2010 (UTC)

WCUU-CA, The U Too and Me Too

In the WCUU-CA article, it stated the The U Too will be shown on the WCIU-TV subchannels 26.5 and 26.6 - and also on analog channel 48. But since an analog signal cannot accommodate the full schedules of both services, it is expected that The U Too will completely displace Me Too from analog channel 48. CoconutHead65 (talk) 16:59, 12 October 2010 (UTC)

Well, then, where do you suppose Me Too will go? What new channel in Chicago will it be shown on? AdamDeanHall (talk) 17:27, 12 October 2010 (UTC)

Me Too will continue to be shown on WCIU's digital subchannel 26.3. CoconutHead65 (talk) 18:34, 12 October 2010 (UTC)

Do you have any idea which new channel AT&T U-verse will move Me Too to sometime in early December? Presently, it's on AT&T U-verse channel 48. AdamDeanHall (talk) 21:47, 12 October 2010 (UTC)

To answer your most recent question about The U Too, it is going to be carried on analog WCUU-CA, but the Chicago Tribune article listed as a reference on the U Too digital channel's launch in the WCIU article directly states that Me Too will remain on WCIU-DT, it just won't be a simulcast of WCUU-CA any longer. This means that while WWME-CA will continue to carry MeTV, Me Too will be a digital-exclusive service carried only on WCIU-DT3, and WCIU-DT5 and WCIU-DT6 will take over as simulcasters (if that is a correct term) of WCUU-CA's programming. (TVtonightOKC (talk) 16:50, 28 October 2010 (UTC))

Here is the Tribune article in question that help understand, it explains at the end of the article which subchannels will be affiliated with what after The U Too debuts. [1] (TVtonightOKC (talk) 16:53, 28 October 2010 (UTC))

A slight correction to TvtonightOKC's response: MeTV is currently digital-only, on WCIU-DT2 (23.1/26.2) and on WWME-LD (23.2). The analog Channel 23 signal, WWME-CA, is currently carrying a simulcast of The U (WCIU-TV's main channel). CoconutHead65 (talk) 21:30, 3 November 2010 (UTC)

October 2010

Your addition to Desperate Housewives (season 7) has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Readdition of text clearly copied directly from press releases. http://tvbythenumbers.com/2010/05/18/abc-announces-2010-11-primetime-schedule/51686 http://www.thefutoncritic.com/showatch/desperate-housewives/listings/ Logical Fuzz (talk) 13:37, 16 October 2010 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, AdamDeanHall. You have new messages at TheRealFennShysa's talk page.
Message added 21:23, 17 October 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Proposed deletion of Safari Tracks

The article Safari Tracks has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable television program. No evidence that is has ever garnered widespread recognition. Doesn't even say when or where it is shown.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 23:28, 20 October 2010 (UTC)

Caprica: Cancelled vs. On Hiatus

I invite you to air your thoughts here: Talk:Caprica_(TV_series)#Cancelled_vs._On_Hiatus. Clconway (talk) 16:44, 30 October 2010 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Before saving your changes to an article, please provide an edit summary for your edits. Doing so helps everyone to understand the intention of your edit (and prevents legitimate edits from being mistaken for vandalism). It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. ῤerspeκὖlὖm ^{in ænigmate ( talk )} 16:06, 31 October 2010 (UTC)

Syfy edit

Hi, I was curious why you completely reverted my edit to the Syfy infobox. I noticed that I accidentally deleted the former names section, and that should have been restored. However, the other edits I made, such as italicizing the slogan and reformatting the displayed are largely superficial and in line with other TV infoboxes as you can see here, here, and here. Would you object to me restoring those changes, as well as adding the FiOS channel number (since more information never hurts an article)? In the future, adding edit summaries would help clarify these things. Thanks! Helmandsare (talk) 21:30, 1 November 2010 (UTC)

Incomplete AFD nomination

• Pleasant Little Kingdom (AfD discussion)

Incomplete AFD nominations, where not all three of the required steps are performed, are generally only rolled forwards, rather than back, if there's some discernable reason for deletion given by the nominator. You haven't given any reason anywhere; nor done the three steps. Uncle G (talk) 00:49, 9 November 2010 (UTC)

Reasons for deletion

In regard to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Down the Block There's a Riot, your stated grounds for nomination was that it didn't meet the WP:ORG criteria. You also used that criterion earlier today with regard to another Desperate Housewives episode. But WP:ORG is for organizations, and television episodes aren't covered by it. I looked at your previous history of nominations for deletion, and I only found two, back in 2008. But both of those were on invalid grounds as well; you nominated an episode of Grey's Anatomy and a season of Ugly Betty for deletion because they didn't meet WP:PROF -- the criteria for academics. Can you please make sure that all future nominations you make for deletion are on relevant grounds only? This would include applying WP:ORG to organizations only, WP:PROF to academics only, etc. Thanks for your attention to this. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 21:53, 9 November 2010 (UTC)

November 2010

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Before saving your changes to an article, please provide an edit summary for your edits. Doing so helps everyone to understand the intention of your edit (and prevents legitimate edits from being mistaken for vandalism). It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. DKqwerty (talk) 17:03, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

Desperate Housewives Multi-camera/ single camera

Hi, do you mind if I ask you why you undid my revision, in which I changed "Multi-camera" to "Single camera" for the series Desperate Housewives? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.224.176.78 (talk) 19:14, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

I thought Multi-camera looked better. Even for all the World Wrestling Entertainment shows. AdamDeanHall (talk) 19:48, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

I do see what you mean. The look of the production is dependent on the type of cameras used, but the method of the shoot differs according to the content being filmed. In the case of Desperate Housewives, like most scripted movies/television, traditionally a single camera is used, which is moved after each successful take to obtain different camera angles within a scene. The multi-camera style is appropriate for events which have a live audience, like wrestling which you mentioned, or sitcoms. The definitions of single and multi-camera productions are fairly good at Wikipedia, here for multi-camera and here for single camera, although IMHO the latter needs some work for clarification.

