Welcome

edit

Hello, welcome to Wikipedia, Boris!!

Sorry that i don't know how to create the Z letter in your name, i hope you don't mind me calling you by your given name. I've seen some of your edits, they look fine, thanks. So you seem to know what you are doing and won't need most of the info below. I'm adding it anyway because i always do. I hope you like this place and have fun editing.
We always like to meet new Wikipedians!
Here ar some more things to do, in case you're bored. But don't feel pressed by that.


You can help improve the articles listed below! This list updates frequently, so check back here for more tasks to try. (See Wikipedia:Maintenance or the Task Center for further information.)

Help counter systemic bias by creating new articles on important women.

Help improve popular pages, especially those of low quality.


You might find these links helpful in creating new pages or helping with the above tasks: How to edit a page, How to write a great article, Naming conventions, Manual of Style. You should read our policies at some point too.

If you want get to know more people here, list yourself at Wikipedia:New user log, and go back there sometimes to see if you find people matching your intersts. Go to Wikipedia:Community Portal to learn more about wikipedia and ways to participate.

If you have any questions, see the help pages, or add a question to the village pump. You also can leave me a message at User talk:Lady Tenar, but it may take a few days bevore i see the message and can respond.

Here are some more tips:

  • If you made any edits before you got an account, you might be interested in assigning those to your username.
  • You can sign your name using three tildes, like this: ~~~. If you use four, you can add a datestamp too.
  • If you ever think a page or image should be deleted, please list it at the votes for deletion page. There is also a votes for undeletion page if you want to retrieve something that you think should not have been deleted.

Again, welcome! Lady Tenar 20:54, 31 Aug 2004 (UTC)

This image, which you uploaded, has been tagged as a possible copyright violation. See Wikipedia:Copyright_problems#July_8. RedWolf July 8, 2005 07:25 (UTC)

Is the image of Seleucus I Nicator correct?

edit

You uploaded Image:Seleukos nikator.jpg. And it is being used in the article Seleucus I Nicator with the caption "bust of Seleucus I Nicator" The image file says that the image is from http://www.livius.org/l but following that link gives a different picture labeled as "Seleucus I Nicator". Also, this image looks like a picture of the same bust which is labeled here as "Bust of Attalus I, circa 200 BCE from [1] ". Can help resolve this problem? Thanks. Paul August 06:50, July 15, 2005 (UTC)

Image:Seleukos nikator.jpg

edit
Image deletion warning Image:Seleukos nikator.jpg has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. If you feel that this image should not be deleted, please go there to voice your opinion.

Thuresson 22:20, 4 August 2005 (UTC)Reply

Slovak?

edit

Da li je Živ slovačko prezime? Luka Jačov 23:45, 23 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

Ma ne prezivam se Živ nego Živković. Ovo je samo skraćeno. Nije slovačko, tata mi je iz Dalmacije. User:Boris Živ

Zašto mi nisi odgovorio na moj talk:)? Pa zašto nisi onda Boris Živkovič ili Bore Živ (ako čemo skračeno;)) Iz kojeg djela Dalmacije? Pretpostavljam Zadarsko ili Šibensko zaleđe. Pozdrav! Luka Jačov 22:20, 24 December 2005 (UTC) Zašto mi još nisi odgovorio:)?Luka Jačov 20:11, 29 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

Dobivam dojam da izbjegavaš odgovorit mi :-(. Luka Jačov 19:12, 30 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

Pa kratica je kratica! zar ne? Ma ne izbjegavam te, ali sam zatrpan... Prepravljam neke članke o hrvatskim kraljevima... Boris Živ 19:26, 30 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

No svejedno mi još nisi odgovorio. Luka Jačov 19:35, 8 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

Zašto mi još nisi odgovorio?? Luka Jačov 22:24, 9 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

Samo mi reci zašto izbjegavaš mi odgovoriti? Luka Jačov 20:04, 10 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

Ako je u planinama onda je Bukovica. Valjda su svi otišli poslje Oluje. Čude mi kako onda da si reko HolyRomanEmperoru da si Hrvat kad je Bukovica 90% pravoslavna a i Živkoviči ne mogu biti ništa drugo nego Pravoslavci. Luka Jačov 13:24, 11 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

Hi there,

Good work on kings of Croatia! Just one thing you got wrong... Verb "to resign" means to give up, to relinquish, and verb "to reign" means to rule. I fixed your error, I'm just informing you so you know for future application. --Dijxtra 10:47, 24 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

Croatian articles

edit

Hi! I added some categories to your recent articles about Croatian nobility figures. I hope that this category tree will help you place your articles into the proper categories. Each link there is a general category. Then readers can find your articles easier. Thanks. Gilliamjf 18:53, 30 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

Trpimir

edit

I see you copy/pasted content of Trpimir article to Trpimir I of Croatia. Now, that's wrong. If you want to change the name of the article, please use the "move" button on top of the article. --Dijxtra 19:01, 30 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

