This is an archive of past discussions about User:Allstarecho. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
Latest comment: 16 years ago12 comments4 people in discussion
I have nominated a couple of categories for deletion, namely the Christian Wikipedians and American Wikipedians. I'm sure they will be deleted per clear precedent established when we purged Wikipedia of those pesky homosexuals, who clearly did not want to collaborate, but were instead only interested in using this noble project for their sleazy sexual social networking purposes. Jeffpw (talk) 09:53, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
Hmmmm. Both categories were closed by an admin as speedy keeps. Does this seem just the teensiest bit hypocritical to anyone? Jeffpw (talk) 10:46, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
As far as American Wikipedians is concerned, it was up for deletion like 2 weeks ago and survived so that one was too soon for sure. Christian Wikipedians on the other hand.. well, who knew Armageddon would begin on Wikipedia as the gay angels and the xtian angels duked it out. O_o Seriously though, Jc37 makes a good point about all of the religion cats needing to be nominated, not just one. And so I will do such because I have been thinking this needed to be done a long time ago. No just because of the gay cats but because of the precedent and the collaboration issues. -✰ALLSTAR✰echo11:45, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
I'm watching with interest to see what happens. While I always knew there were homophobes on Wikipedia, I was not sure about the claimed institutionalized homophobia. After today I need no more convincing. :-S Enjoy the Superbowl when it starts. We don't have it on tv here. Jeffpw (talk) 12:34, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
Nope. The Africa Cup is on ESPN, the English Premier League is on Sport 1, and ESPN has hockey. I'm actually not bothered, since the Chargers didn't make it all the way. I just count my blessings that we finally got the Oscar telecast. Last year was the first time we broadcast it here. Jeffpw (talk) 16:37, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
Holland. While we're very advanced when it comes to drugs, prostitution, gay rights and euthanasia, we're woefully behind the times with the things that really matter. :-( Jeffpw (talk) 16:42, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
En wij willen je graag zien, APK! Maar wacht tot dat het weer beter wordt. Het is vreselijk koud op dit moment. Jeffpw (talk) 16:53, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
Latest comment: 16 years ago10 comments2 people in discussion
Have you stopped woot woot'ing yet? ;-) Thanks for fixing the wikilink on the Navy Yard/Near Southeast article. Do you think there's enough mention about the gay presence that used to be in the area? I don't want to talk about it too much or else it won't look NPOV.--AgnosticPreachersKid (talk) 11:25, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
WOOOOOOOoooot! I've got a special love for the Giants since Eli Manning was also the QB at my alma mater, Ole Miss. On the article, I think it's enough. The only thing I see that will no doubt result in the info being removed eventually, is that there aren't any sources especially for the line which was one of the largest clubs between New York City and Atlanta, Georgia. since that's a pretty bold, fact based statement. ;] -✰ALLSTAR✰echo11:29, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
True, although it was the case. I don't have a source for it, so I'll remove it. But there were at least 2-3,000 people there every weekend...and up to 5,000 on special event nights. Where's the hot guy in the corner? I don't see him. Lemme go slip a lil something in his drink.--AgnosticPreachersKid (talk) 11:35, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
p.s. click the 'something' link and note the vandalism. I'm on it like APK on dick.
How do I register the pix at the bottom of the Southeast page? I've spoken to the woman who took the pix (she created the www.jdland.com i reference in the article) and she told me I have permission to use them...plus her website states it's ok to use them. When I click on the pix, it says they'll be deleted in one week. That's not good.--AgnosticPreachersKid (talk) 11:38, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
I've fixed them. When you uploaded them, you didn't choose a license. No license, no keepy. Also you'll notice in the summary I provided the link to where the web site gives permission. On the Southeast article itself, I added the attribution to the photos because the woman says on her web site's permission page that people can use the photos as long as they are non-profit (which Wikipedia is) and a link back. So I did that. -✰ALLSTAR✰echo12:06, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
The creator of the website, Jacqueline, e-mailed me this morning. She said:
Looks like you did a lot of work! Nicely done. A few quick things:
1. I shouldn't get credit for the Half Street Rendering, nor can I give the rights for it to be used. You'd need to contact Monument Realty (http://www.halfstreet.com).
2. You'll probably want to remove the anticipated start/completion dates for both Canal Park and Diamond Teague Park, as I'll be removing them from my own pages. There's been no movement on either of them, and Spring 2008 is just moments away.
3. I'd prefer that the reference link under the two photos not be to the photo-use.cfm page, which seems kinda tacky. I'd link to the page the photos actually appear on:
On the Half Street rendering, I wouldn't bother messing with the image page itself. Just remove the photo credit from it in the actual Southeast article and then leave it alone. haha *wink wink* ;] -✰ALLSTAR✰echo14:39, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
Latest comment: 16 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
When I looked at your user page and saw "cock" written over and over again, I thought maybe you were trying a bold, new approach to social networking. Alas, vandals had struck again.AgnosticPreachersKid (talk) 14:09, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hi - a word of advice: when a page is blanked it's usually vandalism and reverting is the right thing to do; but it's best to look first at the history because sometimes, as with ADVA Optical Networking just now, the author has blanked his own page. (He'd written an advertising piece; I'd explained to him that WP isn't for ads.) In that case, the thing to do is to add {{db-author}}, which asks for a speedy G7 "author requests deletion or has blanked the page". Apologies if I'm telling you things you know already! Regards, JohnCD (talk) 15:16, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
My Vandalism
Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
(sigh) So much vandalism and weird stuff like that I didn't even remember doing it until I looked through the history. Benjiboi23:00, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
On a lighter note
Latest comment: 16 years ago11 comments4 people in discussion
I want you to watch the video found at the top of my user page. After watching it, I felt a heavenly annointing throughout my body, and my body expelled all of the demons that had been building up since lunch. For those of you that might read this after I change it (I have a new video everyday), here's the link. [1]AgnosticPreachersKid (talk) 22:47, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
Well add this one tomorrow (NSFW). And alright for the IP vandalism driveby. Me thinks it's the sock of whomever sent Jimbo here in the first place. I looked at the IP's contribs and nothing that IP has edited have I been involved in. Unfortunately I can't request a checkuser without knowing who the user was, or a suspected user name, that sent Jimbo here. It's obvious the IP was trying to bait me, probably mad that my block was reduced to 24 hours. -✰ALLSTAR✰echo23:43, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
As soon as I clicked the link, I hit the back button. I watched the 2 girls 1 cup & 4 girls fingerpaint videos, but I've heard about that one and APK can't stomach it. I love watching the reaction clips on youtube though.AgnosticPreachersKid (talk) 23:47, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
Argh there should be a rule against links to pain olympics videos. I didn't look this time, but when I watched it before... I could tell that at least part of the 'pain' intended by the title is mine for watching. 2girls1cup is gross, but nowhere near the same level. Avruchtalk23:51, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
All the nastiness is hosted on the same server. www.hai2u.com, www.blink-182.com, www.lemonparty.com... Goatse is on there as well, that probably isn't even all of them. Avruchtalk —Preceding comment was added at 00:25, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
Thanks. I can definitely see it now although it doesn't really need to be that big. Didn't realize there was a policy regarding which images to use but I've no problem with the ugly black and white one since it can at least be seen now. -✰ALLSTAR✰echo00:17, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
Gracias
Latest comment: 16 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Latest comment: 16 years ago6 comments3 people in discussion
This article has had serious BLP issues and is an OTRS case. Your behavior in the last day or so regarding it and the RFD has exceeded reasonable bounds for discussion and participation in BLP issue debates.
Tone it down. Back off. You can hold any opinion on the article, article subject, whether it should be deleted that you want to, and you're free to express that in a polite and civil manner. Disruptive edits and activities will result in a short block on your account. Georgewilliamherbert (talk) 23:23, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
Where in the world did this come from? George, perhaps you could be a bit more specific? I haven't seen any activities from ASE that could be considered disruptive in any way. -- SatyrTN (talk / contribs)23:51, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
I'm thoroughly amazed at my ability to hack people off too.. especially when it happens and I don't even know it or it wasn't even remotely close to my intention. -✰ALLSTAR✰echo01:03, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
You keep adding "he's a homosexual" along with sources that do not even mention the guy. You've been reverted and warned by several people, including myself. Stop adding the content. It appears to be vandalism. -✰ALLSTAR✰echo23:57, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
Latest comment: 16 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Just FYI - there is a gray banner with your sig at the top of the page that obscures the skin links, at least using Modern. Avruchtalk23:34, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
IAW Wikipedia:Canvassing, the following Friendly Notice is a "Neutrally worded notifications sent to a small number of editors."
