User talk:Benlisquare/Archive 1

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

→

Archive 5

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Benlisquare/Archive 1! My name is Ryan, aka Acetic Acid. I noticed that you were new and haven't received any messages yet. I just wanted to see how you were doing. Wikipedia can be a little intimidating at first, since it uses different formatting than other sites that use HTML and CSS. In the long run, though, you'll find that the WikiSyntax is a lot easier and faster than those other ways. Here are a few links to get you started:

• How to edit a page
• Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
• Picture tutorial
• How to write a great article

There are a lot of policies and guides to read, but I highly recommend reading over those first. If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. Please be sure to sign your name on Talk Pages using four tildes (~~~~) to produce your name and the current date, along with a link to your user page. This way, others know when you left a message and how to find you. It's easier than having to type out your name, right? :)

I hope you enjoy contributing to Wikipedia. We can use all the help we can get! Have a nice day. Sincerely, Ryan. 05:34, August 2, 2005 (UTC)

AMD

Benlisquare, I saw your edit over on AMD (disambiguation), but your addition does not have any links to any other pages in Wikipedia. Disambiguation pages are meant to help people get to where they're trying to go. Are you going to write an article about AMD as a CS clan? - grubber 18:57, 9 November 2005 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Playgear Pocket.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Playgear Pocket.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{GFDL}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 23:23, 10 February 2006 (UTC)

RE: Need sources for "Anti-Japanese sentement" - Popular culture in China. help?

I don't have satellite TV, (and barely have cable for that matter). So I don't usually watch/read Chinese news. I'm far more interested in the ghosts of a bygone era and its forgotten stories of strife and heroism. /melodrama

I have a few poorly-made pseudo-socialist piece-of-crap anti-Japanese flash cartoons that my friends sent to me, if you want. Some pretty interesting photos of the last great anti-Japanese riot (that there are Japanese in China to begin with is an indication of the inconsistency of the application of their "principles"), and a few articles blasting these guys. There are some bao-diao (ie. protect diaoyu dao) groups from HK and ROC with their websites, but I don't think that's what you're looking for.

Nothing official of course. The CPC (Capitalist Party of China), in a dazzling display of saving face and spinelessness, is willing to sell out their people for a few coppers. Some bao-diao websites (that threaten vigilante action) are banned for example, and they lick Japanese boots (clogs, I suppose) hoping to get a morsel from the booming Japanese economy, which, coincidentally, is revitalized ENTIRELY by China.

You probably didn't ask me to rant. So I'll stop. Don't think I can help you there. Besides, I'm not sure what you would qualify as "anti-Japanese" websites. A site which documents Japanese war crimes? That seems to qualify under the criteria of certain people on Wikipedia. Or does it have to spew some pretty vitriolic anti-Japanese venom? -- 我♥中國 15:53, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

IP Address

User:Benlisquare uses this IP address, please do not block. It is shared IP address for the TPG Australia ISP. 220.245.209.35 (talk) 04:19, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:20052008467.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:20052008467.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 23:15, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Sinablk1.JPG)

Thanks for uploading Image:Sinablk1.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 09:43, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

Source

You need to provide a source for this. Timeshift (talk) 00:43, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

Mozilla Firefox unicode / font change

Hi,

The talk page isn't a forum, so I've removed the comment you recently added there. This change was implemented to make it easier to debug Unicode issues, along with being in line with the W3C recommendation for what to do when a glyph can't be displayed. In your case it looks like you need to switch fonts. Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 13:45, 14 July 2008 (UTC)

Your english wiki page——in chinese for ——P.L.A.

• should that be——中国人民解放军 ??

  Nargis 2008 (talk) 07:54, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

  泰王万岁   Hehehe !!

B.T.W. Welcome to Wuu wiki.

AfD nomination of Supersoldier

I have nominated Supersoldier, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Supersoldier. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? --EEMIV (talk) 14:02, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

China

I understand that you are patriotic and love China, but the correct way to go about that would be by criticising the autocratic regime that denies your countrymen basic human freedoms, not supporting it. 58.7.49.87 (talk) 13:10, 8 August 2008 (UTC)

I am bemused as to why you feel so protective of a totalitarian government that is systematically ruining life, liberty and freedom for the Chinese people while at the same sullying China's name around the globe. 58.7.49.87 (talk) 13:17, 8 August 2008 (UTC)

I'm well aware that it doesn't justify vandalism. I'm just curious about your personal political beliefs, since I had no idea that Western Chinese would buy into the propaganda of the Party. 58.7.49.87 (talk) 13:22, 8 August 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of South Korean cultural claims

An article that you have been involved in editing, South Korean cultural claims, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/South Korean cultural claims. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Caspian blue (talk) 02:19, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

I removed the link related to me. I state my ethnicity on my user page already, and everybody can figure out my identity by looking at my contribution history as well. So please do not restore my information on the AFD. Regards.--Caspian blue (talk) 05:13, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

Your WP:CANVASSING to Chinese and Japanese Wikipedia

If you're truly doing from good faith to enhance the article, You should have been open to public, and equally notified it to Korean Wikipedia. I'm very disappointed at your inappropriate behaviors surrounding the AFD. --Caspian blue (talk) 14:38, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of South Korean cultural claims

I have nominated South Korean cultural claims, an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/South Korean cultural claims (2nd nomination). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 22:15, 18 September 2008 (UTC)

Anti-Korean sentiment

I stated my reasons for removing this unsourced information in the article, so you should better have good reasons for reverting this edit. Accusing me of biased censorship is not a good reason, and AGF, I hope that this was a mistake on your part. Please read the edit summaries before reverting. Novidmarana (talk) 02:24, 20 September 2008 (UTC)

ANI

Hello, Benlisquare. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Novidmarana (talk) 22:07, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

Warning

Edit summaries such as [1] are not acceptable, if you feel the need to compare me with Hitler do it in private but not here. Especially as you were the one who claimed that there was only one Tibetan protestor, not me. Novidmarana (talk) 02:04, 30 September 2008 (UTC)

Fu Yan Jie

A tag has been placed on Fu Yan Jie, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of Fu Yan Jie and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. ←Signed:→Mr. E. Sánchez ^{Get to know me!} / _{Talk to me!}←at≈:→ 04:00, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Ms vista chinese black1.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Ms vista chinese black1.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:25, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Non-genuine-desktop.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Non-genuine-desktop.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:17, 24 October 2008 (UTC)

Chinese exclamative particles

I noticed you just created this article and I just wanted to let you know, if you can add some good, reliable sources (this one might have some useful stuff: Lin, Huey Hannah (2005). Contextualizing Linguistic Politeness in Chinese [2]. The Ohio State University. {{cite book}}: External link in |title= (help)) and expand the article to over 1500 characters (not counting the lists and tables) in 5 days or less, you could nominate it for Did you know to be featured on the main page. I just created and nominated Bǎ construction a couple hours ago, and it would be awesome to get multiple Chinese grammar articles on there. —Politizer ^talk/_contribs 04:28, 1 December 2008 (UTC)