Ok! my mistake! Sorry! --Boris Živ 19:26, 30 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

Question

edit

Why not add Serbian language to your babel to include all ex Serbo-Croat (or Serbo-Croatian itself?) --HolyRomanEmperor 20:41, 8 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

cool --HolyRomanEmperor 14:29, 9 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

Prijezda

edit

I don't really understand the necessity of that move. There were two Prijezdas (the 1st and the 2nd); but isn't it obvious that the Prijezda without the suphix was actually Prijezda Ist? Should we move it back? --HolyRomanEmperor 14:32, 9 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

Hej! pozdrav! Da ti odgovorim na pitanja! prvo, i dalje slobodno uređuj moju User Page. Meni ne smeta. Pa ne bavim se ovim iz nekog interesa, baš je zabavno. Kad mi dosadi, uzeti ću odmor... Samo ostavi u tabli da govorim hrvatski (hrvat sam) i nešto malo engleski, ali napredujem. Što se tiče Prijezde I. Pa znaš da se imena vladara počinju brojkama, I,II,III,IV,V... ako sa vremenom (ime,pojam i sl.) Prijezda bude još nešto označavao, može postati i Disambiguation page. I za kraj, pa odakle ti da Prijezda I i Prijezda II nisu članovi House of Kotromanić? Jesu.99% (ništa nije 100%). Pročitaj hrvatsku stranicu o dinastiji ili encikopediju Lekikografskog zavoda (hrvatska enc.). Dinastija je dobila ime po Kotromanu ali je Prijezda I prvi poznati član te dinastije!

Za kraj, mislim da je u stranica o državi Bosnia and Herzegovina u komi. To jest, onaj dio o povijesti. Pa to treba u nekoliko rečenica reći a detalji idu u stranci za povijest...ovo je predugačko. Što se tiče stranice History of Bosnia and Herzegovina...Idi na Talk:History of Bosnia and Herzegovina ak ti nije problem za raspravu o dijeljenju stranice (37. Separate articles). pozdrav! Boris Živ

imas moj odgovor na mojoj stranici Talk:HolyRomanEmperor --HolyRomanEmperor 16:05, 10 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

User_talk:HolyRomanEmperor

Odgovor

edit

Upotrebio sam istu logiku kao sa Trpimirovic dynasty i Nemanjić. Vojvoda Trpimir i Velikie Župan Stefan Nemanja nisu prvi iz svoje kuće ali jesu osnivači dinastija.

Uopće nemam pojma o čemu pričaš. Ja ti nijesam dirao User page! Bog i čujmo se! --HolyRomanEmperor 23:20, 14 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

Image Tagging Image:Pericles1.jpg

edit
 
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Pericles1.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{GFDL}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Longhair 11:41, 3 February 2006 (UTC)Reply

False Friends of the Slavist

edit

Please have a look at wikibooks:False Friends of the Slavist. With your language skills, you can help us very much there, though there is not too much to be done. See also wikibooks:Talk:False Friends of the Slavist for details on what is still needed. Thanks in advance! --Daniel Bunčić 18:45, 1 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

Re: title

edit

A - pa ovako: titula mu je bila Ban Bosne - od 1377 je Kralj Srba i Bosne i Pomorja i Zapadnih strana. Od 1390 je Kralj Raske, Bosne, Dalmacije, Hrvatske i Pomorja. Kraca verzija titule mu je bila Kralj Srba i Bosne - tj. mnogo poznatije Kralj Bosne i Srbije. Dakle, slijedeci kraljevi bosne ce svi nositi razlicite titule: Stijepan Tomas: Kralj Srba, Bosne, Primorja, Humske zemlje, Donjih Kraja, Usore, Soli, Podrinja i Zapadnih strana, Stijepan Tvrtko II: Kralj Srba, Bosne, Primorja i Humske zemlje... itd... No - svima ostaje "Kralj Bosne i Srbije" karakteristicno od Tvrtka skroz do pada Bosne. --HolyRomanEmperor 19:08, 6 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

Isto kao i Stjepan Dabisa: Kralj Srba, Bosne, Pomorja, Humske zemlje, Zapadnih strana, Donjih Kraja, Usore, Soli i Podrinja ili Stjepan Ostoja: Kralj Srba, Bosne, Pomorja, Humske zemlje, Donjih Kraja, Zapadnih strana, Usore, Soli i Podrinja.

Tvrtko je ostao kao nominalan vladar srpskih zemalja - i ujedinio ih je pod Knezom Lazarom. Dalje je i izvojevao (Pirovu) pobjedu na Kosovskome boju. Kako kazu Stjepan Tvrtko I i Stjepan Ostojic - njih dvojica su naslijedili zemlju od praroditelja srpskih. No - najkraca forma je "Kralj Bosne i Srbije".

