User talk:Allstarecho/Archive 5

Contributions by Month User/Talk User Boxes Launch Pad Contact Contribs Subpages Awards Image Favs Statistics Archive 1 ← Archive 3 Archive 4 Archive 5 Archive 6 Archive 7 → Archive 10 The Heaven Project You could have spoken with me first before wasting time on the admin noticeboard, you may want to avoid wasting more time by retracting the AFD youself. How can you possibly think that a movie with those actors attached is going to get deleted? Random Fixer Of Things (talk) 01:40, 11 January 2008 (UTC) Stranger things have happened on Wikipedia before. WP:NFF is pretty self-explanatory. Good day. -- ALLSTARecho 01:44, 11 January 2008 (UTC) "Stranger things have happened" is not really a good reason to open a debate, sounds very close to "I might get away with getting this deleted". Having well known actors makes this obviously notable in its own right, therefore making NFF irrelevant. Random Fixer Of Things (talk) 01:50, 11 January 2008 (UTC) "Stranger things have happened" wasn't my reason for opening the debate. My reason for opening the debate is on the debate page, not my talk page. Discuss it there please. Thanks. -- ALLSTARecho 01:51, 11 January 2008 (UTC) I agree with you Allstar, and said so in the AfD. Peace. — Becksguy (talk) 04:36, 11 January 2008 (UTC) Yes, I had seen that. WP:NFF plainly says future films don't get an article unless notable, as you said like Passion or Brokeback.. media attention about the actual films, not mentions in passing. Agreed! ;] -- ALLSTARecho 09:46, 11 January 2008 (UTC) I also joined in on the DRV discussion. If it wasn't for the general principle of fighting to follow established process and guidelines, I would have given up, as there is almost no chance the article will be deleted this time around. I really think the AfD process is broken sometimes, as some editors just seem to have a different understanding of the notability issues involved, or rather the meaning of "significant", as in significant coverage. I'm assuming good faith, but maybe we need a consensus on what some of these concepts and terms mean, or should mean, rather than what we think they mean. It's just too damn subjective sometimes. Of course, some of them prolly feel the same, but from the other view point. I felt like banging my head against the wall, not that the article is worth that. This is my very first DRV participation, so I'm not sure how it works. Good experience, anyway. — Becksguy (talk) 03:16, 18 January 2008 (UTC) Corey Delaney FYI, there are no legal issues. As I've tried to explain repeatedly before, the servers are in Florida. We are subject to Florida and US law. Furthermore, even the Australian news media understands that this is a big enough issue that they are using his actual name. So there might be a small chance of a legal issue in Australia, and there's none for Wikipedia. JoshuaZ (talk) 18:50, 16 January 2008 (UTC) There have been examples of companies sued from other countries when the product targets consumers of that country. German law has to be considered when dealing with the German Wikipedia, for instance, even given the location of the servers. We also have, via our Wikimedia chapters, legal presence in many of the countries. Australia, for instance, is creating a local Wikimedia chapter. The only simple answer in international law is: "There are no simple answers in international law." ~Kylu (u|t) 20:05, 16 January 2008 (UTC) Er yes, that's true. These things do occasionally happen. But we have pretty minimal risk and again if the Australians have no issue with putting out the name we shouldn't either (if we talked about confidential proceedings later that would be much more likely to trigger a problem, but we have no ability to do that anyways since if they end up being confidential then we won't have reliable sources). JoshuaZ (talk) 21:02, 16 January 2008 (UTC) About jurisdiction, see Dow Jones & Co. Inc. v Gutnick, made by the highest court in Australia. Its' principles are binding on all courts in Australia. Daniel (talk) 06:14, 17 January 2008 (UTC) Hmm, that is interesting and disturbing (although strictly speaking that decision is about defamation so I'm not sure how relevant it is here). JoshuaZ (talk) 13:47, 17 January 2008 (UTC) "(7:0) In this case, involving information published on the Internet in the United States and read in the State of Victoria, Australia, the suitable