File:Gradient left red1.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Gradient left red1.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 08:36, 23 December 2008 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:Maki horikita.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Maki horikita.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. DAJF (talk) 04:03, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

Hello, Benlisquare. You have new messages at Arichnad's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Possibly unfree File:Horikita Maki.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, File:Horikita Maki.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Peripitus (Talk) 05:37, 27 January 2009 (UTC) --Peripitus (Talk) 05:37, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

File:Fuyanjie foreigner.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Fuyanjie foreigner.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Peripitus (Talk) 05:40, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

Capricorn

Thanks for your active contribution to Wikipedia. I would like to apologise for causing quite a war to heat up between the both of us over the use of Simplified or Traditional Chinese in this English Wikipedia, but I am not "disrupting to illustrate a point". I would like to point out to you that there are many Wikipedias in different languages for different users around the world, including English, Simplified Chinese and your Traditional Chinese. I think that we should standardise on the Chinese used in the English Wikipedia and the Chinese that is more commonly used around the world is the Simplified Chinese, which, as the name suggests, is simplified and easier to use and understand for the people using this English Wikipedia than Traditional Chinese. Once again, I stress that I am not disrupting to illustrate a point but making Chinese understood more easily by the people using this Wikipedia. If you do not mind, you can start, or continue on it if it is already there, the article Capricorn (album) on the Traditional Chinese Wikipedia. Thank you for your kind understanding. inyrface (talk) 15:13, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

牛

Hi, 牛 is being used a lot in Chinese internet, 牛逼, 太牛了, or 太牛逼了, such internet expressions had been used everyday. Arilang ^talk 01:49, 19 February 2009 (UTC)

Chinese internet terms

Saw your message at Arilang's talk page about Chinese internet terms. If you ever get interested in making a new article on that topic, here is a good source that might help (from a talk I saw at a conference last year):

• Gao Liwei (2008). "Language change in progress: evidence from computer-mediated communication" (PDF). Proceedings of the North American Conference on Chinese Linguistics. 20: 361–377.

The References section of that article also looks like it will be a good way to dive into the literature. rʨanaɢ ^talk/_contribs 17:01, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

你好

The answer to your question is that I am simply privileged to have access to both JSTOR (online journals) and a quality library since I attend George Mason University (well, for one more semester). Cheers.--Pericles of Athens^Talk 17:37, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

我也是. I think being in university is the only way most of us get any of our sources...almost all my stuff is either from my library or from databases like PubMed and PsycInfo, which I wouldn't have access to if I weren't a student. rʨanaɢ ^talk/_contribs 17:49, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

Versions of map

You replaced this map (File:Tenka Han (zh).png) with a new version of the map created by PhiLiP (File:Tianxia zh-hanj.svg, File:Tianxia zh-hant.svg, File:Tianxia zh-hans.svg). However, the user PhiLiP created three versions of this map in svg; one in Japanese, one in traditional Chinese, and one in simplified Chinese. Since according to the map's source desciption, the original map was a Japanese map, in which all three maps were based upon, I figured the Japanese version would be the best version. I would argue that there is no apparent reason why we can't use the Japanese version, as it is created by the user who also created the other two Chinese versions, and I thought it is the closest to its source material.

I would also suggest you to write appropriate comments in your edit summary and discuss such matter with the other editor if you have problem over the edits.--Balthazarduju (talk) 08:43, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

Your argument is invalid. If I were to write an article on the Battle of Britain, would I have a map of events written in Russian? If I were to have a depiction of Mayan glyphs, would I place it on the EN Wikipedia in Swedish? Regardless of whether the Chicken or the Egg came first, these terms are Chinese terms. It would be illogical to place Japanese maps on the English Wikipedia regarding a Chinese concept. Chinese and Japanese are not the same. Those words on that image do not mean the same thing in both Chinese and Japanese. For example, the Hanzi Character for "Chicken" in Japanese means "Penis" in Chinese, "Machine" in Chinese as "Table" in Japanese. Assuming that it is alright to use Japanese in this sense is utter ignorance. This is an Association fallacy of the worst kind. You have edited without justification, reason or negational evidence, and is therefore a Argument from ignorance, and I condemn such acts. Regards, -- 李博杰  | —Talk contribs 09:34, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

Additionally, the usage of Simplified Chinese characters are more widespread than Traditional Chinese characters. Traditional is used only in Taiwan, Hong Kong and Macau, while Simplified is official in the People's Republic of China, Singapore and Malaysia, while also being the official Chinese script as recognised by the United Nations. Number wise, about 20 million people use Traditional, while 1300 million people use simplified. Also note that the sans-serif-font of the Simplified Chinese version of the image looks more visually appearing than the brush woodblock print font found in the Traditional Chinese version of the image. From a small size (i.e. thumbnail), the brush font is ugly and difficult to read, while the sans-serif font is more distinct. Unless they manage in creating a sans-serif-version of the Traditional Chinese image, I see no need in the usage of Traditional Chinese; such a font coupled with a complex stroke system is a poor choice, given the size of the thumbnails. The detail of the Traditional characters can barely be made out from such a font at such a small text. The shadowing used behind the text also makes it difficult to read behind the dark thin lines of the brush font, especially the blue font, as compared to the thicker sans-serif font. -- 李博杰  | —Talk contribs 07:12, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

Hi! It seems that in Wikipedia, the traditional Chinese characters are more widely used in articles dealing with ancient Chinese history and in historical maps (as oppose to articles and maps dealing with contemporary China). I actually have no strong opinion against it or for it (unlike many users on Wikipedia who "hates" simplified Chinese characters, judging from their template boxes). If you want to express your view on this issue concerning Chinese characters used in China-related articles in Wikipedia, you should probably put your view about this issue on Wikipedia:WikiProject China.--Balthazarduju (talk) 02:21, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

Re PoA: The official script in Singapore is Simplified. And yes, Overseas Chinese communities use Traditional, but exactly how many million would that make up? -- 李博杰  | —Talk contribs 04:07, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

Re Balthazarduju: I don't mind whether its Simplified or Traditional; I just think that a sans-serif font is better than a thin-brush stroke font, especially in tiny thumbnail images. -- 李博杰  | —Talk contribs 04:09, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

How do you change the name of an article

Ya, see title.Teeninvestor (talk) 01:50, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

new article

Please help to build up an article I have just create2009 Auction of Old Summer Palace bronze heads

dates

Hi, I noticed that you linked a date or two at Beijing Television Cultural Center. This practice is now deprecated. Please see WP:LINKING and WP:MOSNUM. I'm happy to respond to any inquiries you may have about the matter. Tony (talk) 12:19, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

Tony mis-states things: WP:LINKING and WP:MOSNUM are both currently in dispute, and under arbitration. If you have any questions on this, feel free to ask me on my talk page. —Locke Cole • t • c 11:35, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

