Welcome!

edit

Hi Annuxsing! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Djm-leighpark (talk) 06:48, 3 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Using copyrighted material

edit

  Hello Annuxsing! Your additions to Snow Angels (novel) have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

  • You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
  • Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
  • We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. All other images must be made available under a free and open license that allows commercial and derivative reuse to be used on Wikipedia.
  • If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
  • Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Wikipedia:Translation#How to translate. See also Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. —ShelfSkewed Talk 13:06, 4 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for informed Annuxsing (talk) 13:22, 4 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Citing sources

edit

Hello. When adding material, it's always necessary to cite a reliable source. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources, it's very easy or even automatic to add citations if you're citing a webpage, you just need the URL. Thank you :) – Thjarkur (talk) 18:50, 4 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of E. Joseph Cossman

edit
 

The article E. Joseph Cossman has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No signs of notability per WP:BIO nor WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. CommanderWaterford (talk) 18:43, 5 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Help me to improve this please dont deleteAnnuxsing (talk) 19:11, 5 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Copyvio on E. Joseph Cossman

edit

Part of this article was directly copied from the LA Times. As you have already been warned on this, you should be aware that more copyvio will likely lead to you being blocked from editing.--- Possibly (talk) 18:55, 5 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Shah Mehmood Jaan Qadri

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Shah Mehmood Jaan Qadri requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://alahazrat.net/tag/personalities-english/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. CommanderWaterford (talk) 19:47, 5 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

edit

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day Quality Title Tagged with…
139   Anne-Marie Trevelyan (talk) Add sources
90   Greg Hands (talk) Add sources
48   Irene Rich (talk) Add sources
1,385   Politics of the United Kingdom (talk) Add sources
105   Brexit negotiations (talk) Add sources
54   Liverpool College (talk) Add sources
123   Exercise Cygnus (talk) Cleanup
5,375   Iraq War (talk) Cleanup
81   Welfare in New Zealand (talk) Cleanup
184   Premiership of Boris Johnson (talk) Expand
1,052   Environmental issues (talk) Expand
4,555   Brexit (talk) Expand
98   Will Kymlicka (talk) Unencyclopaedic
5   Takashi Uesugi (talk) Unencyclopaedic
284   James Cleverly (talk) Unencyclopaedic
55   Borough of Hartlepool (talk) Merge
32   Means-tested benefit (talk) Merge
17   Fish for finance (talk) Merge
14   Anne Kristen (talk) Wikify
345   Alexander Nix (talk) Wikify
390   Breeches (talk) Wikify
4   Social security in the Republic of Ireland (talk) Orphan
2   Learning and skills in England (talk) Orphan
5   MyCarCheck (talk) Orphan
7   Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Innovation (talk) Stub
25   Susan Acland-Hood (talk) Stub
27   National Insurance Act 1946 (talk) Stub
78   Minister for the Union (talk) Stub
18   Education and Skills Funding Agency (talk) Stub
16   Scottish Affairs Select Committee (talk) Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:20, 6 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Leonardo Borgioli

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Leonardo Borgioli requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://saci-florence.edu/leonardo-borgioli. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Fram (talk) 13:49, 6 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of 2 mot 1

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on 2 mot 1 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://m.imdb.com/title/tt0190894/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Fram (talk) 13:51, 6 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Shah Mehmood Jaan Qadri

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Shah Mehmood Jaan Qadri requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://noorialqadiri.tumblr.com/post/166733760697/very-few-people-know-that-hadrat-mawlana-mehmood. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Fram (talk) 13:54, 6 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Ross Fisher (cinematographer)

edit
 

The article Ross Fisher (cinematographer) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Notably not established

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ThurstonMitchell (talk) 14:02, 6 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Madeline "Maddie" Graham moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, Madeline "Maddie" Graham, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. --- Possibly (talk) 07:00, 7 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

hello. Half of the short article you wrote on Maddie Graham was a direct copy from the NPR article. Please do not copy like that. I will leave you a message next about how to avoid copyvio. --- Possibly (talk) 07:02, 7 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

April 2021

edit

  One of your recent edits has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. --- Possibly (talk) 07:03, 7 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

edit

Again, you have copyvio in World Durood Day. And the references go after the punctuation.--- Possibly (talk) 16:35, 7 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Please don't copy material you find elsewhere online

edit
 

Hello. I am Diannaa and I am a Wikipedia administrator. Prose you find online is almost always copyright, and cannot be copied here; it's against the copyright policy of this website to do so. All prose must be written in your own words. The Wikipedia copyright policy and its application are complex matters, and you should not edit any more until you have taken the time to read and understand our copyright policy. There's a simplified version of our copyright rules at Wikipedia:FAQ/Copyright. Further copyright issues will result in you being blocked from editing. — Diannaa (talk) 19:09, 7 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Thanks you Diannaa Annuxsing (talk) 05:45, 8 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Continuing contribution issues

edit

  Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Akhtar Raza Khan. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. I am not investigating deeper into what combination of spam, deliberate disruptiveness and competency your recent contribution to this article was but it seems to adding to history problematic editing. Unfortunately it seems highly probable you are heading towards a permanent block unless the quality of your contributions change. Thankyou Djm-leighpark (talk) 08:37, 9 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for information Annuxsing (talk) 12:45, 9 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Aala Hazrat Sufi Mission moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, Aala Hazrat Sufi Mission, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. You also have a clear conflict of iterest. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. --- Possibly (talk) 05:42, 10 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Tnis was moved ot draft, since you have stated on your user page that you work there. Please use the AFC process for this article, as you have a WP:COI. Press the submit button when you are ready.05:44, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Group of Thirty
added a link pointing to International
Satrae
added a link pointing to Independent
St. Michael's Church, Prudnik
added a link pointing to Church