jurisdiction for a court action is Victoria" — the principle is a general one. The other 7:0 finding in the infobox, I agree, isn't relevant, but that one is. Daniel (talk) 23:09, 17 January 2008 (UTC) Joshua the australian media is not using his name in conjunction with mentioning the legal proceedings, they are only mentioning it in follow up stories about other aspects of the party. With the legal proceedings, he is "än unnamed 16 year old bteenager". ~~ —Preceding unsigned comment added by Viridae (talk • contribs) 23:14, 17 January 2008 (UTC) AfD nomination of Hierarchical Customer Management An article that you have been involved in editing, Hierarchical Customer Management, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hierarchical Customer Management. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 12:08, 18 January 2008 (UTC) Rollback picture I *love* your I already has rollback picture. F'ing great. Maybe cuz I also love cats. BTW, see comment above under User talk:Allstarecho#The Heaven Project. Peace. — Becksguy (talk) 03:19, 18 January 2008 (UTC) You should see all of User:Gurch's cats at this link. ALLSTARecho 14:44, 18 January 2008 (UTC) Did you see this? Crazy: [1] What do you think? Aatombomb (talk) 04:51, 18 January 2008 (UTC) The link is broken.. ALLSTARecho 14:35, 18 January 2008 (UTC) Info The information you re-added was completely original research that's not appropriate for Wikipedia. I'll remove it and place the text on the talk page so people can fix it up if they like--danielfolsom 04:34, 19 January 2008 (UTC) Your signature Hello. Please remove the image from your signature; per Wikipedia:SIG#Images. Thanks, Sandstein (talk) 11:40, 19 January 2008 (UTC) I have to second this request. Signatures containing images are sometimes disruptive to conversation flow, and the can place an unnecessary strain on system resources. You're free to customize your signature using styles (again, within the bounds of the sig guidelines), but pictures are not supposed to be used. - Revolving Bugbear 23:03, 19 January 2008 (UTC) I'm still reading the related guidelines and policies on this matter. When I am done, I'll make a decision as to what I should do in regards to this matter. Thanks. ALLSTAR echo 23:05, 19 January 2008 (UTC) OK, a few things.. Small images do not place a strain on system resources. The one I was using is only 15kb. I didn't start using an image with "disruption" in mind. I saw someone else last night, using one and thought, "whoa! very cool!". So I changed my signature. Wikipedia:SIG#Images is a guideline: a generally accepted standard that all editors should follow. However, it is not set in stone and should be treated with common sense and the occasional exception. I should note "occasional exception" links to Wikipedia:Ignore all rules, which is what I really should do in this matter but it isn't worth disrupting your reason or mine for being on Wikipedia, that being to create awesome articles instead of worrying about someone's signature. After having read through 6 archives of Wikipedia talk:Signatures, I find that Wikipedia:SIG#Images was written with no official consensus. A few people just decided to add those rules to Wikipedia:SIG and no one bothered to call for consensus or challenge the bold additions. The 'See Also' bugzilla link was opened in 2006 and remains open so no official action has been taken there either. I'll simply avoid this war and I have changed my signature, even though again, there is no such official policy or official consensus that prevents anyone from using an image in their signature. Thanks guys (assuming). ✰ALLSTAR✰ echo 23:56, 19 January 2008 (UTC) You are correct that there is no policy against this set in stone. However, signatures have been a point of much contention in the past (most of it actually taking place on pages other than WP:SIG), and images have been one of those things that have been traditionally looked at as undesirable. I'm sorry if you thought that I was implying that you meant disruption -- I assumed you had good intentions, but some editors find it unnecessarily problematic. Cheers, and happy wiki'ing. - Revolving Bugbear 00:00, 20 January 2008 (UTC) Bob Shaloob Hi there. Just in case you didn't see my suggestion on AN, here's a little friendly advice on prods. It's usually best to include a more detailed reason than just "non-notable", and ideally include a link to the policy