I would appreciate it if you would allow me to restore my edit, as this is a straightforward factual claim on the Desperate Housewives page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.224.176.78 (talk) 23:15, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

Down the Block There's a Riot

STOP Your revert!! You keep readding the closed AfD notice, and there is no point in the article just listing an airdate with no plot. CTJF83 chat 19:58, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

Down the Block There's a Riot

Please stop removing properly referenced information that I have added to this article. This is an article that YOU nominated for deletion, so why are you even editing it? BurienBomber (talk) 17:04, 13 November 2010 (UTC)

Your vandalism report for 66.31.71.110

Can you show me which specific edits you were reporting as vandalism today?[2]

Thanks, --A. B. ^{(talk • contribs)} 21:41, 15 November 2010 (UTC)

Here's some of the specific edits I am reporting as vandalism: List of programs broadcast by The Hub and Transformers: Prime. AdamDeanHall (talk) 21:43, 15 November 2010 (UTC)

Adam, how do you know these edits^[3][4] are vandalism and not good faith edits? See Wikipedia:Vandalism#What is not vandalism -- might these have been innocent edits?

Also, why did you revert^[5] my removal of my block notice from this IP's page? I unblocked that IP, so the block notice no longer applies.^[6]

I appreciate your looking out for our articles but I want to make sure I'm not blocking someone who's trying to contribute.

--A. B. ^{(talk • contribs)} 02:55, 16 November 2010 (UTC)

Adam, you may find it helpful to peruse Guide to administrator intervention against vandalism. I notice you reported 2 more accounts^[7] which another admin subsequently declined to block.^[8]

--A. B. ^{(talk • contribs)} 03:24, 16 November 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Assassins (Desperate Housewives)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Assassins (Desperate Housewives) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 22:39, 19 November 2010 (UTC)

STOP

You do not own Wikipedia, so you have no right to delete other peoples sources. Especially on Desperate Housewives! So stop being a dickhead about it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 125.237.122.151 (talk) 20:30, 13 December 2010 (UTC)

Don't you dare call me a dickhead. Don't you dare! AdamDeanHall (talk) 20:31, 13 December 2010 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring, as you did at Assassins (Desperate Housewives). Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. TNXMan 14:59, 17 December 2010 (UTC)

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

Amy Adams

Would Amy Adams become a rally driver in World Rally Championship? --Gtabigfan2010 (talk) 19:22, 2 January 2011 (UTC)

FitTV

Nice work! I can't believe how quickly the article was attacked and improved significantly.

I rewrote the article a few months ago as the result of my stumbling across AHN information and realizing a further story needed to be told. I added most of the sources from Electronic Media in the 1990s.

Before the overhaul looked pretty basic and left questions like "Where did AHN come from?" unanswered. Originally AHN was to be a separate article that I wrote but FitTV was lacking such major historical details that I added it there instead.

I'm adding more sources on Cable Health Club now, as well! Raymie (t • c) 21:08, 17 January 2011 (UTC)

One additional concern: we don't need a main article template. On February 1, the entire article at FitTV will be moved to Discovery Fit & Health. Raymie (t • c) 21:18, 17 January 2011 (UTC)

[9] says "America's Health Network debuted in March" (the article was written in May 1996). I challenge you to find a reliable source that says that Cable Health Club became America's Health Network before the 1999 merger. Raymie (t • c) 21:43, 17 January 2011 (UTC)

Vandalism accusations

I don't appreciate your "note" on my talk page calling my edits to NBC Universal vandalism. You've been on WP long enough to know what vandalism is and what it is not. I'm actually discussing the issue on the article's talk page, which is more than you're doing. Please join the conversations there rather than blindly reverting experienced editors and calling their work vandalism. - BilCat (talk) 04:48, 31 January 2011 (UTC)

Puppy Bowl

This still needs a source to be included. As of right now, without one, it is considered original research and cannot be included. Further, there is no guarantee that next year's Super Bowl will even occur (there is a possibility of a lockout). Even further, that information does not belong in the section for reception. The section for production would probably be a better location for it. I appreciate you cleaning up the language, but it still not acceptable for Wikipedia at this time. --ICYTIGER'SBLOOD 22:18, 6 February 2011 (UTC)

Reversion

What is up with this edit?--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 01:27, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

DH 718

Tripod ins't a reliable source ? 92.149.81.197 (talk) 23:24, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

No, it isn't. And I suggest you stop adding those two episodes. If I find a reliable source for those two episodes, then, and only then, will I add those two episodes. AdamDeanHall (talk) 23:36, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

AdamDean, you DO NOT own the Desperate Housewives articles. Please stop talking like you and only you can add or update them. You have been told this MANY, MANY times. BurienBomber (talk) 01:34, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

^Preach ... -- A ^talk/_contribs 00:33, 4 March 2011 (UTC)

Based on....

If you had bothered to read either the title page of Arthur C. Clarke's novel 2001: A Space Odyssey or the article on the film (or any literature on making the film at all), you would know that it is the novel that is is based on the film rather than vice-versa.

Films that use characters from other novels in an entirely new situation are generally not considered to be "based on" the novel. The films Dracula II and Dracula III are sequels to Dracula 2000 which uses Bram Stoker's character, but none of these use plot elements of Stoker's novel. It is overtly stated in Template:Infobox film to not use the "based on" field if there is any ambiguity. (Occasionally plot elements from an original story show up in the film sequel as in Bride of Frankenstein in which case a "based on" may be legitimate, however that is not the case here.) I have reverted your "based on" edits to these as well.--WickerGuy (talk) 16:40, 15 April 2011 (UTC)

Desperate Housewives

Please do not just randomly add things back without reading why it was renewed. The website isn't reliable, they're assuming the show is renewed as the ladies have signed contract. Desperate Housewives has not officially been renewed for another season. Jayy008 (talk) 17:15, 17 April 2011 (UTC)

If it's sourced? But I'm not too sure. The page has loads of boxes with lots of countries ratings. It's probably best to bring it up at The TV Project page. Jayy008 (talk) 17:52, 17 April 2011 (UTC)

April 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article And Lots of Security..., please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 20:23, 23 April 2011 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia! I am glad to see you are interested in discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, talk pages such as Talk:Rise of the Planet of the Apes are for discussion related to improving the article, not general discussion about the topic. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. Thank you. SummerPhD (talk) 22:46, 24 April 2011 (UTC)

Chatting

Hello. I want to talk about Wrath of the Titans movie cast actors. Wrath of the Titans is also known as Clash of the Titans 2. I voted for Sam Worthington to played as Perseus.

