User talk:Bearcat/Archive 22

Archive 15

←

Archive 20

Archive 21

Archive 22

Archive 23

Archive 24

Archive 25

X Factor (Denmark season 11)

It seems that the IPs at X Factor (Denmark season 11) just can't be told. I reverted the last recreation by the IP you reverted,[1] and it was recreated 13 minutes later.[2] --AussieLegend (✉) 05:53, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

Nightstream

Hi, I have redirected the page to CBC Radio 2. What about it's talk page? Should it be kept as is, deleted, or redirected? Thank you. RoCo^(talk) 08:20, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

Hi, I wanted to let you know I redirected the talk page to the same target. Thank you. RoCo^(talk) 16:46, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

MfD Opinion #2

Hi there! I was just wondering if I could get your opinion on Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Soorebia? If not that's fine.

Thanks for your time!

TheSandDoctor (talk) 23:04, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for your input on that. --TheSandDoctor (talk) 23:10, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

Second opinion request on Draft:Byzantine Silver

Hi there! Could you possibly take a look at Draft:Byzantine Silver for me and let me know what you think? I am thinking that it might be acceptable in its current form (some minor formatting fixes though) and was wondering what your thoughts on it are.

Thanks for your time!

TheSandDoctor (talk) 05:44, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

Input on review

Could I please get your input on this? Draft:Norman Cooling

User_talk:TheSandDoctor#Article_on_Gen_Norm_Cooling

Thanks!

TheSandDoctor (talk) 16:41, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

MfD opinion on Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Rishi Aurobindo Mission School

Could I please get your thoughts on Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Rishi Aurobindo Mission School? Thanks! --TheSandDoctor (talk) 23:59, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

Withdrew MfD nomination and nominated for G11 instead. --TheSandDoctor (talk) 00:50, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

MfD opinion on Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Syntactic noise

Hi again Bearcat, I was just wondering if I could get your opinion on Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Syntactic noise. As always, thank you for your time. --TheSandDoctor (talk) 00:39, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

Discussion closed. Primefac (talk) 01:03, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

List of television stations in Idaho

Sorry to knock on your door, but if you have a moment, it would be very helpful for an uninvolved admin to have a look at the recent history of the page above. I have an IP editor that keeps reverting without explanation. Mlaffs (talk) 23:35, 11 April 2017 (UTC)

Hello, Bearcat. You have new messages at Mlaffs's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/New 94.3 FM Kentville, Nova Scotia

You're definitely an expert on these apps coming in front of the CRTC, so your word is likely appreciated in this discussion. Nate • (chatter) 03:03, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

Compulsive remover of AfD tag

His talkpage is full of annoyed users because of his removal. User talk:Biwom
Is it allowed? Thanks :) —usernamekiran[talk] 18:55, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Alejandra Ribera, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Latin music. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:50, 15 April 2017 (UTC)

Recovery of Deleted Content

Hi User:Bearcat, I created the article Dominick Sokotoff and it was deleted about a month ago. I was hoping that I could get the deleted material for further improvement. Thanks! Penger888 (talk) 20:30, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

Democratoz Article

Hi Barecat! I don't really get how to reply on the messages I recieve. I recieved a message about deletion of my recent article Democratoz. Can I know why please? Thank you very much for your cooperation and advice

"Omar Tarawneh 22:53, 16 April 2017 (UTC)"

re

I see your point. Would it be possible to re-publish the page after modifying its content to be conform with Wikipedia standards? I mean it is not banned from being posted again, right?

As for the references, I have all the links to written and online press, especially for the US tour included in the article. The fact that I put Youtube videos is just because I thought that a tvinterview is a document that is taken into consideration when used as a reference.