or guidelines in question. The system was set up to deal with entirely non-controversial deletions, hence the idea that anyone can contest them for any reason, even a bad one. Unfortunately this means that they're often contested by newbies who don't know about our policies and guidelines. When you think about it, "I don't understand how a leader in the green party is not notable" is a fairly reasonable thing for someone to say if they're not familiar with WP:N, and simply saying "non-notable" doesn't do much to help them understand why it's been nominated, or what they can do to improve it. Give them a better explanation, and hopefully they'll either understand what they have to do, or accept that it doesn't really belong. Cheers, Iain99Balderdash and piffle 23:52, 19 January 2008 (UTC) Missionary position If you read the source, you'll see that "whiteys" is a direct quote....99.245.253.106 (talk) 05:44, 20 January 2008 (UTC) Flag behind globe How does one put some sort of flag behind the globe on one's user page? Thanks in advance. Sf46 (talk) 19:51, 15 January 2008 (UTC) Thanks for the help. Sf46 (talk) 23:56, 20 January 2008 (UTC) List of LGBT couples Why did you use Rollback to revert me here? Rollback is only supposed to be used for vandalism. ✰ALLSTAR✰ echo 02:10, 21 January 2008 (UTC) I'm very sorry, it was a mistake. I misinterpreted it as linkspam. Epbr123 (talk) 02:14, 21 January 2008 (UTC) Thanks for clarifying. :] ✰ALLSTAR✰ echo 02:20, 21 January 2008 (UTC) Fair use images Hi ASE, I have removed the faitr use logo from your page header. Fai use images may not be used outside the article space (don't worry, you probobly didnt check - I made the same mistake myself once) ViridaeTalk 03:38, 21 January 2008 (UTC) You stalking my userpage? That's twice today you've had an issue with my content. :P ✰ALLSTAR✰ echo 03:39, 21 January 2008 (UTC) Watchlist :P I saw your sig on ANI/AN anyway :P ViridaeTalk 03:42, 21 January 2008 (UTC) Deletion nomination of Donna Ladd Hi! Someone (not me!) has nominated Donna Ladd for deletion. As someone who has made contributions to it, you may wish to comment on this on the talk page. StephenBuxton (talk) 12:56, 21 January 2008 (UTC) Gamespot.png I replied to your listing, namely I don't think this is the right venue since the image is not tagged as being free. -- lucasbfr talk 16:09, 21 January 2008 (UTC) Hagio Fondren Dude, I left a comment at this cat's userpage after he pinged me about a new effort to challenge Ladd's wiki notability. Reason I am alerting you is that I noted I would defer to your judgment whether or not the battle can be won. Here is the cat's wiki talk page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:StephenBuxton#Donna_Ladd. Apologize for my rudimentary wiki skills.75.66.30.193 (talk) 17:08, 21 January 2008 (UTC) Huggle What version of huggle are you running? (It says on the startup screen) Prodego talk 22:36, 21 January 2008 (UTC) 0.5.7 is the new one out today and what I'm using. ✰ALLSTAR✰ echo 22:39, 21 January 2008 (UTC) It is crashing on me at startup, I can't get past the "connected to IRC message". All the other versions are working ok, so I wanted to see if anyone else had any problems. Guess it is just me. Prodego talk 22:41, 21 January 2008 (UTC) Yeah, no problems here with crashing. ✰ALLSTAR✰ echo 22:42, 21 January 2008 (UTC) Mistake in the config file. :) Still a bug though. Prodego talk 22:47, 21 January 2008 (UTC) Quark I rearranged the table on the bottom of the Quark page to reflect the charge symmetries between the quarks as it is taught in universities. -Eric —Preceding unsigned comment added by Psycherevolt (talk • contribs) 03:19, 22 January 2008 (UTC) Vandalism warnings You know, you don't have to go 1-2-3-4 on each individual vandal; it can be unnecessarily tedious. It also helps to build on top of previous recent warnings: User talk:139.179.90.207. The Evil Spartan (talk) 09:12, 22 January 2008 (UTC) That's the way the program works. Nothing I can do about it. ✰ALLSTAR✰ echo 09:15, 22 January 2008 (UTC) I suggest reporting a bug. It shouldn't repeat vandalism warnings given only a few minutes ago. Or you could try User:Lupin/Filter recent changes. The Evil Spartan (talk) 09:17, 22 January 2008 (UTC) Reported. It's a new program so bugs are expected. Thanks. ✰ALLSTAR✰ echo 09:19, 22 January 2008 (UTC) Gayass-queer Hi, Allstar! I realized that I should have asked before copying: do