Vote for that who played as Zeus:

- Liam Neeson

- Ben Stiller

- Jack Nicholson

I voted for Liam Neeson to played as Zeus.

And another vote for who played as Andromeda:

- Rosamund Pike

- Alexa Davalos

- Dianna Agron

I voted for Dianna Agron to played as Andromeda.

Please reply here. --Nestor1010 (talk) 19:37, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

2011–12 United States network television schedule

You are one of the leading editors at 2011–12 United States network television schedule. I found a circular link back to wikipedia in the ABC section and replaced it with citation needed. Hopefully you can find a proper WP:RS for it and any other similar circular links.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 19:19, 24 May 2011 (UTC)

HUB Article Ownership

I would love to know why you think that the 1966 Batman series doesn't fit under Comedy. You didn't mention any reason for removing my edit there. Same thing for Family Ties and Wonder Years. If Doogie Howser is a Drama, so are those two shows. But regardless, you reverted logical edits without any reason or discussion, that smacks of WP:OWN- Diesel Phantom (talk) 09:17, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

Canceled vs Cancelled

It's too trivial to fix one way or the other, but both "cancelled" (UK) and "canceled" (US) are acceptable spellings. In US spelling, normally you would not double a consonant on an unstressed syllable.

Given that Batman is a US title, some would argue that the US spelling should be preferred (assuming the rest of the article consistently uses US spelling). CüRlyTüRkey^Talk_Contribs 23:25, 14 June 2011 (UTC)

SORRY! That message was meant for the editor who corrected your spelling. CüRlyTüRkey^Talk_Contribs 23:28, 14 June 2011 (UTC)

Star Wars and Superman II

Please stop adding links to the Richard Donner cut of Superman II to the 1980 in film article. That version was not released until 2006, and never theatrically. Also, the listings for Star Wars in those articles should remain as Star Wars (even though the actual link goes to Star Wars Episode IV: A New Hope) as that was still the name of the film at the time - it wasn't renamed until 1981. MikeWazowski (talk) 00:58, 4 July 2011 (UTC)

Borders

Hello. You re-edited the Borders Group article to revert the "was ..." and the past tense to present tense. At what point would you say it's a "was" and not an "is"? When the last creditors are paid off, even though the company is virtually defunct, if not literally so. --- Wikiklrsc (talk) 19:50, 24 July 2011 (UTC)

I'd like to know that too. The company is liquidating, which is chapter 7. Stop reverting this, please. - Denimadept (talk) 20:55, 2 August 2011 (UTC)

There may be something you're not understanding. When a store is liquidated, it is no longer owned or run by the company whose brand it wears. The store is bought by the liquidator for pennies on the dollar, and the stock is sold off for whatever the liquidator can get for it. The former employees may still be there, but if so, they're being paid by the liquidator. So once you see liquidation signs in a store's window, it's already gone. Meanwhile, the company's offices are being shut down. The date I've seen published for this to complete is 30 September 2011. I'll get a cite if you wish. Regardless, the company is done. It's done this year. If Borders will continue in some way, it has yet to be announced to my knowledge. That will be the option, I expect, of its creditors, who now own it. - Denimadept (talk) 16:52, 10 August 2011 (UTC)

Friday Night Lights

Please stop reverting my edits to the 2011-12 network schedule about Friday Night Lights! There were only reruns from the 2008-09 season to the 2010-11 season. It's not right to say that it's not returning when I already said that in the 2008-09 schedule and moved to The 101 Network. 68.37.41.158 (talk) 20:27, 9 August 2011 (UTC)

Don't ignore my messages! See the talk page for the network schedule. 68.37.41.158 (talk) 00:38, 10 August 2011 (UTC)

August 2011

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to SOAPnet, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Farine (talk) 06:40, 22 August 2011 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	i award you a star for protecting List of programs broadcast by The Hub from Vandalism and Disruptive editing Digifan23 09:13, 27 August 2011 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	i award you a star for protecting List of programs broadcast by The Hub from Vandalism and Disruptive editing Digifan23 09:13, 27 August 2011 (UTC)

2011–12 United States network television schedule

Adam, I noticed you changed my edit from NFL on Fox back to The OT on the future network schedule. There was a discussion about it on the talk page I started about that. Please don't change edits without taking on the discussion pages for topics. Thank you. 68.37.41.158 (talk) 17:55, 28 August 2011 (UTC)

September 2011

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to Desperate Housewives (season 8). Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. -- Serienfan2010 (talk) 14:48, 1 September 2011 (UTC)

When you have a source, than add it. But when not it is unsourced. -- Serienfan2010 (talk) 14:52, 1 September 2011 (UTC)

A response to 3rd and Bird on Disney Junior...