I naravno da treba uvrstiti Stjepana Tvrtka I kao hrvatskoga vladara na List of rulers of Croatia. Bog! --HolyRomanEmperor 19:24, 6 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Drebbel cover.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Thank you. Shyam (T/C) 00:14, 11 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

Hey, I was wondering if you were part Asian? (I'm only curious, u do not have to answer) Thanks!

Tomislav

edit

That article was a pure horror. I did as much as I could. I think it's much more decent now. What do you think? (Tomislav) --HolyRomanEmperor 14:20, 26 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

Name of the Homeland war

edit

You might want to join the discussion here: [2]. I'm sorry for disturbance if you are not interested the discussion. --Dijxtra 12:37, 29 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

Timur statue in Samarkand/Tashkent

edit

The photo on the Samarkand page features a photo of a statue of Timur. The photo, however, is of a statue in Tashkent. On the discussion page of the Samarkand entry I've provided a link to a photo of the statue of Timur that actually sits in Samarkand. I don't really know how to fix this problem, so I thought I'd let you know. Thanx!


Image:Lysimachus selcuk.jpg listed for deletion

edit
An image or media file that you uploaded, Image:Lysimachus selcuk.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Bibi Saint-Pol (sprechen) 09:06, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

Image:Demetrius poliorcetes.jpg

edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Demetrius poliorcetes.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Chowbok 02:00, 19 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Juraj Julije Klović

edit

Hello. Go to the talk page of Juraj Julije Klović and help out with the discussion. A fanatical Italian user keeps on inserting his POV/nationalism into the article, and has now requested the page be moved to "Giorgio Giulio Clovio" - which is false as the man was a Croat and was born in Croatia. There is a vote on the rename happening on the talk page. Please help, as he is canvassing for votes from other Italian users. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 124.187.23.190 (talk) 04:41, 1 January 2007 (UTC).Reply

Boris

edit

Are you alive (God forbid otherwise!)?

I need some more sources on Medieval Croatian history to write on the Subics and Frangepans... --PaxEquilibrium 22:15, 23 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Debate on the correct adjective for Kosovo

edit

Hi! Based on your interest in the Balkans, you may be interested in the currently ongoing debate on whether we should be using Kosovo or Kosovar/Kosovan as the adjective for Kosovo. —Nightstallion 15:26, 31 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Replaceable fair use Image:Timur.jpg

edit
 
Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Timur.jpg. I noticed the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if not used in an article), per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Calliopejen1 02:46, 16 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Replaceable fair use Image:Diadem.jpg

edit
 
Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Diadem.jpg. I noticed the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if not used in an article), per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Calliopejen1 12:35, 17 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Image:Diadem.jpg listed for deletion

edit

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Diadem.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 14:57, 25 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Possibly unfree Image:Agathocles_coin.jpg

edit

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Agathocles_coin.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Jordan 1972 (talk) 00:31, 18 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

edit
 

Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:Ptolemy i bm.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). As a copyright violation, File:Ptolemy i bm.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:Ptolemy i bm.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

  • If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at [[Talk:File:Ptolemy i bm.jpg]] and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
  • If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at [[Talk:File:Ptolemy i bm.jpg]] with a link to where we can find that note.
  • If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on [[Talk:File:Ptolemy i bm.jpg]].

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you.
Not all images on Livius are free images. Jappalang (talk) 10:43, 19 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Ade Capone

edit

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Ade Capone. The community has decided that all new biographies of living persons must contain a reliable source that supports at least one statement made about the person in the article as per our verifiability policy. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:10, 27 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Ade Capone

edit
 

The article Ade Capone has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Rettetast (talk) 08:45, 30 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Marcello Toninelli

edit
 

The article Marcello Toninelli has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Floul1Talk To me 11:32, 3 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Infobox picture

edit

Discuss about infobox picture of article "Croats" here.--Wustefuchs (talk) 11:46, 15 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Ade Capone

edit
 

The article Ade Capone has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. The-Pope (talk) 15:57, 9 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Captain Miki for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Captain Miki is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Captain Miki until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 01:29, 19 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Našice, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Barrack (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:21, 1 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Franz Haller, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Croatian National Theatre. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:51, 21 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Franz Haller

edit
 

The article Franz Haller has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Comatmebro ~Come at me~ 20:25, 18 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open!

edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:51, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Europe 10,000 Challenge invite

edit

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Europe/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Germany, Italy, the Benelux countries, Iberian Peninsula, Romania, Slovenia etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. If you would like to see masses of articles being improved for Europe and your specialist country like Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon, sign up today and once the challenge starts a contest can be organized. This is a way we can target every country of Europe, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant and also sign under any country sub challenge on the page that you might contribute to! Thank you. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 02:38, 6 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Himilco (disambiguation)

edit
 

The article Himilco (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Page not needed as only two entries.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PatGallacher (talk) 11:13, 16 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

edit

Hello, Boris Živ. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply