July 2019

edit

  Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Tennessee State Route 107, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Viewratio (talk) 15:24, 6 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

BDAN88, you are invited to the Teahouse!

edit
 

Hi BDAN88! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like John from Idegon (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:12, 6 July 2019 (UTC)

Ways to improve Tennessee State Route 105

edit

Hello, BDAN88,

Thanks for creating Tennessee State Route 105! I edit here too, under the username Willsome429 and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

While I do believe the topic is notable enough to have a page there need to be more sources and less swaths of unsourced content (Obion/Dyer Counties, Gibson County).

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Willsome429}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Willsome429 (say hey or see my edits!) 12:17, 24 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Hello Willsome 429,

Thank you for the suggestion but the references go for the entire article, not just the Carroll County section. But, thank you for being very kind about this.

Sincerely, BDAN88.

Bold text outside of the lead

edit

Please stop using boldface text in the route description section of a highway article. Our Manual of Style, specifically MOS:BOLD, says that we shouldn't use boldface text outside of the lead section. I get that other articles do that, but they're wrong and should be changed. Imzadi 1979  23:38, 29 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Tennessee State Route 339 for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tennessee State Route 339 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tennessee State Route 339 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Interstellarity (talk) 13:54, 10 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Can you please explain to me why my article has been nominated deletion. I really do think you mean well but can you at least give it a chance. It didn’t even last 3 minutes before you proposed it for deletion. I am from East Tennessee, born and raised, and this is a particular passion of mine to provide a complete list of articles on every state route in Tennessee, especially in this part of the state, as it is done in other states. Please don’t delete this.

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tennessee State Route 125, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chickasaw State Park (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:49, 22 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tennessee State Route 194 has been accepted

edit
 
Tennessee State Route 194, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Bkissin (talk) 18:12, 7 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

A wish list

edit

You've been creating a lot of new articles on highways in Tennessee. In the process, you're creating some future clean up work for yourself or other editors. If I could give you a quick wish list of things to change:

  • Please use the {{convert}} template to display the metric conversion for customary lengths. Additionally, has the ability to handle proper English grammar for adjective forms.
  • There should be a dash in "north–south" or "east–west". If you can't easily type one from your keyboard, there's a link to insert one below the editing window.
  • We should never use just a plain URL for a citation. This promotes link rot.
    • With a link to Google Maps, we have {{google maps}} that supplies all of the details and formatting if you add in |url=, |title=, and |access-date=. If for some reason you have multiple citations to Goole Maps, you can add |link=no to the second and subsequent footnotes so that "Google" and "Google Maps" aren't wikilinked.
    • For other maps, there is the generic {{cite map}}. In that template you should provide |author=, |date= (or |year=), |title=, |url=, |scale=, |location=, |publisher=, |access-date=.

If you can add these things at a minimum, like I did here, the result will be a lot friendlier to readers, and it will be less clean up work for someone else in the future. Imzadi 1979  17:36, 14 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

In your many article creations, you have written a variation on the same basic sentence that is grammatically incorrect. When using a length to describe a road, you are using that length as an adjective. In {{convert}}, you should use |adj= to output the length as an adjective. Instead of "a 9.8 miles (15.8 km) long north-south state highway" in Tennessee State Route 436, it should read either:
  • "a 9.8-mile (15.8 km) north–south state highway"; or
  • "a 9.8-mile-long (15.8 km) north–south state highway".
The first version uses |adj=on, and the second uses |adj=mid|-long. Whenever these new articles come across User:AlexNewArtBot/USRoadsSearchResult, I'll tag them with the talk page banner for WP:USRD, and for a while, I was cleaning up formatting and grammatical errors, but I grew tired of doing so. It would be helpful if in the future you could use this formatting tweak when using {{convert}} so that the output is grammatically correct. Imzadi 1979  22:01, 30 October 2019 (UTC)Reply
edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tennessee State Route 13, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cunningham, Tennessee (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:23, 3 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

Infobox road vs. infobox road small

edit

On "listicles" like Special routes of U.S. Route 31, the individual mini articles within the list use {{infobox road small}}. We would only use {{infobox road}} at the top of the overall page, or at the top of stand-alone highway articles. Imzadi 1979  21:45, 23 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 19 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mississippi Highway 584 has been accepted

edit
 
Mississippi Highway 584, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Imzadi 1979  23:56, 21 December 2019 (UTC)Reply
edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Newfoundland and Labrador Route 1, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Confederation Building (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 22 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Gander Bay, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Beaver Cove, Newfoundland and Labrador (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 15:17, 18 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

Non-free content use

edit

  Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. We always appreciate when users upload files. However, it appears that one or more of the files you have uploaded or added to a page, specifically List of highways numbered 3, may fail our non-free policy. Most often, this involves editors uploading or using a copyrighted file of a living person. For other possible reasons, please read up on our Non-free criteria. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Marchjuly (talk) 03:36, 29 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

Newfoundland and Labrador highway article issues

edit

The collection of articles are following some poor editing and writing choices. Good highway articles in general follow a different formula called the "Big Three". They are:

  1. A route description (RD) that lays out, in prose, where the roadway is routed from one end to the other. This is where we would describe, in prose, the communities which a roadway serves, with context. A bulleted list of communities lacks that context and does not help a reader unless he or she is going to read our articles with a map sitting next to the computer. Attractions along the length of the highway should be mentioned in this section, naturally and neutrally in the flow of the prose.