IT IS TRUE! 3RD AND BIRD WILL AIR ON DISNEY JUNIOR!--68.202.56.108 (talk) 01:03, 5 September 2011 (UTC)

September 26,2011

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at SOAPnet, you may be blocked from editing. Farine (talk) 15:02, 26 September 2011 (UTC)

Please do not add unsourced content, as you did to SOAPnet. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Farine (talk) 15:06, 26 September 2011 (UTC)

Edit summaries

Please don't simply revert edits made by someone else, as you did at The Playboy Club,[10] without providing an explanation in the edit summary, especially when the person has provided a rationale for their edit. This is regardless of whether it's me you're reverting, or somebody else.[11][12] In the example seen in those two diffs, your reversion was inappropriate as Becky Mode was credited in the episode as a writer. In the case of this reversion, although I explained briefly in the edit summary why this change was necessary, I have elaborated at Talk:The Playboy Club#The Scarlet Bunny/The Scarlett Bunny. Briefly, this edit highlighted the fact that NBC's website calls the episode "The Scarlet Bunny". However, other reliable sources, as well as NBC's own press release, duplicated here, uses your preferred spelling. Since multiple sources, especially NBC itself, use both spellings, we need to list both. You are welcome to discuss there if you don't believe we should cover both spellings. --AussieLegend (talk) 17:23, 27 September 2011 (UTC)

Playboy Club

Is there a source for the Rank? In tvbythenumbers.com is only the first 25th. But "The Playboy Club" rates too low to get into the top 25. -- 91.66.23.88 (talk) 20:51, 2 October 2011 (UTC)

Edit Summaries

I note you have been editing for a while, but feel it's necessary to remind you about the importance of WP:FIES. I also note someone has mentioned the same to you just a few days ago. Thanks. Lhb1239 (talk) 17:26, 4 October 2011 (UTC)

WP:AIV

Hey just a tip, please don't report IPs without any warnings directly to them unless they're for sure IP hopping. It's a bit hard for us to block when people don't know they're doing something wrong. Kwsn (Ni!) 20:37, 4 October 2011 (UTC)

Biting

In regard to this edit, you were way out of line to call that IP editor's edits "vandalism". I suggest you read WP:BITE. We were all new here at one time - a little patience and good faith is in order here, not undeserved wrath and threats of administrative action. And - don't forget: edit summaries when editing Wikipedia are not just polite and show a cooperative editing attitude, they're imperative. Lhb1239 (talk) 04:53, 5 October 2011 (UTC)

In regard to this edit, while it is great that you provided an edit summary (in a sea of your edits that haven't contained edit summaries), it's not great that you chose to finally provide an edit summary and included admonishment bordering on a personal attack. A simple error on my part (or anyone's part) is hardly deserving of the negative and uncooperative editing attitude and lack of good faith you are demonstrating in the above referenced edit summary. I would imagine that you have made your share of editing errors in the past that have either been ignored or dealt with kindly by other experienced editors. Please take their example and utilize it in the future. I'd really hate to have to make more of all this in a formal manner at a noticeboard. Lhb1239 (talk) 23:08, 5 October 2011 (UTC)

Citation titles

Please don't edit citation titles as you did here at List of Ringer episodes. Citation titles are effectively a quotation and should appear exactly as they do at the source. The only real exception to this is replacing fancy apostrophes and quotation marks with those specified by the manual of Style. Single apostrophes (') should not be replaced by quotation marks (") and titles shouldn't be edited to "correct" them. For example, "'NCIS:LA,' 'DWTS'" should not be changed to ""NCIS: Los Angeles", "Dancing with the Stars"". Such edits have been reverted by a number of editors but you appear not to have noticed the edit summaries. Also, and I know this has been raised previously,[13] please use edit summaries when making changes to articles. --AussieLegend (talk) 02:21, 6 October 2011 (UTC)

Edit Summary (as previous from myself and many other editors)

When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labeled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:

The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.

Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field. It is considered rude not to use an edit summary. Edits without an edit summary are subject to being reverted or deleted. I have just reverted your last change to The Playboy Club article for this very reason. Lhb1239 (talk) 13:59, 6 October 2011 (UTC)

October 2011

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Hart of Dixie. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. AussieLegend (talk) 19:31, 6 October 2011 (UTC)

Edit-warring at The Playboy Club

Your recent edits seem to have the appearance of edit warring after a review of the reverts you have made on The Playboy Club. Users are expected to collaborate and discuss with others and avoid editing disruptively.

Please be particularly aware, the three-revert rule states that:

1. Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Multiple editors disagree with you over your personal preference, which seems to oppose the Manual of Style, which I referenced in my reversion.You need to discuss this and stop edit-warring! AussieLegend (talk) 13:49, 7 October 2011 (UTC)

October 2011 - WP:COPYVIO

I have reverted your most recent edits to Pan Am (TV series) due to a blatant copyright violation. Beyond that, I have reverted edits you have made in at least one other article for the same kind of copyright violation in the recent past. Having been here a while, you MUST be familiar with Wikipedia policies regarding the use of copyrighted material? If you are not, I suggest you immediately refer to the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use for all of its projects, not the least of which is Wikipedia. Copyright infringement is considered a very serious violation in Wikipedia. Editors who engage in such knowingly as well as repeatedly are subject to having their account blocked. If you have received other warnings about this previously, things may not work out well for you and keeping your editing privileges. Consider this your first official warning from me. I will be watching for any further violations coming from you in the future. I suggest you cease using copyrighted material from other internet sites immediately. I'd hate to have to report you and/or for you to be blocked from editing, as editing Wikipedia is something you obviously enjoy. Besides, you still have a lot to offer the project and have been (from what I can tell) a rather prolific editor. Please don't screw it up for yourself. Lhb1239 (talk) 23:56, 9 October 2011 (UTC)

NBC Encores

The reason why I'm removing the encores on NBC is because there's no original programming on Saturday night. Who even cares about encores anyway? Just please don't remove the encores! 68.44.179.54 (talk) 23:04, 10 October 2011 (UTC)

Last chance

You seem to be back to not filling in edit summaries again. Missing it once or twice is once thing, doing it over and over again after having it brought to your attention (for practically ever) is another matter. Edit summaries are necessary for a number of reasons, not the least of which is treating your fellow editors respect and courtesy. If you don't say why you did what you did with an edit, no one can understand your reasoning for the edit and the productiveness of it. If you don't give an edit summary, it makes it more difficult to follow which edit is which when looking through diffs. But, bottom line is: if you don't provide an edit summary, you are not editing collegially, cooperatively, and according to Wikipedia standards and accepted practices. I would hate to have to take this issue to an administrative notice board. PLEASE - provide edit summaries! Lhb1239 (talk) 17:04, 11 October 2011 (UTC)

Last chance - part 2

You've also been told not to change citation titles.[14] I explained to you that they are effectively quotations and yet, you still continue to do it.[15] While you explained what you did, you didn't explain why. If it was because you thought it looked better, which has been your rationale in some other edits, you've also been told that this is not a valid reason. You've been editing here long enough to know that we have policies and a manual of style that everyone has to follow. You aren't exempt. --AussieLegend (talk) 20:43, 11 October 2011 (UTC)

Answer to Question

Wikipedia convention is to use one 'l' when spelling canceled in US articles.Theorycreation (talk) 23:20, 14 October 2011 (UTC)

Tetsujin 28-go problems.