Recreation of File:Fuyanjie foreigner.jpg

Hi Benlisquare, as this file was deleted after a deletion discussion you cannot just recreate it but must contest it either with the deleting administrator (Stifle) or at deletion review. I've deleted this again as a recreation of material previously deleted after a discusson (see WP:CSD#G4). - Peripitus (Talk) 02:00, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

The only real change was the addition of a rationale "To depict the meme on its respective article. Used fairly. Image is of low resolution and quality." - this does not address the points raised in the deletion discussion. What you need is an argument that it meets all of the ten non-free content criteria. THe issue is that it can be replaced with a free image of the product and that the advertisements can be (and are) described in text...so the image fails the first criteria - Peripitus (Talk) 02:17, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

I like your photos

Please help to upload another copy of Fire damaged TVCC building.jpg, as this image is facing deletion because I cannot provide the permission of use by the creator. Since you are a more experienced user than me, may be you can upload it using different license ? Arilang ^talk 06:33, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

Thanks very much for the kind suggestion, I have successfully re-upload the image onto EN Wiki. I did not know we can do that; in this case, we can actually upload many useful and relevant images onto articles we created, as long as this fair use policy is observed? Arilang ^talk 08:15, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Zhang Ya

An article that you have been involved in editing, Zhang Ya, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zhang Ya. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Chick Bowen 16:05, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

Li

我觉得你的作品 file:Evolution Li signature.png，非常没有道理，只是你自己的写法吧，有书法家的帖参考么？User:Keyi 18:50, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

Inner Asia during the Tang dynasty

Take a look, add some citations. This "tenmei" guy seems determined to delete what he can.Teeninvestor (talk) 16:17, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

This article has been heavily disrupted by a tag team, seeking to delete/merge it. My attempts to improve you have resulted in an edit war. Please check.Teeninvestor (talk) 20:05, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

LConway93

I blocked the user before you ever posted on his talk page. :-) faithless (^speak) 06:07, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

カカカ！！！

俺はガンダム！　-- 李博杰  | —Talk contribs 09:40, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

Bloke message

I got it from another user, who confused me.Teeninvestor (talk) 13:33, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

Yet another good article

Please check it out:http://yaleglobal.yale.edu/display.article?id=12154 article by professor Wang Gungwu. I think this article is too shallow, please let me know what you think Arilang ^talk 14:03, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

Hi again

Haven't talked in a while, but I noticed that you have commented on the Han Dynasty page in the past. Have you taken a look at it anytime in, oh, let's say the past 3 days? ;)--Pericles of Athens^Talk 19:31, 27 March 2009 (UTC)

Chinese reunification

"Grumpy-wumpy"ness aside, you've most certainly misread my edit comment. Here's how my descriptions match up with the sources.

• CHNQiang = extremist, nationalist website
• VenChina = Chinese-Venezuelan website
• Blog.ifeng = blog
• bbs.cctv and bbs1.people = two blog posts.

So as you can see, the PhoenixTV blog does not correspond to the "extremist, nationalist" label that I used. I would also like to point out that info coming from a blog on the PhoenixTV website, where anyone can register for a blog of their own, isn't quite the same thing as info coming from PhoenixTV.

But since you seem to like the PhoenixTV blog entry, I have gone and looked up the source, which is here:

http://www.taiwanthinktank.org/ttt/attachment/article_976_attach4.pdf

There's no other way to look at this: the blog entry is WRONG.

• This is not a KMT thinktank but a pro-Green thinktank.
• The 2012 date is not a KMT plan; it is a worst-case scenario, fear-mongering projection.

I would also like to point out that one of the forum posts (the one on People's Daily) repeats the same erroneous claim as the PhoenixTV blog, and that the Venezuelan link is broken.

So now, the tally for the sources in that paragraph stands at:

one extremist nationalistic website + one venezuelan-chinese news site (link broken) + one blog entry that is patently wrong + one forum post that repeats the exact same erroneous claims + another forum post.

I will remove the paragraph again, as I did before, unless you object.

-- ran (talk) 05:50, 30 March 2009 (UTC)

List of countries by pornography industry revenue per capita

On the page List of countries by pornography industry revenue per capita you have a link to http://internet-filter-review.toptenreviews.com/internet-pornography-statistics.html as the source. This is obviously not a reliable source in and of itself and I don't see any evidence that they got their information from a reliable source themselves, so do you have any objection to me deleting the page and redirecting it to a page such as pornography ?

Replaceable fair use Image:Horikita Maki 04 small.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Horikita Maki 04 small.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

Since she is a living person a free photo of her could be made. —teb728 t c 20:37, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

Tianchao Daguo

Tianchao Daguo is here, need your help to add contents to sections Tang/Song/Yuan/Ming/Qing. Arilang ^talk 17:49, 3 April 2009 (UTC)

User:Arilang1234/Sandbox/Roving ambassador for China

Please feel free to add content. Arilang ^talk 14:26, 3 April 2009 (UTC)

Article on Tibet

民族自治，当初给自己挖这么个大陷阱 this is one of the best article on Tibet that I have read. Arilang ^talk 19:37, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

Please add content

You may like this article:User:Arilang1234/Sandbox/List of offences that attract jail terms in China Arilang ^talk 16:41, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

Have a look:Xinfang Arilang ^talk 11:53, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

-ing in Chinese slang

Hey Benlisquare. I know you're interested in working on articles about slang and informal Chinese, so here are some links (one is an actual article, one just an abstract) you might find useful:

• "Mandarin borrow-ing English grammatical forms". Pinyin.info. 4 January 2008. Retrieved 4 April 2009.
• "From English morpheme to symbol of Chinese "netizenship": Exploring 'ing' in Chinese blogs" (PDF). Retrieved 4 April 2009.

rʨanaɢ ^talk/_contribs 15:05, 3 April 2009 (UTC)

ITN for Kwangmyŏngsŏng-2

On 5 April, 2009, In the news was updated with a news item that involved the article Kwangmyŏngsŏng-2, which you substantially updated. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the In the news candidates page.

--BorgQueen (talk) 06:20, 5 April 2009 (UTC)

Awesome. -- 李博杰  | —Talk contribs email guestbook complaints 06:21, 5 April 2009 (UTC)

Naming Laws in the People's Republic of China

Nice article! I added the WikiProject China banner to the talk page.--Pericles of Athens^Talk 02:38, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

Nice. I also read a few months ago that more and more couples are starting to combine their last names (similar to hyphenation on Western names...for example, if 张三 and 李四 get married, they might use 张李 as their child's family name) because the 100 or so common names are getting saturated. Unfortunately, I don't remember the exact citation, but if I can find it I'll let you know; it might be worth mentioning in the article.