Thank you for your help "Omar Tarawneh 23:03, 16 April 2017 (UTC)" — Preceding unsigned comment added by Omartara (talk • contribs)

Robert Carr (activist)

Per Wikipedia:Deletion process#Relisting discussions I think the time to close this discussion and remove the deletion banner at the top of the page has come.Channyloulou (talk) 22:22, 18 April 2017 (UTC)Channyloulou

Hello, Bearcat. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Carr (activist).
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

West Montrose, Ontario

Your good judgment on articles about Canadian settlements would be appreciated at West Montrose, Ontario. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 13:39, 21 April 2017 (UTC)

Comments on a talk page

Hello Bearcat. While merging in some information about a non-notable band, I came across this talk page: Talk:George Burdi. I know it's not a part of the encyclopedia, but some of the postings there seem more like gossip and general opinion rather than discussion of Mr. Burdi. Do you think that any of it should be removed?—Anne Delong (talk) 11:03, 22 April 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of DROG Records

The article DROG Records has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable label. Appears to be for local bands.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Walter Görlitz (talk) 00:51, 27 April 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Mia Sheard

The article Mia Sheard has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

non-notable musician. Fails both WP:GNG and WP:MUSICBIO

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Walter Görlitz (talk) 01:08, 27 April 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Chris Brown and Kate Fenner

The article Chris Brown and Kate Fenner has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

non-notable musician. Fails both WP:GNG and WP:MUSICBIO

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Walter Görlitz (talk) 01:08, 27 April 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Rosa Labordé, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Doc (TV series). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:53, 27 April 2017 (UTC)

Neutral notice

This is a neutral notice to all registered editors at RuPaul's Drag Race and Talk:RuPaul's Drag Race this year (2017) that an RfC on sourcing and citing has begun at Talk:RuPaul's Drag Race#Request for comment. --Tenebrae (talk) 14:16, 28 April 2017 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Pride 2017

You are invited to create and improve LGBT-related content at Wikipedia and other Wikimedia projects throughout the month of June as part of the fourth annual Wiki Loves Pride campaign. Feel free to add new and expanded content on the project's Results page. Happy editing! ---Another Believer _(Talk) 14:59, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

Coal Glen, North Carolina

We have a problem.

You redirected Coal Glen to the wrong article. Fortunately, when I was in the process of creating the article all over again because of tomorrow's big event, I noticed that it said the event was taking place at Farmville Church. Uh-oh. So there were not two towns called Coal Glen, North Carolina. There are, in fact, two Farmvilles.

I should probably move the article, since you argued that it should be called by the community's current name.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 18:02, 2 June 2017 (UTC)

AFD question

I nominated Barel for deletion. It was about a village in India whose existence could not be verified. There were several Delete votes, and then the content was changed to a different village in a different state in India that is known to exist. Now there are several Keep votes, and obviously an article on this village can/should exist. This is a bit unusual since the subject/content of the article completely changed during the course of the AFD. From an Admin perspective, should I withdraw at this point. Or is it more proper to rollback the changes (saving the current version as a draft), let the article get deleted, and then recreate from the draft. Does it matter? Any edit-history issues to consider? MB 23:03, 4 June 2017 (UTC)

OK, I've marked it as withdraw. What about the talk page? It will have a record of the AFD, and a couple of other entries pertaining to the "old" Kashmir article. Those really have nothing to do with the "new" UP article. I don't really feel strongly about removing the "old" stuff from the edit history, but "old" talk page stuff should go. Is it proper to delete this from the talk page, or should I just add a entry to clarify that earlier entries are not applicable to the current article. This is why I was thinking it would be cleaner to delete and start over. Would a temporary delete/restore that you mentioned take care of this? MB 14:18, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of The Business Network

The article The Business Network has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Can't locate sources to indicate this would pass WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 21:35, 2 June 2017 (UTC)

Ugh, sorry for templating you, but I appreciate you taking a look at the PROD and being cool about it. I don't know that I've ever seen a creator endorse a PROD, so that was neat :) ♠PMC♠ (talk) 03:29, 6 June 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Quebec Connection for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Quebec Connection is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quebec Connection until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. —Anne Delong (talk) 11:17, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

Can you please move the page to Emma Little Pengelly — Preceding unsigned comment added by Katie960 (talk • contribs) 17:19, 10 June 2017 (UTC)