It seems some Tetsujin articles have to two corresponding Japanese articles when they should only be one a literal translation of the english article and a second one with a Japanese template of Tetsujin. Tetsujin 28-go (2004 TV Series) and Tetsujin 28 FX are good examples.Dwanyewest (talk) 03:21, 30 October 2011 (UTC)

Desperate Housewives episode 8.10 title

Hey Adam, old ennemy, you don't know me because it's an IP, but we had already have fights in the past with each other. Maybe the episode hasn't got any summary yet but I don't know if you have Twitter, but I have. And Sabrina Wind posted a pic few days ago and there was the title of the episode 8.10 because of the table read with all the actors.

So ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.14.138.16 (talk) 21:58, 4 November 2011 (UTC)

Swamp Thing (1991 TV series)

Hello, AdamDeanHall. You have new messages at Talk:Swamp Thing (1991 TV series).
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Editing comments made by others

Please don't edit comments made by other editors on talk pages, except as permitted by WP:TPO, which wasn't the case with this edit. A single "l" is American spelling. For pretty much the rest of the English speaking world, the correct spelling is "cancelled" and you shouldn't edit the posts of other editors to make their correct spelling incorrect. --AussieLegend (talk) 07:16, 14 November 2011 (UTC)

Harry's Law on Network Schedule

Stop reverting my edits on the network schedule on Harry's Law! The Futon Critic says that episodes will air in January from January 11-February 1! So stop it now, or you may be blocked from Wikipedia! 68.44.179.54 (talk) 21:10, 15 November 2011 (UTC)

2012–13 United States network television schedule

Adam, Football Night in America was renewed along with NBC Sunday Night Football, so STOP reverting all my edits! JUST STOP IT!!! 68.44.179.54 (talk) 23:51, 26 November 2011 (UTC)

Revived Shows

Adam, we had a discussion about the revived shows section on the talk page of the 2011-12 schedule page! I can't take your deletions anymore! Stop it! Somebody block this user! 68.44.179.54 (talk) 01:32, 29 November 2011 (UTC)

Thursday's Schedule on ABC

Stop reverting my edits! I'm not vandalizing here, I'm just telling the truth on the schedule. You're the vandalist here, by reverting everyone's edits for no reason! Stop it! NOW!!! 68.44.179.54 (talk) 01:18, 30 November 2011 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

		The Good Article Barnstar
		Thanks AdamDeanHall for helping to promote Grey's Anatomy to Good Article status. Please accept this little sign of appreciation and goodwill from me, because you deserve it. Keep it up, and give some a pat on the back today. --Sp33dyphil ©hatontributions 02:57, 12 December 2011 (UTC)

Wife Swap

Okay, Wife Swap WILL premiere right after The Bachelor premiere on January 2, so stop it. I'm about to have you blocked soon if you keep up deleting my comments and keep acting selfish. 68.44.179.54 (talk) 01:50, 16 December 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Desperate Housewives, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page VTV (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:19, 28 December 2011 (UTC)

Hasbro Show Edits, Sony and Fox did nothing

Hi Adam.

I'm unsure if it was you that posted the lies that Sunbow and Marvel were owned by Sony and Fox respectively, during the 1980's when they produced the Hasbro cartoon shows, but I'm afraid they were not and I'm getting tired of having to clean up the mess! Now yes, both companies were involved with the two forementioned companies, but NOT untill the 1990's. In the 80's Sunbow was just owned by their creators Joe Bacal and Tom Griffin as part of the Bacal-Griffin Advertising Agency. Marvel Productions was owned by a company called Cadence, that is until 1987, when they were aquired by New World International. Sony brought the Sunbow back catalog (including the Hasbro shows) and Fox did buy out New World, but not Marvel's properties who went to Saban International, but both these changes happen in the 1990's, YEARS after the Hasbro shows were even made. If you want to include ownership into these articles of when the shows were produced then I suggest adding the RIGHT companies Bacal-Griffin Advertising and Cadence, New World International in 1987. But if you really wanted to let people know who owns the companies nowadays then Sunbow has since dissolved (with Hasbro buying back the rights to their entire catalog of shows produced by them from Sony) and Marvel is now part of Disney, but that will just confuse things even more. — Preceding unsigned comment added by David31584 (talk • contribs) 22:40, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

Flashpoint on Ion Television

Stop removing all of my edits for Flashpoint on the network schedule!!! I have proof that it's there: http://www.thefutoncritic.com/guide/. Also, don't remove The X Factor from Tuesday, either! Just because of the World Series, it was there, and everything on the schedule during the season should be there! You are on my last nerve! 68.44.179.54 (talk) 20:34, 17 January 2012 (UTC)

2012-13 United States network television schedule

I saw your question on the talk page of user 68.44.179.54. Now is way too early to have such article. It will be created in April 2012.