    This is honestly the easiest section of an article to write, and it's normally the first content written for an article.

  2. A history section that describes the major changes from the designation or construction of the road to the modern day.
  3. The "road junction list" (RJL) that lists the junction in tabular form.

    This is normally the first section actually created with its own header. (The nascent RD tends to stay merged with the lead until later.)

From time to time, good road articles get other standard sections that aren't in the Big Three, like a future section describing the confirmed plans to change the highway in the future. There are some less common and slightly non-standard sections that can be added where appropriate, like one dedicated to the history of the memorial highway designations or one dedicated to the historic bridges along the roadway. These other sections are all written in prose

For stub-sorting purposes, we base that classification off prose size; the bulleted lists do not count count as "readable prose" in the page size tool.

For article assessment purposes, the road projects use the Big Three for classification. No separate sections or just one, it's Stub-Class. (Stub-Class and stub sorting are separate functions; the former is just the lowest rung on a ladder and may or may not align with the latter, although alignment is common.) Once the article has two of the Big Three, it's Start-Class. After it has all three, it's C-Class. If the quality is there, citations are present, then it can be upgraded to B-Class. If any section is woefully deficient, for example a single-sentence history or an RD paragraph that's too short for the expectations of a road of a given length, it's disregarded for assessment purposes.

The see also section is also a bit problematic. Links to the "List of highways numbered X" entries are rarely helpful. Readers are not typically going to navigate from a Route 100 and want to read about others with the same number. Even repeating the link to the master list for the province wouldn't be useful since its prominently at the bottom of the infobox. So normally we'd only include portal links in the see also (the proper location) or skip the section totally.

So in short, the bulleted lists are just padding the visual length of the articles, and without context, they're not useful. The see also sections are also not serving their proper function, which is to direct readers to other directly related articles not already linked in the body of the article (including the lead and infobox). Turn those lists into proper RD sections, provide the missing context, and readers will benefit, but sometimes it's better to say less and say it well than to confuse and turn away readers. Imzadi 1979  21:32, 22 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

I have sent you a note about a page you started

edit

Hello, BDAN88

Thank you for creating Newfoundland and Labrador Route 80.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice work! Really needs a map.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|North8000}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 12:35, 18 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

I have sent you a note about a page you started

edit

Hello, BDAN88

Thank you for creating Newfoundland and Labrador Route 94.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice work. Really needs a map. Happy editing.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|North8000}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 11:53, 19 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Newfoundland and Labrador Route 450, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cooks Brook (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:02, 3 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:01, 24 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mississippi Highway 6, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bobo, Mississippi.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 17 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mississippi Highway 9, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page TVA.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:19, 31 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mississippi Highway 19, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Choctaw, Mississippi.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 31 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mississippi Highway 29, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jones College.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:12, 27 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Mississippi Highway 315
added a link pointing to Sardis Lake
Mississippi Highway 6
added a link pointing to Peach Creek

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:54, 25 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mississippi Highway 42, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Sand Hill, Mississippi and Bogue Homo.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 25 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Mississippi Highway 606

edit

I have not been able to find a source supporting that Highway 606 is along Lake Boulevard, and neither of the sources you cited support this either. Google Maps shows Highway 606 here. Could you please give me some details? Thanks. Magnolia677 (talk) 22:03, 6 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

That is nothing more than a narrow county road maintained by Alcon County. Not maintained by the state, nor designated by the state. Not sure why this comes up on a Google search (even when it is marked on Google Maps as County Road 606). Thanks for the quick check and info though. BDAN88 (talk) 22:09, 6 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

Even signed in the field as Alcott County Road 606 here [1] BDAN88 (talk) 22:23, 6 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

Do you have a source to support Mississippi Highway 606? Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 22:39, 6 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

[2]

Scroll halfway down to state highway lengths and it gives a description of the road (along with all other state highways in the state). BDAN88 (talk) 22:42, 6 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

You wrote: "Beach Boulevard, maintained by the city". Where is the source for this? Thanks. Magnolia677 (talk) 22:57, 6 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

Well it's not maintained by the state, nor part of MS 606, and its in the city limits of Bay St. Louis, doesn't leave a lot of agencies left. BDAN88 (talk) 23:00, 6 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

How do you know it's not maintained by the state? It's a state highway. Magnolia677 (talk) 23:09, 6 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

If you actually read the article you would find it says the state maintained portion of Beach Boulevard is MS 606. Beach Boulevard continues north past the eastern end of MS 606 and state maintenance (at US 90) into some neighborhoods along the southern and western coastline of the Bay of St. Louis. THIS IS THE SECTION THAT IS CITY MAINTAINED. BDAN88 (talk) 23:14, 6 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

Before I delete that entire section from the article, I will ask you again, what is your source to support that? Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 23:16, 6 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

I will do it myself. Don't wear yourself out. Please go bother somebody else. BDAN88 (talk) 23:18, 6 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

Mississippi Highway 338

edit

I haven't seen that done on any other highway articles. Yes, we've covered previous uses of the designation in the history, but we haven't put an infobox or a junction list in the history section like that.