You may be interested in a current DRV discussion. This message is to inform you of the discussion. There is no attempt to indicate on which side of the issue you may or should "vote" or comment.
Thus, there has now been a DRV opened. Based on your past edits and comments, you may have reason to comment or contribute to this DRV discussion. Please do.
If this message is in error and you do not have an interest in such a case, please forgive the intrusion and bother.
Latest comment: 16 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion
Hey, Hon! No need to canvas about Brannan - most of us that are interested have the page watchlisted, and the note on WT:LGBT is enough for those who don't :) Thanks!! -- SatyrTN (talk / contribs)21:44, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
Wasn't canvassing.. was informing people who have participated on the article's talk page, which is what the nom should have done. -✰ALLSTAR✰echo21:53, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
Per Wikipedia:Canvassing, I am definitely now convinced I was not canvassing. They were friendly notices, neutrally worded, to a few editors who substantively edited or discussed the article. They were not excessive cross-posting, campaigning, votestacking (since I also notified users who have taken opposite opinions of my own) or stealth canvassing. As far as I'm concerned for Guy and George and anyone else, this matter is closed. And thanks to another editor below for pointing out Wikipedia:Canvassing to me in his unrelated post - which was ironically removed from my talk page by Guy.. but I've since restored. Happy editing! :) -✰ALLSTAR✰echo16:12, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
Warrior (wrestler)
Latest comment: 16 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
You can't have it both ways. If I can't defend Warrior on the talk page, then others can't bash him on the talk page. The talk page is about making improvements to the article, not stating personal opinions about Mr. Warrior. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.202.242.152 (talk) 22:45, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
Firstly, your edits are pure vandalism. Secondly, no one "owns" any article on Wikipedia. See WP:OWN. Finally, stop putting email addressed in articles. Thanks. Have a good day. -✰ALLSTAR✰echo23:06, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
Latest comment: 16 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Hello, Allstarecho ... please BACK OFF on the claims of vandalism when editing this template (which I created, BTW) from an anon-IP account ... I can't test it properly unless I make changes as an anon, and don't feel like switching back and forth in a single edit session ... look at Template Talk:Oldprodfull ... does that IP address on ALL of the signatures look familiar? ... I mean, what's the point of the {{User Alternate Acct}} template if editors ignore it???
Sorry. Huggle doesn't go looking for matches of IP to Username on talk pages. I went and looked at the template manually and also saw another user reverted it as vandalism as well. I took the que. -✰ALLSTAR✰echo05:27, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
The aggressive language comes from the Huggle program, not me. Also you'll see I reverted myself and tagged the article db-g7 as the user blanked the page. Thanks. -✰ALLSTAR✰echo06:15, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
You might like to try {{uw-speedy1}}; I'm sure huggle adds that option. If not, it's better to leave a hand written message in your browser; biting the newcomers can go badly and drive good contributors away. Just a thought. ;) The Evil Spartan (talk) 06:17, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
I tagged it db-g7 which is the template for article creator blanking the page, using Huggle. The warnings on the user's page came from vandalism warnings, which I perceived as such since the user didn't heed the initial db-advertising tag that was placed on the article. I'll remove those warnings. Thanks. -✰ALLSTAR✰echo06:20, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
Latest comment: 16 years ago13 comments5 people in discussion
I'm declining your request to block User:World News International. Unless I'm missing something, he is a good faith user who has been building an article with other people, and the username issues you raised are tenuous (the username isn't being used to promote anything). Whatever is going on with that user and his name, I see jumping to an immediate block as the wrong approach. Have you tried asking him why he's called that? rspeer / ɹəədsɹ 05:10, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
With all due respect, per username policy, that name is a violation of username policy because it's a miss-leading and promotional username. It suggests being used by a group, project or collective rather than an individual and it suggests a company name. Regardless of being a good faith user, the name violates policy. -✰ALLSTAR✰echo05:14, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
Well, I've been discussing the policy, and revising it with consensus, for months now, so it surprises and saddens me to see it misinterpreted like that. Username blocks are there to protect Wikipedia from clearly unacceptable usernames, not to block users for the sake of upholding some rules.
The parts of policy you're quoting require context. "Promotional" usernames are only promotional if they promote something. "Misleading" usernames only matter if they mislead you to something relevant. "Suggests being used by a group, project or collective" isn't in the policy at all, so I don't know where you got that from. And in a case of good faith, going straight to UAA is skipping important steps in the "Dealing with inappropriate usernames" section.