Thank you Farine (talk) 22:53, 17 January 2012 (UTC)

Beauty and the Beast move has been undone

The re-make may have been greenlighted, but that still doesn't justify this hasty move; please read WP:CRYSTAL and WP:NODEADLINE. If and when a new series gets made, such a move might be justified; but you're jumping the gun. --Orange Mike | Talk 20:27, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

As a Helper still married to his own Catherine after 31 years, I am horrified by what I read of this; it looks like it will be even worse than 3rd season. --Orange Mike | Talk 17:08, 12 May 2012 (UTC)

Um…

I'm not going to revert your edit, but I would like to point out that "cancelled" can be spelled with two L's, too. And to be honest, I'm not sure why you felt compelled to "correct" it considering it's in a hidden note. Regards, Davejohnsan (talk) 02:07, 29 January 2012 (UTC)

Time Bandits

Unfortunately, your "23:36, 4 December 2011" edit to that article violated WP:ENGVAR. AnonMoos (talk) 08:02, 31 January 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited You Take for Granted, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Derek Webster (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 19:25, 18 February 2012 (UTC)

List of Transformers: Prime episodes

Hi, I was wondering if you think we should shorten the episode summaries in this article.--WikiEditor44 (talk) 22:16, 23 February 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Devious Maids

The article Devious Maids has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Violates WP:CRYSTAL

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hghyux (talk) 22:54, 23 February 2012 (UTC)

TV by the Numbers for The Firm

Just FYI, TV by the Numbers is NOT a reliable source, so don't use it for The Firm again! 68.44.179.54 (talk) 21:45, 24 February 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, AdamDeanHall. You have new messages at Talk:Pearl Harbor (film).
Message added 17:11, 26 February 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

— Preceding signed comment added by Cymru.lass (talk • contribs) 17:11, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 4

Hi. When you recently edited Any Moment, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ashley Morris (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:27, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Secrets of a Small Town

The article Secrets of a Small Town has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Pilot never picked up for series. No sources found.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 08:31, 8 March 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Secrets of a Small Town for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Secrets of a Small Town is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Secrets of a Small Town until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 20:58, 8 March 2012 (UTC)

DH 8

Hi. All spoilers I gave, were right, so I guess I'm like a good source for spoilers about Desperate Housewives. (Actually, the MJ thing was for the 8.20)

Deleted Series

Adam, I'm fed up with you! You have to stop reverting my edits! I did that due to the fear that the series would not air during the season, and I had every right to do that! STOP IT!!! 68.44.179.54 (talk) 22:09, 9 March 2012 (UTC)

Hello

Hello there. I was just wondering something, I put James Denton further up the starring list in the infobox of Desperate Housewives, and you moved him back down to the bottom. I know Denton has always appeared last onscreen as "and James Denton", but the way the list is organized is that the original cast members are listed and additional ones are listed in the order they joined the cast, and by putting Denton at the very bottom it looks like as though he joined the cast in season 8, which he did not. Just thought I would point that out, as it doesn't really make sense to put him there even if he has always appeared last onscreen. Can you see my logic? I understand that some starring lists are listed in the way of which the names appear onscreen, but the Desperate Housewives one is not organized that way, so it does not make sense to put James Denton at the bottom of the list. Creativity97 20:41, 10 March 2012 (UTC)

Hello again, you never answered my question above and I would just like to know what you think. If you could get back to me please. Creativity97 20:12, 18 March 2012 (UTC)

You made a mistake

I had all the right to make a change on the Page "Women and Death" since it's already on the news that Mike Delfino will die on today's episode... You are just jealous that I wrote it first... You shouldn't call yourself a DH's fan... Andrew Beta (talk) 17:05, 11 March 2012 (UTC)

Stop shouting at me.

Please stop shouting at me. I really HATE it when you shout at me! It's embarrassing!! I will obey your orders if you just shop shouting!! And furthermore, I will learn to respect your 2011–12 United States network television schedule. So what do you say? Is this a fair deal? AdamDeanHall (talk) 14:35, 10 March 2012 (UTC)

I'm sorry. I apologize for shouting. It's just that I am very unhappy when someone ruins my work and I know it's right. That's a pet peeve of mine. I can apologize, so as long as you don't mess with my work and it's correct, I won't yell. 68.44.179.54 (talk) 12:02, 17 March 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for creation/2012–13 United States network television schedule

Hey! I'm not here for yelling like I used to be; I'm here for your help. You're the first person I told about this. I'm putting the 2012–13 network schedule under an article for creation, and I would love to have your help there! Don't ruin it, though; I only need improvements to the article with your help. 68.44.179.54 (talk) 13:45, 17 March 2012 (UTC)

GA Thanks

On behalf of WP:CHICAGO, I would like to thank you for your contributions to "Pilot" (The Playboy Club), which has fairly recently achieved WP:GA status.

This user helped promote Pilot (The Playboy Club) to good article status.

--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 19:36, 18 March 2012 (UTC)

Re

Hello, AdamDeanHall. You have new messages at Creativity97's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

An award for you

Golden Wiki Award In recognition of all the work you’ve done lately! 66.87.2.142 (talk) 15:22, 1 April 2012 (UTC)

The Howling

Nice edit at The Howling (film). I didn't even know about the "based on" template. — The Hand That Feeds You:^Bite 22:34, 21 April 2012 (UTC)

You're not god you are not allowed to talk to people like that.

So, STOP. Others have references, you are NOT THE KING. 109.214.216.3 (talk) 22:45, 21 April 2012 (UTC)

April 2012

Your recent editing history at Finishing the Hat (Desperate Housewives) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Toddst1 (talk) 00:46, 24 April 2012 (UTC)

Desperate Housewives

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Desperate_Housewives_%28season_8%29#Edit_request_on_26_April_2012 Thanks. 92.149.84.128 (talk) 14:32, 29 April 2012 (UTC)

WKQX-LP

1.) Redirects go to redirects for discussion. 2.) Since you made the redirect yourself, you can just tag it with {{db-author}} if you want it deleted. I have already done this for you. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 20:27, 30 April 2012 (UTC)

2011–12 United States network television schedule

Adam, I've noticed your changes to the network schedule. I told you not to completely trust TV by the Numbers, but to trust The Futon Critic at times. The cancellations for Breaking In and BFF were not confirmed on the site (if you believe they are, send them an e-mail at letters@thefutoncritic.com). Terra Nova is no longer being shopped. The green is to show the specials for the holidays. I'm not mad; I'm just telling you not to make those changes again, please. Thanks so much! 76.116.112.84 (talk) 00:35, 3 May 2012 (UTC)

Talkback Talk:Nikita (season 2)

