June 2021

edit

  Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions; however, it appears you may have written a Wikipedia article, or a draft for a Wikipedia article, about yourself, at Draft:Azizul Hakim Ashik. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – please see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see Wikipedians with articles). If you wish to add to or change an existing article about yourself, you are welcome to propose the changes by visiting the article's talk page. Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: Why was the page I created deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss this with the deleting administrator. Thank you. Helen (let’s talk) 00:25, 26 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Azizul Hakim Ashik

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Azizul Hakim Ashik, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:19, 26 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Azizul Hakim Ashik (July 2)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Nearlyevil665 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
nearlyevil665 17:51, 2 July 2021 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Azizulhakim.ashik! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! nearlyevil665 17:51, 2 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Azizul Hakim Ashik

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Azizul Hakim Ashik, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Vinegarymass911 (talk) 04:20, 3 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

October 2021

edit
 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Tahsan Rahman Khan have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 21:35, 20 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not add or change content, as you did at Azizul Hakim, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 18:46, 21 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did at Azizul Hakim Ashik, you may be blocked from editing. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 19:26, 21 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove an Articles for deletion notice or a comment from an AfD discussion, as you did at Azizul Hakim Ashik. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 19:48, 21 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove an Articles for deletion notice or a comment from an AfD discussion, as you did at Azizul Hakim Ashik. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 19:55, 21 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions; however, it appears you may have written a Wikipedia article, or a draft for a Wikipedia article, about yourself, at Azizul Hakim Ashik. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – please see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see Wikipedians with articles). If you wish to add to or change an existing article about yourself, you are welcome to propose the changes by visiting the article's talk page. Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: Why was the page I created deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss this with the deleting administrator. Thank you. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 20:00, 21 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove an Articles for deletion notice or a comment from an AfD discussion, as you did at Azizul Hakim Ashik. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 20:11, 21 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Azizul Hakim Ashik for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Azizul Hakim Ashik is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Azizul Hakim Ashik until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 18:52, 21 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Managing a conflict of interest

edit

  Hello, Azizulhakim.ashik. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Azizul Hakim Ashik, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 19:27, 21 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

afd Tag

edit

Hello I'm Chip3004 In regards to Azizul Hakim Ashik What part do part do you not understand? It Said not to do not remove this notice (afd tag) before the discussion is closed and do not blank the page. if you don't stop removing afd tag in Azizul Hakim Ashik, most likely you will be blocked from editing by an admin, If you want to be prevented from being blocked from editing, I suggest that you stop this nonsense at once or you will be blocked from editing by an admin. Chip3004 (talk) 20:17, 21 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing Azizul Hakim Ashik for disruptive WP:COI edits including repeated removal of an AfD template.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 21:43, 21 October 2021 (UTC)Reply
As you have evaded your block, I have modified your block to site-wide.-- Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 17:19, 28 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Azizul Hakim Ashik

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Azizul Hakim Ashik, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 15:44, 28 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Unblock Me

edit
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Azizulhakim.ashik (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Hello, unfortunately my IP address or username has been blocked by mistakenly on Wikipedia. My IP address is 103.239.254.139 & my username is azizulhakim.ashik. Yesterday I was creating a page of myself from my laptop. After submitting the page has been speedy deleted & I have seen a blocking notification & it has no expiry date.So Im confirming that, my IP address or username blocked due to mistake. Please unblock my account or IP. I will work very carefully in the future inshaAllah :) Azizulhakim.ashik (talk) 00:37, 29 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

My use of the checkuser tool indicates you have abused multiple accounts. PhilKnight (talk) 05:16, 29 October 2021 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Azizulhakim.ashik (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Unfortunately I used multiple account from my same device. Its my very big mistake. I understand my mistake. Im sorry for that reason. Please unblock me. Im promising that I will don't use multiple account farther

Decline reason:

Previously, you claimed you were blocked by mistake. Now you are claiming it wasn't a mistake after all. Additionally, you note you've been writing about yourself. You don't seem to understand how inappropriate this is. Either way, I see no path for you to be unblocked at this time. Your best bet is to go six months with zero edits, then apply under WP:SO. At that time, you'll need to convince us you understand why your edits were inappropriate and tell us what you plan to write about instead. Yamla (talk) 10:19, 29 October 2021 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I've removed the duplicate requests, only one request is needed at a time. 331dot (talk) 08:31, 29 October 2021 (UTC)Reply