Also, I had never heard of the 赵C case before, that's pretty interesting. Reminds me of 阿Q ;) rʨanaɢ ^talk/_contribs 02:46, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

I nominated the article for DYK, you can see it here. rʨanaɢ ^talk/_contribs 07:27, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

Oops, never mind that; I didn't notice that you had already nominated it. rʨanaɢ ^talk/_contribs 14:02, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

Classical Chinese grammar looks like it's off to a good start! Once again, excellent work. You're really becoming an asset to Wiki.--Pericles of Athens^Talk 14:07, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

Second Sino-Japanese war

Hello, I think some advice is needed on the subject of the communists' involvement in the war : Talk:Second_Sino-Japanese_War#Chinese_communist_party_in_list_of_fighters. If you are interested and have a moment, it could be useful to benefit from as many viewpoints as possible. Jean-Jacques Georges (talk) 12:15, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

Shenfenzheng

Great work with Junmin Shenfenzheng. Unfortunately, there are still a few minor issues that need to be cleared up before it's ready for DYK; I have noted the issues here. I would definitely like to see this hit the main page, so hopefully we can get the issues cleared up quickly. rʨanaɢ ^talk/_contribs 16:08, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

Dude, you're on fire! Keep going! Sure, it needs additional citations, but it already looks excellent for a start article. Great work.--Pericles of Athens^Talk 16:44, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

Gonna echo PoA's comments...by pointing out the problems I don't mean to be saying it's a bad article. It actually has a ton of good information and is very well-organized, and will probably be a strong GA candidate once sources are added and cleaned up. rʨanaɢ ^talk/_contribs 16:46, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

In regards to the inline citations and English names for external links, I'll get to that as soon as possible. -- 李博杰  | —Talk contribs email guestbook complaints 05:20, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

Added inline citations and English names to links.　-- 李博杰  | —Talk contribs email guestbook complaints 06:40, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hi, and welcome to the Military history WikiProject! As you may have guessed, we're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to military history.

A few features that you might find helpful:

• Our navigation box points to most of the useful pages within the project.
• The announcement and open task box is updated very frequently. You can watchlist it if you are interested, or you can add it directly to your user page by copying the following: {{WPMILHIST Announcements}}.
• Important discussions take place on the project's main discussion page; it is highly recommended that you watchlist it.
• The project has several departments, which handle article quality assessment, detailed article and content review, writing contests, and article logistics.
• We have a number of task forces that focus on specific topics, nations, periods, and conflicts.
• We've developed a style guide that covers article structure and content, template use, categorization, and many other issues of interest.
• If you're looking for something to work on, there are many articles that need attention, as well as a number of review alerts and copy-editing alerts.
• The project has a stress hotline available for your use.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask any of the project coordinators or any other experienced member of the project, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome, and we are looking forward to seeing you around! Abraham, B.S. (talk) 07:57, 11 April 2009 (UTC)

Classical Chinese

Thanks for your understanding.

First of all, the textbooks of the schools in PRC are not the original sources of the articles. During most of the Classical Chinese period, from Han dynasty to ROC, the articles written by Classical Chinese used the Traditional Chinese characters.

Secondly, the Simplified Chinese characters have combined some Traditional Chinese characters with different meanings together, which violated the original meaning of the Classical Chinese articles.

At last, I think that I should not use the term "must", but as an encyclopedic article, we should try to make it as accurate as possible. Maybe we can list the Traditional Chinese and Simplified Chinese characters simultaneously?--Itsmine (talk) 11:07, 11 April 2009 (UTC)

I agree with Benlisquare here, I don't think this is entirely accurate. There may be rules about use of traditional characters in Taiwan (I wouldn't know) but certainly not on the mainland. I myself learned classical Chinese in simplified characters. In any case, the most important thing is to maintain consistency within and across articles, and as far as I know most of the major articles on Chinese language here are using simplified characters. rʨanaɢ ^talk/_contribs 13:13, 11 April 2009 (UTC)

OK, but Classical Chinese Wikipedia uses Traditional Characters. I think we should cater more to that than to Vernacular Chinese Wikipedia. Also, users of Vernacular Chinese Wikipedia can switch everything to Traditional or Simplified. Asoer (talk) 05:40, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

What?? Classical Chinese is a dead language. 文言-wiki doesn't really dictate what we should do here, and the fact that it uses traditional characters doesn't mean there's some kind of rule (for all we know, it just happens to be that way because it was started by editors from Hong Kong, for example). There's a Latin Wikipedia, too, that doesn't mean we have to pay attention to it. rʨanaɢ ^talk/_contribs 10:52, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

DYK for Jumin Shenfenzheng

On April 13, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Jumin Shenfenzheng, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Shubinator (talk) 15:56, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

Awesome, thanks. -- 李博杰  | —Talk contribs email guestbook complaints 23:44, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

Mongoloid cuticle? That's awesome!

Seriously, man. Pardon my language, but where do you find this shit? That's one of the most obscure thing's I've ever read. I'll admit, though, it's pretty cool. Good work (as usual)! Cheers.--Pericles of Athens^Talk 04:44, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

Dude...no way! Hahaha! That's pretty damn funny. I didn't expect that. Your research seems pretty solid with citations, even though at first my impression was "oh, come on! That's just a hangnail...wait a minute...hmm..." Lol. Have you heard? I put Han Dynasty up for featured article status! It looks nice and shiny now.--Pericles of Athens^Talk 04:51, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

Hmm. Don't know. Semi-retirement? I've done so much already. I think at this point I'll just make smaller contributions. I will never again tackle something as big as an entire dynasty, that is for sure. But maybe some random but important biographies on people in Chinese history.--Pericles of Athens^Talk 04:58, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

That's a good question; it's one I don't know the answer to. It appears fine on this monitor that I'm using.--Pericles of Athens^Talk 16:47, 15 April 2009 (UTC)

AfD for Mongoloid cuticle

Twinkle didn't work. I've nominated this for deletion, see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mongoloid cuticle Dougweller (talk) 07:58, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

The best thing to do is just to add stuff to the article as you find it. When you do find something, then mention it at the AfD - there's still a lot of time. I am still puzzled as to why, if this is as distinctive as it seems, it doesn't have the same medical coverage as Mongolian spot or epicanthic fold. My only interest is that any article meets our policies and guidelines - and I have no reason to think you don't share the same interest. Dougweller (talk) 13:47, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

DYK for Naming laws in the People's Republic of China

On April 17, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Naming laws in the People's Republic of China, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Dravecky (talk) 00:46, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

Thanks. -- 李博杰  | —Talk contribs email guestbook complaints 02:23, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

Naming laws in the People's Republic of China

Thanks for creating the article Naming laws in the People's Republic of China and submitting it to DYK. I found it to be a well-crafted and enjoyable short read, and the few examples of odd names mentioned were highly interesting. Keep up the good work and happy editing.--Boston (talk) 02:20, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

Thanks, I really needed that encouragement. Enjoy the rest of your day. :D -- 李博杰  | —Talk contribs email guestbook complaints 02:13, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