you sanction the queer version of the userbox? Sincerest form, and all, and I figured the non-gay gayasses ought to have a shiny pretty of their own. Please let me know. We gayasses have to communicate so we can stick together. Photouploaded (talk) 02:04, 22 January 2008 (UTC) Looks good to me! :] ✰ALLSTAR✰ echo 02:06, 22 January 2008 (UTC) I've started a discussion of the recent uproar here. I;m inviting all the other gayasses to join in and see if we can't work toward some unified position to present at the discussion - maybe a move to "Queer" or "LGBT"? Thanks for making the first userbox - it's great! --Phyesalis (talk) 16:26, 22 January 2008 (UTC) Trivia. Might want to re-check this. Trivia sections are discouraged (I'm sure it was just a mistake: in fact, I hit "Q" before you edit conflicted me as well ;) ). · AndonicO Hail! 02:29, 23 January 2008 (UTC) Thanks. Throught it was vandal removal. I've reverted myself. ✰ALLSTAR✰ echo 02:32, 23 January 2008 (UTC) I thought that too, until I saw the user's edit summary. · AndonicO Hail! 02:34, 23 January 2008 (UTC) Wonky edit summary Hi, "Revert previous revision by ____" seems wonky to me; should it say "revert edit by ____" or "reverted to revision by ____" instead? Benjiboi 08:55, 23 January 2008 (UTC) I've never really paid attention to it but yeah, it seems odd. Oh well, I didn't make it, I just use it. lol ✰ALLSTAR✰ echo 09:17, 23 January 2008 (UTC) Actually, it does make sense now that's been pointed out to me. It's a vandal tool that rolls back vandalism so that's what it's doing, reverting (roll backing) the previous (previous after I revert it) revision by the vandal. Make sense? ✰ALLSTAR✰ echo 09:36, 23 January 2008 (UTC) Per the discussion on my talk I think that "revision" should be switched out for "edit". Benjiboi 10:58, 23 January 2008 (UTC) Your userpage  Done OK, all should be well now. Should be no issues for 1024x768 or 1280x1024 screen resolutions. Thanks to you 3 for your input. I've removed the lengthy discussion for cleanup. - ✰ALLSTAR✰ echo 20:54, 23 January 2008 (UTC) Reginund (sp?) As a friendly aside I would consider easing up on calls for blocking his talk page. Users have to work extra hard for that kind of attention and repeatedly asking for action against him could seem vindictive and sadly could build an wikistalker for yourself. They've dug their own pit and will be held accountable. There's an old saying about not wrestling with pigs as you'll get muddy too. I'm sure it wasn't meant in a sexual way though. p.s. I'm working on a bio of the aerialist who joined a male strip show and will let you know if I find photos! Benjiboi 03:54, 24 January 2008 (UTC) You're right. I don't want to give that impression because honestly, I've got better things to do. I just don't see why he deletes my comments and nothing else and further makes his statement by deleting them again after an admin restores them. I've since de-watchlisted his talk page and cleared him from my memory. ;] And "the" aerialist? Did I miss that? - ✰ALLSTAR✰ echo 03:57, 24 January 2008 (UTC) I've got to deal with writing and sourcing some William Donohue content (yuck) but will soon be on to the eye-candy. Benjiboi 04:12, 24 January 2008 (UTC) User:Kvanko and Chris Lauzen I've filed a 3RR report here. I figured I should tell you as you're an involved party. Cheers, Master of Puppets Call me MoP!☺ 05:24, 24 January 2008 (UTC) Wikipedia:Zombies I re-made the image. Like I said, I thought the original was ugly and I wanted to add some things. So, if you want it, I re-posted it like you asked. You can find it at WP:Zombies, along with an essay to accompany the image. ☯  Zenwhat (talk) 23:19, 24 January 2008 (UTC) Hi Zen and thanks for remembering! I wasn't going to press the issue and ask again. As to the image, there's a couple statements on it with miss-spelling. For instance, the one at the top, middle, says "Don't dekete.." Is that supposed to be "Don't delete.." or is that the way you intended it? There were 1 or 2 more but no since in bringing those up if these are intentional. At any rate, good job on the essay too! :] - ✰ALLSTAR✰ echo 13:06, 25 January 2008 (UTC) Three in a row... I'm totally impressed! In a matter of moments, you managed to get vandalized (twice) by a creationist, thwart a spamvertiser (twice) and uphold Judy's honor (twice). Quite an evening's run! -- SatyrTN (talk / contribs) 03:04, 26 January 2008 (UTC) lol