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:50, 11 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for a great information Annuxsing (talk) 05:57, 11 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Adelino Sitoy
added links pointing to Bill, Coordination and Appointment
Group of Thirty
added a link pointing to International
Love Is the Look You're Looking for (song)
added a link pointing to American

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:54, 18 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Siege artillery in the American Civil War, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Civil War.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:54, 25 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Shah Mehmood Jaan Qadri moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, Shah Mehmood Jaan Qadri, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 09:23, 6 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Madeline "Maddie" Graham (May 24)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Pbrks was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Pbrks (talk) 21:04, 24 May 2021 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Annuxsing! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Pbrks (talk) 21:04, 24 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Shah Mehmood Jaan Qadri

edit

  Hello, Annuxsing. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Shah Mehmood Jaan Qadri, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:01, 6 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Aala Hazrat Sufi Mission

edit

  Hello, Annuxsing. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Aala Hazrat Sufi Mission, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:06, 8 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Madeline "Maddie" Graham

edit

  Hello, Annuxsing. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Madeline "Maddie" Graham, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:01, 24 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:04, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Madeline "Maddie" Graham

edit
 

Hello, Annuxsing. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Madeline "Maddie" Graham".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 21:33, 24 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Muslim agenda

edit

I have concerns including POV concerns over the article you created in mainspace. Particularly as the articles has problems which may make it unsuitable for mainspace and because you have removed a {{POV}} with no explanation other than as a typo at Special:Diff/1067229004 . With no discussion I have determined it is more appropriate for this to go via AFC in draftspace when I have submitted it for review. I would request all foreign language citations are fully elaborated with use of trans-title, quote and trans-quote parameters especially given the apparent data farming and cookie dropping of some of the sources when visited. You may also which to consider making the title move specific. Thankyou. Djm-leighpark (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 14:29, 22 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Muslim agenda (January 22)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 14:59, 22 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Shahabuddin Razvi

edit

Hello. You do not appear familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. In particular, Wikipedia requires citations to reliable and authoritative third-party sources. Two good sets of Wikipedia guidelines that I have found really useful can be found HERE, regarding verifiability and HERE, regarding the need to maintain a neutral point of view. According to WP:VERIFY, "Any material that needs a source but does not have one may be removed." It also says: "All content must be verifiable. The burden to demonstrate verifiability lies with the editor who adds or restores material, and it is satisfied by providing an inline citation to a reliable source that directly supports the contribution." Best regards, George Custer's Sabre (talk) 06:18, 30 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Shahabuddin Razvi

edit

You seem intent on trying to create a fan page. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, which means that it needs to remain neutral in tone, factually correct, and well referenced. You can't add anything to a page, even if it pertains to a notable person. You can only add notable events and other information. You can't add trivia. George Custer's Sabre (talk) 04:05, 6 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your Shahabuddin Razvi forked article

edit

I am concerned about your duplicate fork of Shahabuddin Razvi when Draft:Shahabuddin Razvi, created on on 18:01, 2 April 2008‎ by Saq mso and incubated on 20:33, 24 January 2022 by @Celestina007:. Celestina007, Annuxsing: to state matters bluntly I am neither impressed by the draftification on an historic article which circumvented an AfD discussion nor the unnecessary fork of a new incarnation of the article used to circumvent the incubatation and ignoring previous contributions over many years. Please discuss this and agree between yourselves a resolution or expect it to be formally taken to a noticeboard. Thankyou. Djm-leighpark (talk) 08:07, 8 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Shahabuddin Razvi

edit

Current events still have to be notable to be included in Wikipedia. I have asked an experienced editor for an opinion. I will convey his answer. That might help both of us. Best regards, George Custer's Sabre (talk) 03:54, 14 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Aliyaanwar for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aliyaanwar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aliyaanwar until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Fram (talk) 12:19, 29 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of World Durood Day

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on World Durood Day requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/World Durood Day. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. PRAXIDICAE🌈 16:21, 27 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Shah Mehmood Jaan Qadri for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shah Mehmood Jaan Qadri is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shah Mehmood Jaan Qadri until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Mccapra (talk) 21:11, 29 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Contact Me KhanQadriRazvi (talk) 06:09, 26 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Muslim agenda

edit

  Hello, Annuxsing. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Muslim agenda, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:08, 29 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Muslim agenda

edit
 

Hello, Annuxsing. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Muslim agenda".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 23:05, 3 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:49, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Sunni Community Wikimedia

edit

Hello, I got to know that you are connected to articles related to sufism and Sunnism. Please be a Member of Sunni Community Wikimedia. —|Syed Aala Qadri Kalkatvi (talk) 12:29, 16 June 2023 (UTC)|Reply

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

February 2024

edit

Hey Annuxsing, could you please help me on this Draft:Dargah Ustad E Zaman Trust. Thank you - BrownCanary61 (talk) 12:19, 29 February 2024 (UTC)Reply