Invitation

edit
 
Hello! Anuragpanuly, Hi, I’d like to invite you to join other new editors and friendly hosts at the Teahouse. There you can meet people, ask questions and learn more about the English Wikipedia. Please take a look! You can also ask me any questions about editing—just click on the green "(talk)" link. Tony (talk) 02:52, 24 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Your Teahouse Question Has Been Answered!

edit

I have answered your question in Teahouse here. If you think that does not answer your question, feel free to inform me! --Tito Dutta (Send me a message) 15:51, 26 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

May 2012

edit

  Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to List of schools in India. While objective prose about beliefs, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. TNXMan 15:06, 1 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

Please fill out our brief Teahouse guest survey

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedian, the hardworking hosts and staff at WP:Teahouse would like your feedback! We have created a brief survey meant to help us better understand the experience of new editors on Wikipedia. You are being selected to participate in our survey because you edited the Teahouse Questions or Guests pages sometime in the last few months.

Click here to be taken to the survey site.

The survey should take less than 10 minutes to complete. We really appreciate your feedback, and we look forward to your next vist to the Teahouse!

Happy editing,

J-Mo, Teahouse host

This message was sent via Global message delivery on 00:26, 22 May 2012 (UTC)

Welcome

edit

Hello Anuragpanuly and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your contributions, such as the ones to Ram Navami riots, do not conform to our policies. For more information on this, see Wikipedia's policies on vandalism and limits on acceptable additions. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the sandbox (but beware that the contents of the sandbox are deleted frequently) rather than in articles.

If you still have questions, there is a Help desk, or you can click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia.

I hope you enjoy editing and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! Kautilya3 (talk) 17:13, 15 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hello Kautilya3,
Could you please elaborate and help me in understanding that how the removal of a word "militant" from the "Ram Navami riots" page does not conform to your policies.
Regards,
Anurag Anuragpanuly (talk) 17:27, 15 April 2022 (UTC)Reply
Wikipedia is written based on reliable sources. You can't insert your own opinions into it.
Moreover, you were modiying a direct quote from a source, which is absolutely prohibited!
Also, reinstating an edit that has been already rejected once consitutes WP:edit warring.
You are still new here. But if you persist with these practices, you will get sanctioned. Please read through the five pillars articles above. Or at least take WP:TWA tour. Not knowing policies cannot be used as grounds for misconduct. All the blue links in this message are links to policies. When informed, you need to learn about them. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 01:13, 16 April 2022 (UTC)Reply
Dear Kautilya3,
Though I am not new but still I WARN you of putting up vandalizing data over the Internet without any fact backing or source. I am not sure in what capacity you are trying to threaten me of sanctioning.
So, please share the source or link to the source from where you have picked up this kind of information referring anyone "Militant" and tweaking the term "riots" as "militancy".
Regards,
Anurag Anuragpanuly (talk) 11:29, 16 April 2022 (UTC)Reply
I have told you that you have modified reliably sourced content based on your own opinions. That cannot be done.
Bishonen, can you explain to this editor that he/she is on the wrong track? -- Kautilya3 (talk) 14:37, 16 April 2022 (UTC)Reply
  • This account and several others have been removing reliably sourced content from Ram Navami riots and inserting their own unsourced opinions, neither of which is allowed. Since they all seem uninterested in Wikipedia's rules in this regard, I have semiprotected the article. Anuragpanuly, please note that if necessary, accounts that ignore our policies can also be blocked. Bishonen | tålk 15:12, 16 April 2022 (UTC).Reply
    You mean to say that correcting a radicalized content in the Article and make it more neutral is violation of Wiki policies?
    The only thing I am asking is the genuine source of your article please share that and put this discussion to rest. Anuragpanuly (talk) 17:33, 16 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

ARBIPA sanctions alert

edit

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Kautilya3 (talk) 01:14, 16 April 2022 (UTC)Reply