and if I wouldn't have got distracted by the cutie at dlist.com, there would have been more I'm sure! :P - ✰ALLSTAR✰ echo 04:48, 26 January 2008 (UTC) AfD of Television Without Pity I've restored the AfD notice on the page as the person did create an AfD page. I suspect bad faith, as these were the user's first two edits... -- Flyguy649 talk 05:51, 26 January 2008 (UTC) Thanks for the heads-up. I thought it was just a vandal adding the AfD tag since when I looked at the article, the AfD tag's link to the article's AfD page was a dead link. - ✰ALLSTAR✰ echo 05:54, 26 January 2008 (UTC) Scientology revert Excuse me, but I'm curious why you reverted my last edit. The content I removed was a NPOV character attack in intent, which under Wikipedia guidelines is a legitimate edit. Daler (talk) 02:42, 28 January 2008 (UTC) Indeed. I advise you to be a bit more careful with the huggle button. Huggle is for vandalism only. seresin | wasn't he just...? 02:43, 28 January 2008 (UTC) I know what Huggle is for. I reverted myself on the edit Daler is referring too and I removed the warning from his talk page. We got this. Thanks. - ✰ALLSTAR✰ echo 02:45, 28 January 2008 (UTC) Good. Now stop beating me to reverts >:( seresin | wasn't he just...? 02:49, 28 January 2008 (UTC) - ✰ALLSTAR✰ echo 02:53, 28 January 2008 (UTC) No problem. I've done it before a couple times too. Daler (talk) 02:47, 28 January 2008 (UTC) I was dealing with a vandal just before your edits and was moving so fast I didn't look to see if it was him again, I just assumed that a 5 second edit made just after I reverted vandalism, was the same vandal again. Sorry. - ✰ALLSTAR✰ echo 02:53, 28 January 2008 (UTC) Youse guys are just too fast for me.... PS - Or should that be: Ya'all — Becksguy (talk) 05:24, 29 January 2008 (UTC) quick draw..:) While I was trying to figure out out the guy messed up on software engineering you reverted! Igor Berger (talk) 12:05, 29 January 2008 (UTC) belgium edit hi, About the ridiculous edit i made to the belgium page. I was just writing that to screenshot it and make a point. I'm a journalism student and currently writing an article about Wikipedia as a research source. Maybe I could ask you some questions too, since you are a moderator. Greetings, me —Preceding unsigned comment added by Allladin (talk • contribs) 12:33, 29 January 2008 (UTC) Ask away. - ✰ALLSTAR✰ echo 12:42, 29 January 2008 (UTC) Pure Reason Revolution I have edited this page for factual correctness. James Dobson did not play trombone, neither has the instrument featured on any of the band's songs. Please stop undoing my changes which have been thoroughly researched. Justpassinby (talk) 12:41, 29 January 2008 (UTC) You also signed your name (~~~~)in the article. Do not sign your name directly in articles. Signing names are for talk pages only. - ✰ALLSTAR✰ echo 12:44, 29 January 2008 (UTC) LOL! Isn't it funny how I undo the edit and you warn the user? Rich! --Gp75motorsports REV LIMITER 13:46, 29 January 2008 (UTC) Which article was that on? - ✰ALLSTAR✰ echo 13:48, 29 January 2008 (UTC) Three, actually. I think the most recent one was Animhorse.gif. --Gp75motorsports REV LIMITER 14:25, 29 January 2008 (UTC) Impressed I happened to notice two adjacent edits, both by yourself, in my watchlist. I was somewhat curious about this, as it seemed improbable that anyone else would share my interests in both nuclear weapon and plastic surgery! Anyway, to cut a long story short, I looked at your contributions and I was impressed at the amount of anti-vandalism work you're doing. I just wanted to let you know. Best wishes, Jakew (talk) 13:51, 29 January 2008 (UTC) Thanks! - ✰ALLSTAR✰ echo 14:04, 29 January 2008 (UTC) Rwandan Genocide I got your message that you reverted one of my edits. This was on the Bibliography of the Rwandan Genocide. My intention is to improve the article on the Rwandan Genocide. This afore mentioned article contains the External links for the main article (which Id like to add as the main article on the bibliography article), while it also contains films to do with the Rwandan Genocide. Id like to tranferr all the films to another article Filmography of the Rwandan Genocide too, like I have already withe the External links still currently in the bibliography. This should be good for the subject in general with a correct dedication of the Bibliography of the Rwandan Genocide to books, and the dedication of all