Hello, AdamDeanHall. You have new messages at Talk:Nikita (season 2).
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

DarkProdigy (talk) 15:51, 5 May 2012 (UTC)

A Gifted Man

Hello, Adam. As you of course know, the 2012–13 United States network television schedule is coming out. I am impressed with your contributions, but I only question A Gifted Man being canceled. I'm not denying that it is canceled (the ratings were pretty bad), but I only question your source, TV by the Numbers. I usually use The Futon Critic, which is WAY more reliable than TV by the Numbers. Please add A Gifted Man back when confirmed by The Futon Critic and happy editing for next year's schedule! Thanks! 76.116.112.84 (talk) 21:09, 11 May 2012 (UTC)

Ghosts of Wisteria Lane

Hi, I've noticed you added several "ghosts" on "Finishing the Hat," including Victor Lang, Sylvia Greene, Ida Greenberg, and Samuel Heller. Are you sure they were actually included? There doesn't seem to be any cast documents or anything about these characters, nor closeups. I fear by adding these characters the whole section might be marked for deletion due to speculation Small5th (talk) 20:25, 14 May 2012 (UTC)

Possible edit warring on Finishing the Hat (Desperate Housewives)

Hello. I noticed that your recent editing history at the Finishing the Hat (Desperate Housewives) article indicates that you may be starting to engage in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period.

Undoing another editor's work –whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. I already count three separate times where you reverted and removed content regarding Nicolette Sheridan not being in the episode.[16][17][18]

Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Thanks. Zzyzx11 (talk) 01:54, 15 May 2012 (UTC)

In addition, I feel that an edit summary like "The Edie Britt name is forbidden! Taboo!"[19] is sort of inappropriate and invalid, like as if you are not following Wikipedia:Neutral point of view and trying to censor this content. So unless you have a more valid reason, I have basically restored this content regarding Sheridan, and, more importantly, added a citation. Regards. Zzyzx11 (talk) 02:05, 15 May 2012 (UTC)

Removing redlinks from 2012–13 United States network television schedule

Yes, there some of the new shows do not have articles yet, but isn't that the point of the redlinks, to let other editors know that articles need to created for those shows. As a matter of fact, you don't even give an exact reason for removing them. Just saying "Reverted back to previous edit", is not a reason. Having redlinks in an article is not a terrible thing, see WP:REDLINK. QuasyBoy (talk) 21:37, 22 May 2012 (UTC)

Invitation!

Hello AdamDeanHall, I would like to thank you for your contributions to a Grey's Anatomy-related article. Since it appears you are interested in this topic, I would like to personally invite you to join WikiProject Grey's Anatomy! This project consists of a group of users, collaborating to make articles related to Grey's Anatomy better. Our primary goal is to get as many articles as we can promoted to good and featured statuses, by developing, and reverting vandalism to them. We would be extraordinarily pleased if you decided to join our WikiProject, and help make a difference. If you are interested, all you have to do is add this code: [[Category:WikiProject Grey's Anatomy participants]], to your user page, and you are officially a member. If you are having trouble joining, or have any questions, please do not hesitate to ask me. Again, thank you for your help, and I hope to see you as a member of the project soon! {{{1}}}

NASCAR on Fox

Stop adding NASCAR on Fox to the schedule! It is not a show that should be there and I even had a topic on the talk page. Please do not add it. Thanks! 68.44.51.49 (talk) 23:29, 18 June 2012 (UTC)

Kayla Huntington (Desperate Housewives character listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Kayla Huntington (Desperate Housewives character. Since you had some involvement with the Kayla Huntington (Desperate Housewives character redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). You probably don't care about a move artifact, but I figured I'd let you know anyways.LtNOWIS (talk) 00:20, 19 June 2012 (UTC)

The Job (2013 TV series)

Stop removing The Job from the network schedule. It's in the source, and you are vandalizing Wikipedia by continuously removing it. Please do not remove it again. 68.44.51.49 (talk) 19:59, 21 June 2012 (UTC)

Edit summaries

Adam, you have a tendency to use a boiler-plate summary "Reverted back to previous edit" on the 2012-2013 television season article. This summary is occasionally acceptable for making obvious reverts, such as with vandalism, but the majority of the time, it does not provide other editors any information about why you reverted. Please be specific about why you are reverting in subsequent edit summaries, particularly when you're making as sweeping reverts as some you have made in the TV season article. If you need more guidance, please see WP:EDIT. --Drmargi (talk) 20:46, 1 July 2012 (UTC)

Unforgettable on 2012–13 United States network television schedule

Adam, I noticed that you keep adding Unforgettable as a renewed TV series on the 2012–13 United States network television schedule. You are angry when I remove it. Well, you put the renewal on the wrong schedule. It should be on the 2011–12 United States network television schedule. I can see why you put it on the upcoming schedule, but summer 2013 is part of the 2012–13 season. I apologize if I upset you by removing the show, but I just want to help you. 68.44.51.49 (talk) 23:47, 3 July 2012 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) Not necessarily. This is an unusual situation. It was canceled, then later renewed, which throws it into the timeline of the 2012-13 schedule. Regardless, constant reverts with no edit summaries and no discussion on the talk page are not the way to go. Rather than leaving this message for one user and edit warring, you should have opened a discussion on the article talk page. --Drmargi (talk) 02:25, 4 July 2012 (UTC)

AIV report

Sorry, but I declined your AIV report for a few reasons (which can be found at WP:AIV. I would suggest having a discussion with the user before continuing to have a slow, drawn out edit war with them. Jauerback^dude?/_dude. 15:35, 10 July 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Howling II: Stirba – Werewolf Bitch for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Howling II: Stirba – Werewolf Bitch is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Howling II: Stirba – Werewolf Bitch until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 07:01, 15 July 2012 (UTC)

A Response

Posting here in case you don't get the reply on my Talk Page.