• I opined "keep and don't rename" at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mongoloid cuticle, so now you have even more to lift your spirits. Peace. --Boston (talk) 02:20, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

Hello

All of those sources are from the article Koreans in Mongolia. If you would like more information, please read the article. Have a good day. Russian Luxembourger (talk) 13:35, 18 April 2009 (UTC)

Copying some photos to Wiki Commons

Hello,

You have posted quite a few valuable photographs to the English Wiki, but I feel that they would be more "visible" if they had been posted to Wiki Commons as well (or instead). Namely, the photos from User:Benlisquare/Gallery#2008_Chinese_Winter_Storms could fir very well in commons:Category:2008 Chinese winter storms, where there are only a few photos from the last year's snowstorm season so far. This way, the images could be used not just in the English wiki but in all other projects as well. Of course, when posting to Commons, we have to pay attention to their license rules, which may be somewhat different from the English wiki. Thanks! Vmenkov (talk) 01:48, 19 April 2009 (UTC)

Unfortunately, it's impossible to embed an image posted to en.wiki into an article in any other wiki - the image has to be on Commons. Besides, another advantage of having the image on Commons is that it's easier to find, due to Commons' well-developed category structure, and links to the appropriate Commons category (via the "commonscat" tag) from various languages wikis (as I've just done in zh:2008年中国雪灾). As to the licenses, if you've taken the picture itself, and it does not depict anything that's "copyrightable" on its own (e.g., not a photo of a modern painting), you can just pick a GFDL or CC license from the license selection box during uploading. If it's done by someone else - e.g., a family member who agrees to you uploading the image under such a license - I guess you can just pick the same license, indicate the author's name in the appropriate field, and mention somewhere (in "Permissions", I guess) that he's your family member and has authorized you to release his photo under such-and-such license. I've done it once with a photo sent by my brother. Now, in some cases - such as, uploading a picture that has appeared somewhere on the web already - other Wiki Commons editors may request confirmation that the author of the photo has really released it under a GDFL/CC license; in that case you'll need to have the author to send a special email to OTRS (they have a multilingual procedure for it). But I think usually such verification is not asked for. Vmenkov (talk) 04:03, 19 April 2009 (UTC)

I understand. OTRS is a pain to use - I wish they had an easy web UI, without the participants having to actually compose and send long messages. Thanks anyway for your response. Vmenkov (talk) 09:03, 19 April 2009 (UTC)

DYK for Nine exterminations

On April 20, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Nine exterminations, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Shubinator (talk) 05:10, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

Again, thanks. -- 李博杰  | —Talk contribs email guestbook complaints 05:27, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

sorry

Very big argument regarding AKS

but your revert is nonsense. you must fix its grammar. but you must not whole revert. Cherry Blossom OK (talk) 10:25, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

and your edited version is serious Chinese side POV. Anti-CNN is not a proper source. Cherry Blossom OK (talk) 10:26, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

Please prove that any trusted media source, "Korean violated to Chinese". I Point out that it is a Chinhese Internet made "Fake". like 孙中山 was Korean?[3] Cherry Blossom OK (talk) 10:29, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

Can you read Korean language? [4](in Korean)

시민행동 김규호 목사는 "우리가 돌과 금속절단기를 손에 들고 있는 장면은 중국 시위대의 폭력행위가 모두 종료된 뒤 기자들에게 날아온 물건들에 대해 설명하고 있는 것이다"고 말했다.

김 목사는 "문제의 동영상은 매우 악의적인 왜곡이어서 방치할 경우 사실을 잘 알지 못하는 중국인이나 외국인들이 오해할 것으로 여겨진다. 또 제 개인에 대해서도 심각한 명예훼손 행위다"라고 말했다.

Cherry Blossom OK (talk) 10:30, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

Are you assuming that I cannot? And are you assuming that your POV is not unbalanced, while mine is? I have no way to comprehend what you are intending to state, or how you claim that my edits are incorrect. -- 李博杰  | —Talk contribs email guestbook complaints 10:53, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

---

(my corrected edit) But, The Chinese sites' claim, based on the image, is 'fake'.

The Korean article explains the photos like this ;

After the incident, Korean citizens were explaining to news reporters how violent the chinese rioters were to them, showing the tools used by the Chinese. They said "Chinese were using these tools. They hold up the bicycle and tried to strike us, like this."(They were mimicking the Chinese rioters' action in front of the news reporters) However, Chinese internet users fabricated a story with the images and claim that Koreans attacked Chinese students with the tools.

(my corrected edit) Following the 2008 Sichuan Earthquake, Some Koreans posted Anti-China comments on the Internet, which was originally caused by Chinese students' riot during the Olympic torch relay in the capital of S.Korea. Although almost every Koreans posted condolence to the Chinese victims[39], Chinese internet users ignored the fact, and spread nothing but some Koreans' Anti-Chinese comments. They've neglected the same kinds of responses from Japanese users.Japanese netizens also posted Anti-China comments throughout forums on the Internet,[40][41][42][43] Chinese Internet doesn't pick Anti-China comments from Japanese. and only pick bad comments from S.Korea.

(Eg.)[5]

名前：名無しさん＠八周年 [2008/05/13(火) 20:25:38 ID:+jkojSKI0] どうせなら、チベット虐殺の元凶どもがいるところで大地震が発生 すればよかったのにな Die. all chinese.

名前：名無しさん＠八周年 mailto:sage [2008/05/13(火) 20:27:00 ID:oL5GmVKB0] 南京大虐殺みたいに被害者捏造してんじゃね？

they fabricated victims, too? like nanking massacre?

名前：名無しさん＠八周年 [2008/05/13(火) 20:29:48 ID:LcY+93LP0] 支那蛆虫のクソガキが折り重なって野垂れ死んだのは爽快でした。 日本国民は、全員、爆笑しました。

We Japanese are really feel refreshing when 支那蛆虫 died.

名無しさん＠八周年 [2008/05/13(火) 20:25:38 ID:+jkojSKI0] どうせなら、チベット虐殺の元凶どもがいるところで大地震が発生すればよかったのにな EarthQuake, Please Kill more and more... tibetan murders!(Chinese).

名前：名無しさん＠八周年 [2008/05/13(火) 20:26:38 ID:O/k4UPja0] 漢民族が死ぬのはまったく困らんが、55の少数民族に被害が出たとしたら、 心からお悔やみを申し上げる

I really happy when many Han Chinese dead. it is not tragedy.

but i do not want minor race dead.

名前：名無しさん＠八周年 [2008/05/13(火) 20:26:52 ID:LcY+93LP0]

反日野郎の死を心から喜び、お祝い申し上げますｗｗｗｗｗｗｗ白眼をむきながら地獄へ堕ちろｗｗｗｗｗ

I really happy when Anti-Japanese goons are dead. (laugh)

名前：名無しさん＠八周年 [2008/05/13(火) 20:26:54 ID:UIcqllBV0]

漢民族だけ、もっと死ね！

もう一回や二回でかいやつ、北京と上海で起れｗｗ

Please, Earthquake, kill only Han Chinese!