Well, it's definitely mis-leading. When I see a name like that, I think some world-wide news agency, aka company, is on Wikipedia creating articles about gay porn actors. So in that aspect, my reasoning still stands. The policy description I recounted, comes from Twinkle's help section so maybe that issue needs to be dealt with, with Twinkle's owner. -✰ALLSTAR✰echo09:21, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
I'm still wondering what part of WP:U gets you from "it makes me think some world-wide news company is writing about gay porn actors" to "we need to block the user now without discussion". If the name bothers you, since this is a legitimate user, your first step is to talk to them. Meanwhile, it's important to know that Twinkle is a tool written largely by one person, it doesn't define policy in itself, and that when you use it you have to be familiar with the relevant policies. But AzaToth is currently trying to reconcile Twinkle with policy on username issues, and this could be useful information: do you have a wiki-link to the incorrect text? rspeer / ɹəədsɹ 09:29, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
I wasn't advocating the user be blocked, just that name. Twinkle has that option to report usernames for all kinds of reasons without specifying that by doing so, you're essentially saying the user is bad and should be banned. So I'll just drop the issue altogether. And no, there's no wikilink as it's part of the actual in script help. If you use Twinkle, you will see a tiny blue question mark next to the option you want to choose. When you hover your mouse over that blue question mark, it pops up text that lays out why you would choose that option. That is where it says, the name is a violation of username policy because it's a miss-leading and promotional username. It suggests being used by a group, project or collective rather than an individual and it suggests a company name. Again, that's an issue AzaToth will have to deal with. I just won't use that part of Twinkle anymore. -✰ALLSTAR✰echo09:34, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
You're conflating "block" and "ban" -- one relevant thing is that you can't block a username without blocking the user, but most username blocks don't imply bans -- but I think I get the idea. Does Twinkle actually never say that the purpose of UAA is to request immediate blocks? This explains where a lot of frivolous Twinkle reports come from. (I don't know this because I don't use Twinkle myself; having encountered it mostly through username issues, I've gained quite an aversion to it.) rspeer / ɹəədsɹ 09:46, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
No, as far as I have seen, Twinkle does not ever say that the purpose of UAA is to request immediate blocks. Granted, people with a little more experience than me would probably know the purpose of UAA. Apparently I did not. I do suggest you at least install Twinkle and take a look at the sections dealing with UAA so you'll have a better understanding of how the script works. -✰ALLSTAR✰echo09:49, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
Latest comment: 16 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Yes, it's just a hobby. That was one of two phrases in the misguided RFAR which I think strikes a chord. Is suspect we both sometimes take our hobby just a little too seriously, and as a result we can both stray over the line into what Mackensen described as "rhetorical exuberance". But for the record I don't think you are a bad person, quite the opposite. You share with me, I think, a tendency to become passionate about certain subjects, which is human nature.
Anyway, I'm busy for the next couple of days and unlikely to get much time to say a lot, so I thought I'd drop you a note inviting you to a communal hatchet-burying. I don't see why we should be fighting, we're both obviously here for the good of the encyclopaedia.
Final point: you took a beating on IRC? That's bad. Which channel, #wikipedia? Admittedly I never go there because it's altogether too rambunctious for me, but if there was a problem there it may be worth documenting it (and the participants) privately. I know Jimbo and others are watching IRC pretty closely at the moment due to chronic civility and attack issues. Guy (Help!) 09:45, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
Agreed, hatchet is buried. I imagine part of this was not being able to interpret "emotions" in an online atmosphere.. no facial expressions or voice tone to go along with the text. At any rate, it's in the past.