the films to the Filmography of the Rwandan Genocide I want to create. All within the main article Rwandan Genocide. I see also you are a top editor here on the Wikipedia and the thought occurs to me you may be able to help me get this addition article on the fims on the road, so to speak. If you can do this Id appreciate it greatly. Cheers. P.S. Please can you respond at my talk page. WikieWikieWikie (talk) 14:30, 29 January 2008 (UTC) Replied on your talk page as requested. - ✰ALLSTAR✰ echo 00:10, 30 January 2008 (UTC) Pic Image:Loversinshower.jpg wow! superb! we neded something like this. (expecially sience the couple under the waterfall is gone) I hope the models have also given her permission. (otherwise someone will delete it sometimes). I would like to have also something like this (in better composition) or like this scene from Another country. And a naked front-front hugging. reguards Fg68at de:Disk 20:55, 29 January 2008 (UTC) Thank you! I plan on contributing more of my photography to the projects over time. I do have a scheduled photoshoot next month and will see what I can do to get the shots you've requested, although I'm not sure they should all be with the same models.. I don't know how that would look in a single article but if used in different articles, maybe. :] - ✰ALLSTAR✰ echo 00:09, 30 January 2008 (UTC) I don't not know how much models you have. :-) In different articles its very OK. Loversinshower is now in the German article de:Schwul (like gay, but exclusivly male) with 3 pics showing 1.) tenderness/marrige & 2.) erotic & 3.) togetherness = most of gay life. Sex have the "open minded"-peole in there head anyway, when they hear the words "gay" or "schwul". and also in the keyboard. everytime "I don't care with wich sex you go in bed.... " and nevertime: "i don't care with wich sex you life ..." :-) Good shoot! --Fg68at de:Disk 01:51, 30 January 2008 (UTC) Vandalism on wikipedia page "Weitnau" Hello Allstarecho, I created most of the English wikipedia page on my hometown Weitnau in Germany. Now I noticed that it has been vandalised for about two weeks. What can be done about it? I haven't done a lot of work on the wikipedia and don't know myself how to act against vandalism, since you are a vandalism cop I thought you might be able to help. Thank you, bluemate —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.238.58.189 (talk) 22:59, 29 January 2008 (UTC) You're complaining about vandalism on Weitnau but then you go and add "Sven wants to fuck a pig in the ass." to it? Whatever. Anyway, I have restored the article back to its last stable version which removed all the vandalism you and others have left there. - ✰ALLSTAR✰ echo 23:56, 29 January 2008 (UTC) Allstar, I never left any such thing on the page. Why would I? like I said, I created most of the page and I live there, the page is important to me! However, I could imagine why it may look like I left such a message there, I first tried to undo some of that vandalism myself, but, like I said, I haven't done a lot of work on the wikipedia. So I suppose I did not only not succeed, but also left the impression that I left such a stupid message!!! Although I never typed anything like that... so I wonder how that was possible. Anyway, thank you for restoring the Weitnau page. What if these retards vandalise it again? I suppose you don't want to go through this whole process again, can the page be permanently protected? Bluemate —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.80.21.50 (talk) 11:34, 30 January 2008 (UTC) AFA source question Regarding [2], that is great. Exactly what I had in mind. But let me ask this. The wiki page that is supported by the AFA reference says, "The March, 2005 issue of the AFA's Journal contained an article which claimed that raising children as Jews would lead to criminal lifestyles...." True or not true, I just do not see that in the AFA article. All it says was that he grew up in a Jewish house then went on to other things. I do not see in the article that the AFA "claimed that raising children as Jews would lead to criminal lifestyles." I think that language comes from the MMfA article you removed. Because of the heat I've taken on the AFA talk page, would you please consider what I just said and consider how to resolve the issue? Then please either guide me or make the change(s) yourself. Thank you. --LegitimateAndEvenCompelling (talk) 05:22, 31 January 