名前：名無しさん＠八周年 [2008/05/13(火) 20:27:15 ID:UjtZNZh80]

どうか2次災害で沢山の中国人が死にますように

More Chinese die! i feel happy. Cherry Blossom OK (talk) 11:34, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

Hey! this is not your blog. this wikipedia. you want collect every single anti-china stuffs?

Wikipedia:Content forking

"A content fork is usually an unintentional creation of several separate articles all treating the same subject. A point of view (POV) fork is a content fork deliberately created to avoid neutral point of view guidelines, often to avoid or highlight negative or positive viewpoints or facts. Both content forks and POV forks are undesirable on Wikipedia, as they avoid consensus building and therefore violate one of our most important policies."

Cherry Blossom OK (talk) 11:44, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

WP:OR

Re [6]: Quoting examples from unreliable sources and drawing conclusions from them is precisely the definition of Original research. I deleted the section about the Sichuan Earthquake because it claimed to draw conclusions about Chinese and Japanese internet users at large based on a few forum posts. In fact what should be done in this case is to rely on the examples which have been presented in reliable sources and the conclusions which those reliable sources have drawn from the examples, not coming up with one's own summary of a bunch of unrelated forum posts. cab (talk) 11:48, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

Well it doesn't explain Cherryblossom deleting my refs from Seoul Broadcasting System and Hani. -- 李博杰  | —Talk contribs email guestbook complaints 11:50, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

very original research. content pov forking. unreliable source(and rjkoehler is blog) you will not stop it? then i will report your behavior to admin. Wikipedia is not your blog. your personal feeling write your personal blog. and your edit is little bit fabricated. Cherry Blossom OK (talk) 11:52, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

your sources are generally unrelaible. almost blog sources.Cherry Blossom OK (talk) 11:55, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

Horseshit. -- 李博杰  | —Talk contribs email guestbook complaints 11:55, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

it is not your blog. but rjkor and anti-cnn and others are not relaible source. content forking is not acceptable. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cherry Blossom OK (talk • contribs) 11:57, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

Why the fuck are you ignoring my arguments? I have stated, for the fourth time, SBS, Hani, and The Korea Times are NEWS SOURCES. NEWS FUCKING SOURCES. Also you have deleted a few REFERENCES which I have added from DETAILED PAPERS. LOOK at your EDITS. -- 李博杰  | —Talk contribs email guestbook complaints 11:59, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

Why the "fuck" WP:CIVIL i can report your vandalism.

Treatment of Chinese students in South Korea

original source is Blog. and its unreliable.

hani.com says, quote from Chinese internet, but, hani.com does not prove its fact.

rjkor and anti-cnn is not acceptable media source.

Cherry Blossom OK (talk) 12:00, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

According to hani.com source, 한국 유학생활을 담은 한 누리꾼의 글이 중국 인터넷에서 몇 년째 유통되고 있다. 출처가 불분명한데다 다소 과장된 면도 있어보이지만, 한국에 관심있는 이들은 누구나 한번쯤 봤을 법한 글이다. unclear chinese source spread to Chinese internet,

Hani.com says, it is a unclear blog article. so, hani.com does not prove it is a FACT.Cherry Blossom OK (talk) 12:01, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

Referring to my language above, I am HORRENDOUSLY STRESSED by your inability to see my arguments, as a result of your ignorance. Sure, I shouldn't swear, but your actions REALLY MAKE ME ANGRY. Do you HONESTLY BELIEVE that I can keep my cool? If I am really that bad, then I do apologize, however that you must understand that I AM HUMAN and I do get angry when things like this occur, when people actively IGNORE your arguments. Trust me, when you are pissed off and angry, YOU WILL SWEAR TOO. Otherwise you are not human. -- 李博杰  | —Talk contribs email guestbook complaints 12:02, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

Again, regarding Hani, it reports that it EXISTED. The paragraph DOESN'T SAY that it IS THIS, it is that Chinese people SAY that this.... This is supported by Hani. Do you have issues in interpreting information? -- 李博杰  | —Talk contribs email guestbook complaints 12:05, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

you 100% can sure that original author is a real Chinese? who know? it is written by Japanese or not. Cherry Blossom OK (talk) 12:08, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

You don't have to believe what is said by the "Chinese" (or whatever) in the Hani article. You just have to realize that it is one viewpoint, recorded by a RELIABLE SOURCE, Hani. Look at what I have written in the article. It says "Chinese students say that ........", it does NOT say that "Korean people are discriminating", it says "Chinese people say that Korean people are seen to be discriminating. Whether it is Japanese or whatever is entirely irrelavent. What is relavent is that a RELIABLE SOURCE has STATED that a Chinese person has SAID SOMETHING IN HIS VIEWPOINT, who CLAIMS that Korean people are SEEN to be discriminating. -- 李博杰  | —Talk contribs email guestbook complaints 12:10, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

Don't pushing your POV. please show any reliable source please. BBC, CNN, CCTV!!! rjk is not a relaible source. it made by some guy. and its site is NOT a public media.Cherry Blossom OK (talk) 12:10, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

You can made anything anti-china stuffs by blog and personal homepage... Cherry Blossom OK (talk) 12:12, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

WHAT?!??!?!? BBC, CNN, CCTV ARE NOT RELIABLE?!?!?!??!?! GOD PLEASE HELP ME!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! What on earth are you ON ABOUT? -- 李博杰  | —Talk contribs email guestbook complaints 12:13, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

Are you blind?

I says, you must prove sources like BBC, CNN, CCTV (relaibe source)

1st of all, Korea is not your enemy. Korea is friend of China.

2nd, You better avoid content POV forking. I can made China as Super dirty country by Full of Japanese blog.(SARS, AIDS,Bird-Flu,Blue-eared Pigs, Poisonous Dumplings, Toys, chocolates & Toothpastes, Selling criminals' organs, Killing innocent Tibetian monks,Picpockets, Fake products & Disneyland, No human rights, No freedom of speech and assembly, a bunch of chinese industrial spies & illegal immigrants, environmental pollutions and distructions...) You know Hate Chinese blogs are many.. if i did it, you may revert my edit.

your sources are all unclear. all blogs-like sources. all unrelaible sources.