With all due respect, please do not shout at me in all caps, it makes you look a bit immature. I apologise for writing the summary in an incorrect manner, but you shouldn't really talk to people like that. If you have a problem, just calmly say that there's a problem and don't resort to SHOUTING IN ALL CAPS with three exclamation marks because it is a bit rude and disrespectful. And while I myself have been guilty of this in the past, I've stopped doing it because I now see it as a bad way to conducting yourself.

In fact, that is something I've noticed with you. You frequently remove any and all edits in the List of Transformers: Prime episodes article without really giving proper reasons as to why. All you type are things like "Reverted back to previous edit" and "Please leave the episode as it was" but don't give very good explanations. Not to mention you do seem to be a bit rude to other editors by shouting at them in all caps when you could sort out the problem calmly and rationally. I'm not saying you're a bad person, I'm saying you could conduct yourself a bit better on here. As well as this, you shouldn't really fight with other editors over an article, or class any contribution from someone else as vandalism. MunkkyNotTrukk (talk) 11:32, 31 July 2012 (UTC)

AdamDeanHall, I need your help!

Adam, I nned your help! It's Trivialist, she keep putting in The Alvin Show and Alvin and the Chipmunks on List of programs broadcast by Nick Jr. (block), and I don't remember seeing those on Nick Jr. Will you report her to the Wikipedia administrations, so they can block her forever? 74.177.44.39 (talk) 01:46, 4 August 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.66.28.47 (talk)

Bateman won at "WWE NXT Redemption"

A) There's no "titles" involved with that show so I don't know what you're talking about there. B) Bateman was the last rookie in the competition. If one team forfeited the Superbowl would they just decide "Oh, no Superbowl this year"? If Romney quits the Presidential race and nobody else replaces him, would they just say "OK no President"? No, people win things by forfeit/acclamation all the time. --TheTruthiness (talk) 00:35, 7 August 2012 (UTC)

The Terminator

Please stop adding Sony Pictures Entertainment to the infobox of The Terminator and other Orion Pictures films. While it's true that Orion was bought up by Sony, this did not happen until the late 1990s, well after these films' releases, and have no bearing on the films' original release details. You've been reverted on this stuff 3 times in the past 2 weeks [20] [21] [[22]; Please take it to the article's talk page for discussion rather than making the same change again. --IllaZilla (talk) 20:20, 9 August 2012 (UTC)

Your recent edits to List of Star Trek: Deep Space Nine episodes

You removed all the part 1, part2, etc notes of the multi-episode stories. In a list of episodes it seems usefull to know which are stand-alone episodes and which are not. MrEvers (talk) 18:50, 26 August 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Inner Sanctum (1991 film)

The article Inner Sanctum (1991 film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable film. No independent reliable refs with in-depth coverage.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stuartyeates (talk) 08:04, 30 August 2012 (UTC)

September 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to Wikipedia. However, please know that editors do not own articles and should respect the work of their fellow contributors on List of Transformers: Prime episodes. If you create or edit an article, know that others are free to change its content. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 02:27, 2 September 2012 (UTC)

Please do not assume ownership of articles such as List of Transformers: Prime episodes. If you aren't willing to allow your contributions to be edited extensively or be redistributed by others, please do not submit them. Thank you. Please do not use edit summaries like you did here. They suggest a ownership mentality with regards to the article. Wikipedia is the encyclopedia that anyone can edit, and by pressing 'submit' you agree that your contributions can be changed in any way by anyone. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 02:36, 15 September 2012 (UTC)

• Also, please tone down your edit summaries just a tad. While not technically uncivil they are not containing a tone conductive to collaborative editing of Wikipedia. And looking over your talk page here, you seem to have had a consistent issue of borderline incivility, ownership issues, and bitey edit summaries. Please listen and change the way you conduct yourself here before you are blocked for being a toxic presence. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 18:45, 15 September 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Arranged Marriage (TV series)

The article Arranged Marriage (TV series) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

TV show that never aired and was unclear if ever would.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JayJay^{Talk to me} 00:51, 30 September 2012 (UTC)

Hi There

I noticed you just undid my edit on Last Resort (U.S. TV series) saying that you were undoing damage that I did? Im not sure what you mean, could you be a bit more specific please? I was just providing a link on Despotism and what it meant. As I for one didnt know what it first meant and was trying to be more helpful to other readers by providing a background link. Thank you. MisterShiney (talk) 21:22, 12 October 2012 (UTC)

List of Transformers: Prime episodes

[23] This edit summary suggests an attitude of owning an article. Owning any Wikipedia article is forbidden, so the attitude of owning an article is discouraged. Just putting it out there. 8-9-1-1-9 (talk) 04:06, 15 October 2012 (UTC)

Bond posters

I'm really not sure why you think it appropraite for a British film to carry American posters, rather than British ones, but please go to the talk pages of the relevant article(s) to discuss, rather than revert. - SchroCat (^ • @) 19:10, 25 October 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, AdamDeanHall. You have new messages at 89119's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

8-9-1-1-9 (talk) 19:20, 28 October 2012 (UTC)

I was not aware of that mistake you pointed out in the summary. (Note that the summaries aren't "yours" or "mine", by the way; they're "Wikipedia's".) That wasn't mine; other editors contributed to episode 29. I was only concerned with the recent episodes since episode 44 "Hurt". Are there still any mistakes with the summaries for episode 44 and onward? 8-9-1-1-9 (talk) 20:03, 28 October 2012 (UTC)

Sure, episode 42. Are there any mistakes in the edit summaries in my revision from that episode onwards? 8-9-1-1-9 (talk) 20:06, 28 October 2012 (UTC)

That was episode 31. I did not make that mistake either; some other editor must have added the information. I'm talking about episode 42 and onwards. If there are no mistakes for those recent episodes, do you mind if I add my revision back in for that portion only? All the episodes before "Hurt" will be untouched. 8-9-1-1-9 (talk) 20:13, 28 October 2012 (UTC)

SW Episode VII

Please don't steamroll the Star Wars Episode VII article with a redirect. As you can see, there is a lengthy discussion happening right now regarding the AfD proposal. Please feel free to participate there. Thanks! MaxVeers (talk) 20:16, 31 October 2012 (UTC)