As for IRC, I'm not really inclined to document what goes on, on IRC. I respect the communal socialization that IRC gives as an alternative to "not MySpace" that Wikipedia takes away and am not going to ruin that for everyone, including myself. IRC is a place for me to get to know "you all", as in other users I come across here on my talk page and across Wikipedia, and enjoy some sort of social company while on vandal patrol. That's why I said at Arbcom that I wouldn't go into extended details about it. I know who the people are, they know who they are and I'll leave it at that. Thanks and have a great day! :) -✰ALLSTAR✰echo16:07, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
Oops
Latest comment: 16 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Sorry about the edit to your user page by me, I've reverted it. I will leave it to you to remove yourself from the category since you're not an admin. ++Lar: t/c21:01, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
I've removed the category. Please see the current discussion at ANI here. I am aware it's a humour category, and frankly I didn't have a problem with your previous categories that got deleted, but this can be a category that gives a false impression to editors, and I certainly don't want anybody else being blocked over it. Thanks, Black Kite21:45, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
AN/I discussion
Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Latest comment: 16 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion
What don't you get? It was okay for them to mention the TMZ article. However, it was INAPPROPRIATE to bash Warrior on a discussion page. The Warrior bashing MUST be taken out because it's unfair to people who support Mr. Warrior. 71.202.242.152 (talk) 07:48, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
What don't you get? Let me spell it out for you: d-o n-o-t r-e-m-o-v-e o-t-h-e-r p-e-o-p-l-e-s c-o-m-m-e-n-t-s f-r-o-m a-r-t-i-c-l-e t-a-l-k p-a-g-e-s. I-t i-s a-g-a-i-n-s-t p-o-l-i-c-y. Understand now? You were blocked 24 hours for doing so and now you're right back at it? If you continue, I will take this matter on up the chain and request a community ban. Instead of removing other people's comments, why not contribute to the discussion? Good day! -✰ALLSTAR✰echo08:46, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
Hi
Latest comment: 16 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion
Latest comment: 16 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion
Sorry about that. You are right about not seeing the WP:ANI debate on this. Can you point me to it in the archives? They're a pain to search if you don't know the precise phrase to look for. I've tried various queries, with no luck so far. Thanks, Gwernol18:41, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
Well that certainly explains why I couldn't find it at ANI :-) Thanks for taking the time to find it for me. I agree that there isn't a consensus here, so I won't remove the category again. Good luck, Gwernol20:38, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
Latest comment: 16 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Yes you are defrauding my page so please refrain from doing so. I will revert the text back and please lock the page so it can NOT be altered - Leatherarchives —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.161.189.155 (talk) 22:02, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
I don't know how many times you have to be told you do not "own" the article. No one on Wikipedia owns any articles. Further, your continued vandalism of removing sources and replacing them with your own web site, is against policy. If you revert back, I will take this matter further up the chain. You've been blocked twice now for this vandalism. I will suggest a ban next. -✰ALLSTAR✰echo22:05, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
LGBT :)
Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hey babe! Thanks for the notice! I got this name from a FAAABULOUS ex boyfriend I had in high school. He was the queer (my mom knew before me... go figure), and I was the bubble, but eventually he began to call me his Queerbubble. ;) I will definately check out the project. Queerbubbles (talk) 22:12, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
Userpage blanked and fixed
Latest comment: 16 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Hey, there. Looks like some IP vandal hit your userpage...that's fine, I just reverted it. Still, might be a good idea to recheck your page just in case someone else slipped something in. Cheers, Sandy of the CSARs (talk) 01:47, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
Fun times! lol Yeah, I'm on Vandal Patrol so I imagine several will me hit in the course of my patrol. Thanks for the reverts! :) -✰ALLSTAR✰echo01:49, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
Hi
Latest comment: 16 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hey, you sent me a message saying that my edit to Chicken (food) was nonconstructive. I believe you on that, but only because I couldn't edit the Chicken article to make it worse. See, read this page and you'll learn about what I was trying to do. If you don't have the time to, then I'll just roughly sum the site up: Wikipedia is awesome, but there's vandalism in a lot of places. If we just target all the vandalism towards the Chicken article, then all our problems will go away. I mean, people already know what chickens are. Well, you now have my personal opinion and I hope you will see the light.
Peace out,
Cornmeal Veale for Real (aka Sir Pent) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.115.242.100 (talk) 01:31, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
Latest comment: 16 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion
Recently you moved around some images on Muhammad to get rid of some problem with an image hiding text or vice versa. I didn't see this problem before you did the mods. After the mods, the images as a whole now look lopsided on the right. What browser and operating system combination do you have that shows this problem? Can you get a screencapture of the mess in action? Frotz (talk) 06:30, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
Others have complained about it as well. Here's the screencap:
Okay, I've gotten that to happen if I set the Firefox window to just the right width. I'll take this to the Wiki bugzilla. Frotz (talk) 19:06, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions about User:Allstarecho. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