Cherry Blossom OK (talk) 12:15, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

Firstly, I never said that Korea was my enemy. I am editing in regards to Korean nationalism in which you are constantly removing. Let me get this straight, I don't hate Korea itself, only some people in Korea who hate China etc etc. Ever heard of BoA? I listen to that OK? Got that straight? Also know that this is entirely irrelavant? Second, I am not blind. Now we are equal. I said "fuck", you called me blind. Happy? Third, you are the one with the POV. Have you even read what I have been typing for the last half hour, or are you ignoring it? -- 李博杰  | —Talk contribs email guestbook complaints 12:20, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

Please stop using the same words over and over again... since when was SBS a blog? Since when was the Korea Times a blog? Please stop torturing me with your actions... if I told you that I hate Japan more than Korean nationalists, would you stop mesmorizing me, even just for one night? -- 李博杰  | —Talk contribs email guestbook complaints 12:21, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

I just remove unrelaible source. Basically, Korean welcome Chinese. I can't believe that unclear blog. 1. Blog-like source 2. hani.com is not original source. hani.com quote from Chinese blog. but, its chinese blog is also unclear with unclear author. i heavily doubt that really chinese treated like that. Cherry Blossom OK (talk) 12:23, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

[7] if you check my edit carefully, i just remove rjk and blog-like source. Cherry Blossom OK (talk) 12:25, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

OK that is fine for now. I will not revert. -- 李博杰  | —Talk contribs email guestbook complaints 12:26, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

And Your anti-cnn source, it is NOT true, and it is very idiot-like. Cherry Blossom OK (talk) 12:27, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

According to cctv source, there is no anti-korea sentiment exist in China.[8] it is tiny incident. Cherry Blossom OK (talk) 12:36, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

The link you have provided gives a 404. -- 李博杰  | —Talk contribs email guestbook complaints 12:38, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

here is another [9]

Unlike Internet, anti-Korea sentiment in China does not exist. it is tiny incidents.Cherry Blossom OK (talk) 12:38, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

So now you aren't worried about using blogs and forums? That was a men's site, look at those porn links at the side, no way near a reliable source. Anyways, we are not here to argue whether it exists or not. We are here to write an article from the evidence that we have, from sources such as news reports and essays by professional scholars. If you think you have something to contribute, add it to the article, given that it is reliable and not based on only one POV, but from both sides. -- 李博杰  | —Talk contribs email guestbook complaints 12:41, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

Ok. wait. I find relaible site.Here[10] Cherry Blossom OK (talk) 12:43, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

" Anyways, we are not here to argue whether it exists or not. We are here to write an article from the evidence that we have, from sources such as news reports and professional scholars."

100% right. so, i remove your blog-like source. and this source also prove my edit.[[11]] Cherry Blossom OK (talk) 12:45, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

I don't think essay is relaible source. i already said, I can make TONS of dirty image(SARS, AIDS,Bird-Flu,Blue-eared Pigs, Poisonous Dumplings, Toys, chocolates & Toothpastes, Selling criminals' organs, Killing innocent Tibetian monks,Picpockets, Fake products & Disneyland, No human rights, No freedom of speech and assembly, a bunch of chinese industrial spies & illegal immigrants, environmental pollutions and distructions, prostitutes, ...) of China by essay and blog-like sources. if you think like that, then You must not disturb me. OK? Cherry Blossom OK (talk) 12:47, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

It depends who writes it. If it is some 13-year old Japanese nationalist, it is not an essay, but a blog. If it is by a professional, someone who is certified in that area, and officially publishes the essay, that is a credible essay. There is a big difference between an essay and a blog. For example, if Hu Jintao writes an essay about economic policy, that is credible. If User:IsorokuYamamoto writes a blog about how gay Chinese fags are, it is not. -- 李博杰  | —Talk contribs email guestbook complaints 12:51, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

if i am a 50 years person, i write hate china article, in my blog, then it is acceptable? So Many Japanese blogs claim that tibet must seperated from China. then it is OK claim?

rjk it blog. it is not a credible essay.

"20 million prostitutes. In Shenzhen, just as in all other Chinese cities, the prostitution phenomenon is expanding as fast as the Chinese economy. At the lowest level, the prostitution market is frequented by hordes of young, single immigrants from the countryside who have invaded the cities in search of work, while at the higher levels it’s frequented by the new middle and rich classes with lots of money to spend and the high-levels of the Party hierarchy, who have always had a taste for this particularly type of luxury. Yang Fan, a Chinese economist, has calculated that there are at least 20 million prostitutes in the country, generating a income equal to 6% of the Chinese GDP. Apart from the show put on by the police in Shenzhen, it seems that the prostitution phenomenon is largely tolerated by the Chinese authorities. The girls themselves almost all come from poor rural areas where unemployment is very high, working on the streets, in bars, in the massages parlours, saunas and in all categories of hotel, both private and state-run. " [12]

this source is much credible than your blog-like sources. Cherry Blossom OK (talk) 12:56, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

Age makes no difference. Referring to what I have said above, a professional, someone who graduated from University with a "I can write essays and get paid for it" degree. And it must be published, as in, in a credible journal (e.g. "global warming" essays in Science Journals, "Somali pirates" essays in Newspapers). Sure, sure, there are prostitutes in China, I cannot deny that, but is this relavant? Plus, I wonder if the source was actually officially published. And it seems that you are eating your own words. QUOTE: "this source is much credible than your blog-like sources." What happened to QUOTE: "Korea is not your enemy. Korea is friend of China."? You claim to be friendly and non-agressive, but your later words seem otherwise. See Two-face. -- 李博杰  | —Talk contribs email guestbook complaints 12:57, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

Oh, and your comment seems to be an attack against me. Is it? I wouldn't be surprised if there were 30 million prostitutes in China, which would be 0.023% of 1.3 Billion. The proportions match that of Australia. Do you have a problem with there being prostitutes in China? And does this add any weight to your argument? -- 李博杰  | —Talk contribs email guestbook complaints 13:49, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

can you have any e-mail. i continue by e-mail. i don't want disrupt your page. Cherry Blossom OK (talk) 13:04, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

OK. Here is the another. Chinese goverment meida "people daily". It is much credible than your blog-like sources. [13] Cherry Blossom OK (talk) 12:58, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

Basically, Blog-Like sources are content forking. and it is not have any responsiblilty. please show any sources from BBC, CNN, CCTV, Peolpe daily.Cherry Blossom OK (talk) 13:00, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

Refer to the little envelope button at the top right hand corner of the screen. Although I would prefer it that you do not email me regarding this. I don't mind a messy talk page. It will be archived this November, let's see how bit it gets. Right now it is 52,936 bytes. -- 李博杰  | —Talk contribs email guestbook complaints 13:07, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

3RR warning

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Anti-Korean sentiment. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. In fact, you reverted more than 3 times, so stop reverting any more from now and please discuss.Regards.Caspian blue 12:27, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

Ping!