2008 (UTC) I now confirm that material is from the MMfA link: http://mediamatters.org/items/200504130003 In my opinion, removing the MMfA link should also mean removing the MMfA material in the MMfA article that is not supported in the underlying AFA link. Follow this to its logical conclusion regarding all the links in that section and you may begin to see why I thought removing the entire section having similar faults throughout was the best solution, especially where I gave people notice and sought input from the Reliable Sources Noticeboard. I do appreciate your assistance in this regard. --LegitimateAndEvenCompelling (talk) 05:31, 31 January 2008 (UTC) All it took was one word. You should stop focusing on removing the content and instead focusing on improving the content. - ✰ALLSTAR✰ echo 05:35, 31 January 2008 (UTC) I understand. But I was interested in the claims and found they were not supported. So in this case improving the article means removing the unsupported or inadequately supported material, no? Also, I do not think the AFA article insinuates, instead of claims, what the AFA is accused of insinuating or claiming. That is a pure fiction whose source is the MMfA article only. No? I cannot imagine Encyclopedia Brittanica including such a statement and basing it on the MMfA article. I'm sure Wikipedia has a policy on such a situation, I just don't know what it is. --LegitimateAndEvenCompelling (talk) 05:46, 31 January 2008 (UTC) Talk:Code talker How do you know (s)he's not speaking in code? —Animum (talk) 01:42, 1 February 2008 (UTC) Touche' :P - ✰ALLSTAR✰ echo 01:44, 1 February 2008 (UTC) sure? Hi. Are you sure that it's considered vandalism to blank the page that where one is the sole contributor? [3] --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 01:55, 1 February 2008 (UTC) No, that's why I reverted myself. - ✰ALLSTAR✰ echo 01:57, 1 February 2008 (UTC) Woops, my bad :-). --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 02:00, 1 February 2008 (UTC) Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Bluemarine This arbitration case has been closed and the final decision is available at the link above. The indefinite community ban of Bluemarine (talk · contribs) is still in effect, with an Arbitration Committee ban now running concurrently for one year, at which point the community may consider unbanning the user. As a result of the violations of our Biographies of Living People policy that have occurred on the article Matt Sanchez, it has been placed on article probation, which requires that editors be especially mindful of content and interaction policies. irt this, community & arbcom bans apply to any sock of the person who has been banned, so no clarification is required there. John Vandenberg (talk) 04:26, 1 February 2008 (UTC) userbox I hope you don't mind if I "borrow" one of your userboxes. Being a gayass wikipedian is something I'm proud to display. Cheers. --AgnosticPreachersKid (talk) 15:33, 1 February 2008 (UTC) I don't mind at all. ;] - ✰ALLSTAR✰ echo 03:22, 2 February 2008 (UTC) peer review I was wondering if you could take some time out of your schedule to head over to the Heroes (TV series) talkpage and give us an honest peer review. The page has gone through some major changes in the last few months, and it would be fantastic if a prominent editor/contributor like yourself, could head over and give us at the Heroes Wikiproject some sound opinion and ideas on improvements for the page. We have all worked very hard at improving the page, and we need great outside, reliable and trustworthy users to come over and help us improve. I you are interested in joining the peer review discussion with other prominent users/contributors, much like yourself, please follow the link. Thank you very much for your help and your continued effort to improve Wikipedia and its quality! Wikipedia:Peer review/Heroes (TV series)/archive2--Chrisisinchrist (talk) 04:47, 2 February 2008 (UTC) deleting the article about me it was completely on purpose, see the article's discussion page. although i'm sure you don't care at all about what it says. confirmed by the fact that you simply deleted my letter without a moment's hesitation. jay —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jaybrannan (talk • contribs) 10:03, 2 February 2008 (UTC) That's not how things are deleted on Wikipedia. Sorry. If you have issues, discuss them on the article's talk