User talk:AdamDeanHall/Archive 9
This is an archive of past discussions about User:AdamDeanHall. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 5 | ← | Archive 7 | Archive 8 | Archive 9 |
The article The Seduction of Misty Mundae has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Appears to fail WP:NFILM
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 00:24, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
Nomination of The Seduction of Misty Mundae for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Seduction of Misty Mundae until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Couple of issues
1) as per the instructions on Template:Infobox television, the distributor is for the original distributor only not for the current owners or distributors but only for it's initial run. 2) The Template:Small is not to be used in infoboxes per that template's instructions. So can you please go back over all your incorrect television template infoboxes and put the distributors back to the guidelines to save other editors reverting (and losing the other formatting changes you put in.) Thank you. Canterbury Tail talk 12:34, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:The Seduction of Misty Mundae.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:The Seduction of Misty Mundae.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:31, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
August 2022
Hello, I'm KatnissEverdeen. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to The 13 Ghosts of Scooby-Doo have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Katniss May the odds be ever in your favor ♥ 12:46, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
Nomination of An Erotic Werewolf in London for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/An Erotic Werewolf in London until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Orphaned non-free image File:An Erotic Werewolf in London.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:An Erotic Werewolf in London.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:08, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
File:LAFF (network logo).jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:LAFF (network logo).jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. ✗plicit 13:42, 5 September 2022 (UTC)
October 2022
Hello, I'm Mvcg66b3r. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, WFLD, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 21:32, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
Nomination of Monstrous Movie for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Monstrous Movie until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
The article Chiller Theatre (1974 TV series) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:NTELEVISION, lacks any sources or references. Noting IMDb is not an acceptable source, neither is EPGuides.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dan arndt (talk) 09:50, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Chiller Theatre.jpeg
Thanks for uploading File:Chiller Theatre.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. AdamDeanHall (talk) 20:41, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Monstrous Movie.jpeg
Thanks for uploading File:Monstrous Movie.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. AdamDeanHall (talk) 14:25, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
"Kayla Huntington (Desperate Housewives character" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Kayla Huntington (Desperate Housewives character and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 27#Kayla Huntington (Desperate Housewives character until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 19:40, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
- Would you please consider marking it for deletion? The reason for this is because this page is NOT a true redirect. AdamDeanHall (talk) 20:34, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
The CW
Your edits at The CW read like a news article written ny a journalist. It also contains original reasearch where you make your own interpretations. I would be cutting a lot of content and rewriting it. Please be careful in the future. Linkin Prankster (talk) 11:55, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
Nomination of Reckless Behavior: Caught on Tape for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reckless Behavior: Caught on Tape until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Important notice
Hi AdamDeanHall,
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}}
on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Please avoid edit warring at Tanit Phoenix and keep WP:BLPRESTORE/WP:BURDEN in mind. Others have expressed their concerns in response to the ANI thread.
Best regards,
~ ToBeFree (talk) 09:35, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
Unsourced
Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, you may be blocked from editing. Canterbury Tail talk 17:17, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
February 2023
Me and MikeAllen sent warnings to Vidpro23 to stop changing distributors but Vidpro23 never stopped and continues ignoring warnings despite been told to stop. Vidpro23 must be blocked for good. 86.15.93.32 (talk) 17:21, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
- Note the above IP has just been blocked for clear disruptive editing and pushing incorrect distributors and trying to get others roped into it. Canterbury Tail talk 20:15, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
The article That's My Baby (TV series) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Does not appear to be notable. Nothing found in a BEFORE.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 20:56, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
Sandra McCoy edit
I have reverted your addition of an unsourced date of birth and an unsourced birth name to Sandra McCoy. In addition to Wikipedia's basic principle of citing sources (Wikipedia:Citing sources), a special need for citations applies with regard to elements of a biography of a living person (WP:BLPPRIVACY). Feel free to add a date of birth or a birth name when it is accompanied by a citation to a reliable, published, non-primary source. Eddie Blick (talk) 18:38, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
The article Lassie's Pet Vet has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Appears to fail notability, nothing found in a BEFORE. Tagged for notability since 2021
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 22:16, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
Hey! I closed both of your requested moves trying to move articles to this title early because they were in the wrong venue. Neither had any support, but you can still start a new discussion without prejudice or those opposes coming into account by following the instructions at Wikipedia:Proposed mergers; I would recommend looking at the opposes you got before deciding to go through with the merge request, though some were procedural because this was the wrong venue. (You should link the RMs procedurally in your merge nom as a best practice.) Skarmory (talk • contribs) 03:19, 27 May 2023 (UTC)
Elaine Giftos edit
I have reverted your addition of an unsourced date of birth to Elaine Giftos . In addition to Wikipedia's basic principle of citing sources (Wikipedia:Citing sources), a special need for citations applies with regard to elements of a biography of a living person (WP:BLPPRIVACY). Feel free to add a date of birth when it is accompanied by a citation to a reliable, published, non-primary source. Eddie Blick (talk) 00:49, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
- I have reverted your subsequent addition of a date of birth cited to www.famousfix.com. Unfortunately, that source is WP:USERGENERATED. Being user-generated makes it unreliable for use in citations in Wikipedia. Eddie Blick (talk) 02:34, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
...on a similar subject, Najaa News and Happy Happy Birthday are not reliable sources. JSFarman (talk) 23:34, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
I'd also like to point out thefamouspeople.com is also not a reliable source. Which is why I reverted your edit on Catherine Disher. As per WP:BLPPRIVACY there are only a couple acceptable options when it comes to WP:DOB. A truly reliable Secondary source(IE a magazine such as Los Angeles Times or New York Times. And preferably multiple of these) reporting their exact DOB. Or a social media post from the subject themselves where he or she confirms his or her birthday and preferably either his or her age or YOB in the same post as well. Failing either one of those, they should be kept out of the articles.Kcj5062 (talk) 05:40, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:CBS Dream Team 2015.png
Thanks for uploading File:CBS Dream Team 2015.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:08, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:29, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Kamasutra Nights moved to draftspace
Thanks for your contributions to Kamasutra Nights. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and sources used are not considered reliable. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 16:11, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Kamasutra Nights.jpeg
Thanks for uploading File:Kamasutra Nights.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Johnj1995 (talk) 21:51, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
"Team Toon" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect Team Toon has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 January 15 § Team Toon until a consensus is reached. ViperSnake151 Talk 04:35, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
April 2024
Your edit to Spud 3: Learning to Fly has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. Plot descriptions cannot be copied from other sources, including official sources and IMDb, unless these can be verified to be public domain or licensed compatibly with Wikipedia. They must be written in original language to comply with Wikipedia's copyright policy. — Diannaa (talk) 01:15, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Kamasutra Nights
Hello, AdamDeanHall. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Kamasutra Nights, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:05, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
Nomination of Jack Hanna's Animal Adventures for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jack Hanna's Animal Adventures until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Nomination of Jack Hanna's Into the Wild for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jack Hanna's Into the Wild until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.The article Total Zoo has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. B3251 (talk) 22:31, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
July 2024
Thank you for your contributions. One of your recent contributions to WMEU-CD has been reverted or removed, because it contains speculative or unconfirmed information about a future event. Please only add material about future events if it is verifiable, based on a reliable source. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 19:37, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
Transkaroo moved to draftspace
Thanks for your contributions to Transkaroo. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and those sources need to be reliable and independent. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 00:57, 4 September 2024 (UTC)