You have mail. rʨanaɢ ^talk/_contribs 12:45, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for the tip. I'll listen to some Jay Chou to calm down. (Works everytime!) -- 李博杰  | —Talk contribs email guestbook complaints 12:48, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

oh, you two members doing some metta puppeting campaign? Cherry Blossom OK (talk) 12:52, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

WP:AGF. He just told me to calm down. No need to get jittery. Just look at his contribs; does he look like the trolling type? AGF, please. There is no conspiracy. -- 李博杰  | —Talk contribs email guestbook complaints 12:52, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

Request for Mediation

A request for mediation has been filed with the Mediation Committee that lists you as a party. The Mediation Committee requires that all parties listed in a mediation must be notified of the mediation. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Li Yong (Tang Dynasty), and indicate whether you agree or disagree to mediation. If you are unfamiliar with mediation on Wikipedia, please refer to Wikipedia:Mediation. Please note there is a seven-day time limit on all parties responding to the request with their agreement or disagreement to mediation. Thanks, Nlu (talk) 16:54, 20 April 2009 (UTC) --Nlu (talk) 16:54, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

It's Featured!

Praise Jesus! Praise Buddha! Praise Tom Cruise, God of Scientology! Han Dynasty has just become a bonified Featured Article!--Pericles of Athens^Talk 19:12, 21 April 2009 (UTC)

Awesome! Great work, Pericles! -- 李博杰  | —Talk contribs email guestbook complaints 00:30, 22 April 2009 (UTC)

Ha! Thanks. Yes, Pericles would be happy that I'm using his good name for good purposes. Regards.--Pericles of Athens^Talk 00:39, 22 April 2009 (UTC)

Request for mediation not accepted

A Request for Mediation to which you were are a party was not accepted and has been delisted. You can find more information on the case subpage, Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Li Yong (Tang Dynasty). For the Mediation Committee, Ryan Postlethwaite 20:41, 23 April 2009 (UTC)

This message delivered by MediationBot, an automated bot account operated by the Mediation Committee to perform case management.
If you have questions about this bot, please contact the Mediation Committee directly.

Hello

I just joined the WikiCHina project and am currently working on some articles. I've tidied up the China section of the Three-legged bird artcile and added in alot of info and references, but I feel that the 3 creatures described in the article should probably have their own articles and would like to request for a split. Would you know how I could do this? Thanks whipsandchains (talk) 01:57, 25 April 2009 (UTC)

DYK for Zhonghua Zihai

On April 25, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Zhonghua Zihai, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Shubinator (talk) 17:59, 25 April 2009 (UTC)

Thanks. Sorry for the late reply, I was in Sydney for three days, in a hotel without Wifi or any form of Internet connection. Pfft, lame hotel. -- 李博杰  | —Talk contribs email guestbook complaints 06:58, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

Question

What type of license should the picture be then? File:Tiananmendifference.jpg 宁雨翔 (talk) 18:46, 25 April 2009 (UTC)

Another new article

Please have a look and help to add content:Nucai Arilang ^talk 04:22, 28 April 2009 (UTC)

Internet video that will change your mind on Chinese

• In Chinese:大陆禁片《我虽死去 1》 是中国人都要看的电影
• In Chinese:大陆禁片《我虽死去 2》 是中国人都要看的电影
• In Chinese:大陆禁片《我虽死去 3》 是中国人都要看的电影
• In Chinese:大陆禁片《我虽死去 4》 是中国人都要看的电影 4
• In Chinese:大陆禁片《我虽死去 5》 是中国人都要看的电影

• In Chinese: 大陆禁片《我虽死去 6》 是中国人都要看的电影
• In Chinese:大陆禁片《我虽死去 7》 是中国人都要看的电影

]

• In Chinese:大陆禁片《我虽死去 8》 是中国人都要看的电影
• In Chinese:大陆禁片《我虽死去 9》 是中国人都要看的电影
• In Chinese:大陆禁片《我虽死去 10》 是中国人都要看的电影
• Arilang ^talk 08:52, 30 April 2009 (UTC)

WHAT THE FUCK

What the FUCK, I DID NOT give ANY PERMISSION for my photos to be copied from EN Wiki onto Commons, and then have the EN Wiki version deleted. NO PERMISSION AT ALL. I hope those responsible are able to explain this shit for themselves. I, the author, STRICTLY DISALLOW the usage of my photos on Commons, it gives me the SHITS when people are ignorant enough to ignore my requests. Refer to my EN Wiki talk page. This is a clear violation of my rights and my will to personal decision. Plus, I wasn't even fucking informed, or inquired in any fucking way. Very fucking angry, -- 李博杰  | —Talk contribs email guestbook complaints 02:25, 5 May 2009 (UTC)

You should probably leave a message with commons:User talk:Tm, the user who did the move. It's not normal to move other people's images like this without asking. If you leave him a message he may be able to undo the move and deletion, or find an admin who can. rʨanaɢ ^talk/_contribs 02:31, 5 May 2009 (UTC)

I'm just pissed. I've already contacted the user. I hate the guts of Commons. I have clearly stated my intentions in at least n+1 places on EN Wiki. I am boycotting Commons because the JP Wiki is run by 支那-bashing, POVed fags, and I completely disallow them to use my images. -- 李博杰  | —Talk contribs email guestbook complaints 02:34, 5 May 2009 (UTC)

• Please AGF. The transfering needs a lot of time, and your screen name is clearly shown on moved pages. You're releasing your images under GDFL that means anyone can copy and use yours for any case. By moving them to Commons, your images can be more beneficially used. By the way, 밴댈 이곳에서 환영받을 수없습니다. -> 반달 사절 or 반달은 이곳 출입을 사절합니다. would be less awkward.--Caspian blue 02:43, 5 May 2009 (UTC)

支那-bashing?? What has Commons become? World War II era Japan? Lol. Seriously though, what bad experiences have you had with Commons? I upload nearly all of my images to Commons these days without much fuss (except for the occasional licensing dispute which usually gets resolved). In fact, look what I did for all the Chinese dynasty pages at Commons.--Pericles of Athens^Talk 03:12, 5 May 2009 (UTC)

I've had my share of arguments with stubborn POVed editors on the JP Wiki. They use 2ch to swarm, and only accept their own interpretations of how the world rotates. I'd rather them not have access to my images. Sure, its pointless of me, but I've decided to have a personal boycott of JP Wiki and Commons. -- 李博杰  | —Talk contribs email guestbook complaints 12:17, 5 May 2009 (UTC)

Navbox

Just so you know, the new code on your user pages is covering up (for my screen, at least) all the tabs in the upper left (history, edit, new section, etc.). You might want ty experiment with it on some other computers to try to get it so it doesn't cover up the top, because it makes it difficult for people like me to access any of the links. rʨanaɢ ^talk/_contribs 03:03, 5 May 2009 (UTC)

I've noticed that. On my home PC, it all works perfectly, while on a public terminal, it does not. I'll go over the coding and see what's going on. -- 李博杰  | —Talk contribs email guestbook complaints 03:04, 5 May 2009 (UTC)

There, done. I've fixed most of the bothersome HTML. How does it look now on your PCs? -- 李博杰  | —Talk contribs email guestbook complaints 23:39, 5 May 2009 (UTC)

Looks ok here. It's still causing problems on your userpage, but maybe that just hasn't been purged or something. rʨanaɢ ^talk/_contribs 23:43, 5 May 2009 (UTC)