page but blanking the page is against policy and will not be tolerated. - ✰ALLSTAR✰ echo 10:07, 2 February 2008 (UTC) After looking at the article, I think there is an issue with the sourcing for the portion he finds objectionable. I've commented on it at Talk:Jay Brannan. Pairadox (talk) 10:26, 2 February 2008 (UTC) Nevermind, I just saw that you responded to it. Pairadox (talk) 10:27, 2 February 2008 (UTC) Atlantic City, New Jersey Vandalism Just an F.Y.I. I have filed a notice in Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism against User:66.197.244.69 requesting that they be further banned for a longer period of time. Simon Bar Sinister (talk) 08:17, 3 February 2008 (UTC) Yes, I see he has been banned for 5 days. Thanks. He wasn't just removing the casino content but also vandalising the infobox and several of the references/sources with long strings of '''''''''''''''''''''''''' - ✰ALLSTAR✰ echo 08:19, 3 February 2008 (UTC) Jay I hope you don't think I'm being a dick. That's just one of my pet peeves...labelling gay people that don't want to be known as "the gay" person. People that prefer to be labelled or known for being gay is cool with me, just not people that don't like it. But yeah, I think the rewrite Leibovits suggested is ok as well...if that info has to be included. p.s. I use to live in Pensacola and I made my way to Mobile, Biloxi, and New Orleans all the time. I remember reading you're a Mississippian and wondered if you ever went to Pensacola for the Memorial Day weekend festivities, or more importantly, Southern Decadence? I went to S.D. one time and almost got pregnant, so I did not return.--AgnosticPreachersKid (talk) 08:36, 3 February 2008 (UTC) All of the magazine interviews he's been in, many he proudly hosts on his own web site, have sections where he talks about being out and gay - which doesn't give much weight to the notion that he doesn't want to be labelled or be known for being gay. Granted, being gay is not *just* who any of us are but he's made sure to mention it a bijillion times so why can't it be mentioned in an article about him on Wikipedia? It just doesn't make sense to me. Yes, I've been to the festivities in Pensacola. Once, and that was enough for me. The oil slick in the ocean from all the hair spray, hair gel and infinite brand names of lube was enough to give Greenpeace a stroke. As for S.D., I lived in New Orleans for 3 years and *did* get pregnant there! But I put a ring on my baby's daddy and made him pack his bags and move to Beverleeeee.. err, Mississippeeeee. :P - ✰ALLSTAR✰ echo 08:43, 3 February 2008 (UTC) I agree with your analysis of the oil-slicked ocean. The Emerald Coast was more like the Eros Coast. You were lucky to locate your baby's daddy. I've made 7 appearances on the Maury Povich show to find out the DNA results of my baby's potential fathers...but I have yet to locate the proper trick. Banging 27 guys in one weekend was awesome probably a bad idea.--AgnosticPreachersKid (talk) 08:52, 3 February 2008 (UTC) 27 a bad idea? No, just 1 or 2 would have been a bad idea. 27 is one hell of a party and I would have liked to have seen the pics! - ✰ALLSTAR✰ echo 08:56, 3 February 2008 (UTC) thank god i didn't have a digital camera back then...not because of blackmail worries, but because i'd be posting them all over manhunt. remind me at some point to fill you in on some of the S.D. stories. hint: if you screw on the balcony of OZ, you WILL get beads...lots of them.--AgnosticPreachersKid (talk) 09:04, 3 February 2008 (UTC) ..he says as if I don't already know. lol You'll get a lot of things if you screw on the balcony of OZ, not just beads. :P - ✰ALLSTAR✰ echo 09:10, 3 February 2008 (UTC) I love crab cakes. Ohhhhh, wait a sec. That article is talking about something else.--AgnosticPreachersKid (talk) 09:14, 3 February 2008 (UTC) I was going to respond to your comment about a young gay cub by linking to a picture of one. When i did a Google image search with those three words (young gay cub), for some reason one of the pictures was Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. Maybe there really ARE gays in Iran.--AgnosticPreachersKid (talk) 16:09, 3 February 2008 (UTC) You know he's got starving house boys shacked all up in the many palaces and they are cleaning more than his windows. - ✰ALLSTAR✰ echo 16:13, 3 February 2008 (UTC) Archive 1 ← Archive 3 Archive 4 Archive 5 Archive 6 Archive 7 → Archive 10