Vaishnavi Sai Kumar moved to draftspace

edit

Thanks for your contributions to Vaishnavi Sai Kumar. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and Sources are mentions or WP:NEWSORGINDIA. Sending to draft as an WP:ATD.. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. CNMall41 (talk) 18:50, 6 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  JBW (talk) 23:47, 6 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Adghts (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I am currently using Adghts only as I logged out of Zyzwvw but I can't retain that account as I forgot the password. So please remove the block.

Decline reason:

Your account(s) show many of the hallmarks of paid editing. In addition, you are   Confirmed to be evading your block through logged-out edits. I'm declining this request. Ponyobons mots 20:48, 5 September 2024 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

So you admit to being a SOCK AFTER you are caught? There are several other accounts that have been reported at SPI that are associated with you. You would need to disclose which of those accounts you have used (or are using) as well. --CNMall41 (talk) 01:33, 7 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
I have only used 2 accounts and I haven't created any other accounts. Adghts (talk) 04:18, 7 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
And to be clear, for any reviewing admin, you created this new account AFTER being called out for your likely UPE behavior. I am of the believe you knew exactly what you were doing as documented in the most recent SPI.--CNMall41 (talk) 01:34, 7 August 2024 (UTC)Reply


CU technical data shows no other accounts visible at this time apart from this and Zyzwvw. There is a small amount of WP:LOUTSOCK, though, including some attempted edits to AfD's which were disallowed by the edit filter. --Yamla (talk) 10:27, 7 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kudumbavilakku, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Janmabhoomi. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 19:56, 12 August 2024 (UTC)Reply