User talk:Baa/Archival Quality/November 2009

This page is a chronological archive of past discussions from the current talk page for the period November 2009.

In order to preserve the record of past discussions, the contents of this page should be preserved in their current form. Please do NOT make new edits to this page. If you wish to make new comments or re-open an old discussion thread, please do so on the current talk page.

If necessary, copy the relevant discussion thread to the current talk page page and then add your comments there or preferably link to the section in question within the archives.

Re: User:ChristianGirl2

Sorry, I didn't get back to you on that. Anyways,  Looks like a duck to me and blocked. MuZemike 19:58, 3 November 2009 (UTC)

Good, thanks, I've undone my removal so you can respond there so you know it's been dealt with if you like to keep parity with conversations like I do. Also, as a tidbit, notice this diff in response to us not having IPs being blocked forever. This is most likely because she somehow managed to get an administrator to indef block another IP address in the past. treelo _radda 20:05, 3 November 2009 (UTC)

Original version of Ed, Eddy etc.

Created by User:UBracter. Black Kite 00:05, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

Dang, next to useless. That editor isn't of that sort so it won't be him who's socking. Thanks though. treelo _radda 00:24, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

Fosters Home for Imaginary Friends season 3 DVD

Why do you keep guessing when the DVD will come out? I want the source where you get the dates from. --Justvideo (talk) 02:30, 10 November 2009 (UTC)

I've been saying that exact same thing to someone else on the main Foster's article, funny that huh? Well, I haven't been guessing and never provided that date but someone else has done, check your history diffs more closely. Then again, given you decided to dump your message right at the top of my page, most likely so I can see it faster, I don't know if that's asking too much of you. I've taken it out anyway, that list has enough problems without guesswork being added to the fanfapping there. treelo _radda 09:51, 10 November 2009 (UTC)

} Oh. Ask them to leave it TBA until there is an official announcement. It's annoying! --Justvideo (talk) 03:36, 11 November 2009 (UTC)

"The best sort of nonsense"... (on the logo on Cartoon Network (United States) (post-header))

Nope thats the new logo check it out on cartoon network.com and tune in on cartoon network and you will see that logo being used —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rb pk (talk • contribs) 18:43, 12 November 2009 (UTC)

Yeah, we've done this before with other people also arguing "this is really the new logo, really!", stylistic changes don't constitute a signifigant enough change otherwise we'd have to switch them every season. There is precedent here and this weak reasoning of "it's in use right now" has also been rejected as the corporate logo remains unchanged even if the on-screen version changes. Don't add it back until some consensus is reached on the talkpage and not here OK? I'm not edit-warring again, may as well quit. treelo _radda 18:51, 12 November 2009 (UTC)

Listen its the facts get it right —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rb pk (talk • contribs) 18:53, 12 November 2009 (UTC)

No, it's not "the facts" as you put it and I did ask you to discuss it on the correct talkpage. Don't editwar and discuss it instead but if that's beyond you then I'll have to goto elsewhere to settle this. treelo _radda 18:58, 12 November 2009 (UTC)

Cartoon Network (United States) edit

You recently undid a revision I made to the Cartoon Network article adding a link to the United States page. I understand your intent behind this revision. My intent, however, was to include Canada somewhere in the original article's content. Your revision undid that. Can you think of another way of including Canada somewhere in the article's content? Thanks. KDS4444^Talk 08:35, 20 November 2009 (UTC)

There isn't a way of putting in Canada as they do not actually have a Cartoon Network variant, Teletoon pulls in much of what Cartoon Network proudces and/or airs due to regulations preventing programming creators who have broadcast networks to broadcast under their name in Canada. Might be neat to mention it but then you'd have to explain why a lot of other countries don't have Cartoon Network where they are too. treelo _radda 12:10, 20 November 2009 (UTC)

November 2009

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at User talk:Aozz101x. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Consider this a friendly warning. Your communications with Aozz101x are highly uncivil, especially in edit summaries. Moreover, the level-4 warning you left them is completely unwarranted: you may disagree with their edits, and they may or may not be misguided or even disruptive (though they'd have to be much more frequent), but there is no way that these edits a. constituted vandalism as defined in WP:VAN b. warranted a level-4 warning right off the bat. I suggest you cool down and if needs be engage the other editor in conversation. Finally, in regards to the edit summaries in which you say things like "floods of nonsense" and "don't be so stupid: reread WP:CIVILITY please. Drmies (talk) 20:53, 24 November 2009 (UTC)

Yeah, you are right and the 4im warning was wrong but couldn't you have told me without the template in tow? WP:DTTR is always a nice read. treelo _radda 21:13, 24 November 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of awards and nominations received by Foster's Home for Imaginary Friends/archive1

Hi, thanks a bunch for the help with the review, but what was the reason behind you striking your suppose? The Flash ^{talk} 01:28, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

A suppose, neither oppose or support huh? It wasn't right for me to support if I ended up fixing up issues I didn't see but agreed with, can't support that which you fix either as far as conflicts of interest go. treelo _radda 01:48, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

True; I figured that was the reasoning behind it. The Flash ^{talk} 01:57, 25 November 2009 (UTC)