Regarding an infobox in the history section, normally they're a previous designation for the same roadway as the modern highway: CR 553 on M-553, etc.

With the extra RJL, it has the side effect that you break up the topic, visually interrupting an article on the modern highway with an RJL about essentially a different article. (That's why business routes merged to their parent highways should be listed last so that the flow is about the parent first.)

At the very least, that part should be moved lower in the article, or honestly, spun out into a separate article called Mississippi Highway 338 (1960–1962) if that content could be expanded a bit more. Imzadi 1979  16:40, 15 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hurricane, Mississippi

edit

Why did you create Hurricane, Mississippi, and then redirect it to another community? Please look here, and at associated maps. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 13:07, 18 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

July 2021

edit

  Please do not add or change content, as you did at Esperanza, Mississippi, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 19:27, 18 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Esperanza, Mississippi, you may be blocked from editing. Please stop your disruptive editing. Magnolia677 (talk) 19:39, 18 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:56, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Straitsview = Spillars Cove

edit

Hello. I see it was you that made this edit. I am currently working on designated place articles in Newfoundland and Labrador. Is there somewhere on the web that confirms these are two competing names for the same place? It does happen elsewhere. I've seen StatCan use a different name for a hamlet in Alberta than the hamlet's official legal name. Cheers, Hwy43 (talk) 03:50, 31 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

"Hurricane, Mississippi" listed at Redirects for discussion

edit

  An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Hurricane, Mississippi and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 December 4#Hurricane, Mississippi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. MB 03:38, 4 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Manitoba Highway 3A, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cypress Creek.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 20 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Manitoba Highway 6, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Cedar Lake and Hudson Bay Railway.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 16 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

SK highways

edit

Hello. I noticed you added some SK 600 and 700 series highways to Wikipedia:Requested articles/Applied arts and sciences/Transport. I'll gladly get working on them. I'm wondering, though, do you know of any sources I can work from? Thanks! Masterhatch (talk) 11:58, 14 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Honestly, I just was flipping through those articles and noticed them in the junction lists and figured they were worth investigating further. BDAN88 (talk) 00:20, 15 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
Cool. When I get some time, I'll see if I can locate them on Google Maps and get something going. Masterhatch (talk) 00:40, 15 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
Thank you! 143.55.242.122 (talk) 00:41, 15 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
edit

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Carman, Manitoba
added a link pointing to Boyne River
Manitoba Highway 13
added a link pointing to Boyne River

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:22, 10 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

October 2023

edit

  Hello, BDAN88. I noticed that your recent edit to Manitoba Highway 50 added a link to an image on an external website or on your computer, or to a file name that does not exist on Wikipedia's server. For technical and policy reasons it is not possible to use images from external sources on Wikipedia. Most images you find on the internet are copyrighted and cannot be used on Wikipedia, or their use is subject to certain restrictions. If the image meets Wikipedia's image use policy, consider uploading it to Wikipedia yourself or request that someone else upload it. See the image tutorial to learn about wiki syntax used for images. Thank you. - Sumanuil. (talk to me) 01:34, 23 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:57, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

"Beach Boulevard (Hancock County, Mississippi" listed at Redirects for discussion

edit

  The redirect Beach Boulevard (Hancock County, Mississippi has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 January 20 § Beach Boulevard (Hancock County, Mississippi until a consensus is reached. Utopes (talk / cont) 01:47, 20 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Manitoba Provincial Road 200, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Roseau River.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 10 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Great work on Manitoba highways

edit
  The Original Barnstar
Thank you for all your hard work on improving the Manitoba highway articles! Masterhatch (talk) 18:25, 26 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
Thank you! BDAN88 (talk) 20:18, 16 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Manitoba Provincial Road 246, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CBC.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:55, 24 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

A beer for you!

edit
  Cheers for your article on Manitoba Provincial Road 260! Keep up the good work. OnlyNanotalk 23:49, 19 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
Thank you! BDAN88 (talk) 00:59, 20 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
edit

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Manitoba Provincial Road 366
added a link pointing to Duck Mountain Provincial Park
Manitoba Provincial Road 367
added a link pointing to Duck Mountain Provincial Park

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:52, 17 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:42, 19 November 2024 (UTC)Reply