A page you started (Reflektor (song)) has been reviewed!

edit

Thanks for creating Reflektor (song), Andise1!

Wikipedia editor MrBauer24 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Good start :)

To reply, leave a comment on MrBauer24's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

A page you started (Major League (band)) has been reviewed!

edit

Thanks for creating Major League (band), Andise1!

Wikipedia editor SparrowHK just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Nice Work!

To reply, leave a comment on SparrowHK's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

A page you started (Mike Tompkins (musician)) has been reviewed!

edit

Thanks for creating Mike Tompkins (musician), Andise1!

Wikipedia editor Lstanley1979 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Nice article. Given it a bit of a copy-edit and added WP templates, but nice work!

To reply, leave a comment on Lstanley1979's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

A page you started (Kalin and Myles) has been reviewed!

edit

Thanks for creating Kalin and Myles, Andise1!

Wikipedia editor Lstanley1979 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Great stuff. Just made a correction to a reference, but nice work.

To reply, leave a comment on Lstanley1979's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

LOOKING FOR SUPPORT FOR THE NEXT ARTICLE (PUNK MUSIC)

edit

User:Andise1 Please check my colleague's article "Grind History" and you will see that his work is not valued as it should be: [[1]]

Greetings to you, I am seeking support for the general definition of Grindcore based on the increase in information on "precursors" [[2]] made by the user "Grind History" on the "Grindcore" page.

I know "Grind History" we both attend the same university, we have a group of "Grindcore. He told me the unfair treatment he received from Issan Sumisu for not valuing his work, now I am looking for support for this definition made by Likewise as Issan Sumisu seeks support from administrators. I try to help him by looking for people to support the "Grind History" article and see the research that he did citing 3 books, interviews. I wanted to mention that Grind History created the page " Atavistic "which was closed by an administrator saying that it" never existed "however this is written on the page of" Napalm Death ".

Some time ago, about 1 year ago I wanted to edit the Grindcore page but without any bibliographic citation to support me. Now for that reason they think they have "suspicions" that I am a "sockpuppetry" from "Grind History", however I passed THE CHEKUSER TEST therefore I am not a puppet of Grind History. Unfortunately my friend made "sockppupet" with different accounts. However, his work does not have any errors.: [[3]]

LOOKING FOR SUPPORT FOR THE NEXT ARTICLE

edit

User:Andise1 Please check my colleague's article "Grind History" and you will see that his work is not valued as it should be: [[ https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Grindcore&oldid=1022727510]]

Greetings to you, I am seeking support for the general definition of Grindcore based on the increase in information on "precursors" [[4]] made by the user "Grind History" on the "Grindcore" page.

I know "Grind History" we both attend the same university, we have a group of "Grindcore. He told me the unfair treatment he received from Issan Sumisu for not valuing his work, now I am looking for support for this definition made by Likewise as Issan Sumisu seeks support from administrators. I try to help him by looking for people to support the "Grind History" article and see the research that he did citing 3 books, interviews. I wanted to mention that Grind History created the page " Atavistic "which was closed by an administrator saying that it" never existed "however this is written on the page of "Napalm Death"

Some time ago, about 1 year ago I wanted to edit the Grindcore page but without any bibliographic citation to support me. Now for that reason they think they have "suspicions" that I am a "sockpuppetry" from "Grind History", however I passed THE CHEKUSER TEST therefore I am not a puppet of Grind History. Unfortunately my friend made "sockppupet" with different accounts. However, his work does not have any errors.: [[5]]

Deletion discussion about Dummy (band)

edit

Hello Andise1, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Dummy (band), should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dummy (band).

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Cabrils}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Cabrils (talk) 03:26, 13 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Suez bus crash for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Suez bus crash is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Suez bus crash until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Thebiguglyalien (talk) 19:59, 15 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:15, 19 November 2024 (UTC)Reply