User talk:Buidhe/Archive 32

Archive 25

←

Archive 30

Archive 31

Archive 32

DYK for Georg Kareski

On 24 July 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Georg Kareski, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Zionist activist Georg Kareski defended the Nuremberg Laws in a Nazi newspaper? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Georg Kareski. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Georg Kareski), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

^Complex/_Rational 00:04, 24 July 2024 (UTC)

DYK for Software maintenance

On 28 July 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Software maintenance, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that some estimate that maintenance of existing software costs up to nine times as much as creating it in the first place? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Software maintenance. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Software maintenance), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

♠PMC♠ (talk) 00:02, 28 July 2024 (UTC)

CS1 error on Nicolas Guillou

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Nicolas Guillou, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A bare URL and missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 14:21, 28 July 2024 (UTC)

Seattle Wiknic 11 August 2024

2024 Seattle Wiknic | 11 August 2024
What: Picnic to eat food and chat with other Wikimedians When: Sunday 11 August 2024, noon–3 pm Where: picnic tables in the meadow area at Washington Park Arboretum Please come and bring food! We'd love to see you.
You're receiving this message because you are on our mailing list. To opt out of future mailings, please remove your name from the list.

(t · c) buidhe 04:37, 1 August 2024 (UTC)

DABifying Razakar

You might want to drop by the AFD, where I proposed that solution. DABifying it while the AFD it ongoing might look confusing to others. DMacks (talk) 08:55, 5 August 2024 (UTC)

Crimes against humanity category removal on Feb 14th 2024

Hello! I am reaching out to say that I've noticed several articles relating to warcrimes committed by Imperial Japan in World War 2 have been removed from their categories due to 'not being prosecuted'. I responded to this claim irt Sook Ching (here). The perpetrators of these warcrimes were persecuted across the minor trials which took place as part of the International Military Tribunal for the Far East and subsequent minor trials. These events were prosecuted for Class B and C warcriminals which qualifies them by this standard. I would appreciate your help in restoring these category tags for crimes which were prosecuted as apart of those trials. I am a relatively new editor and not entirely familiar with how to find the list to manually check them. Relm (talk) 21:49, 8 August 2024 (UTC)

Hi Relmcheatham, thanks for your comment. If an event was prosecuted as a crime against humanity (as opposed to a war crime—separate area of law), I think it would be fair to include, assuming it is a WP:DEFINING aspect of the topic—which may not be the case. (For example, the legal classification of the Srebrenica massacre as genocide is defining, but the classification of the same event as a crime against humanity is not.) However, as it is the Sook Ching article does not even mention "crimes against humanity" or "crime against humanity". Without a source, the category fails WP:VER. (t · c) buidhe 04:09, 9 August 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for the reply! I apologize since I typed that message while rather tired and conflated some things in my response in a way that was not clear. Officers involved in Sook Ching were tried as Class C war criminals - which means that they were tried for Crimes Against Humanity in the Singapore trials. I listed a source which says this. If I understand what you are saying, I would need to add that source to the Sook Ching article - presumably as part of expanding the 'trial' section to mention it. Would this be sufficient or am I missing something that would be required? Or are you saying that unless secondary sources specifically refer to Sook Ching as a crime against humanity - even if it was tried as such - that it can not be reflected in the tags? I'd love to help expand on these articles so any feedback on how to do so appropriately would be greatly appreciated! Relm (talk) 21:15, 9 August 2024 (UTC)

Looking at some of the sources already on the page, they also refer to Sook Ching as a Crime against humanity. So I think it should be easy to add even without incorporating new sources. Relm (talk) 21:18, 9 August 2024 (UTC)

I think it would be a great idea to add the information to the article, but I'm still skeptical that wp:defining is met-which also requires that "crime against humanity is what sources are consistently labeling the event (please see the categorization rules). Instead I would consider creating and populating Category:Crimes prosecuted at the Tokyo trial (t · c) buidhe 22:40, 9 August 2024 (UTC)

Notify

BM taking your name in vain at AE and neglecting to notify you, so I will do it for him. Selfstudier (talk) 18:16, 10 August 2024 (UTC)

FAR

I have nominated The Supremes for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 23:33, 10 August 2024 (UTC)

Precious anniversary

Precious

Six years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:39, 11 August 2024 (UTC)

Torture template reverts

It is not required that Hell be described on the torture article in order to have Hell listed in the template. I'm not sure what your point was regarding the "legal definition". I gave no mention of a deity. There's no definition saying Hell is limited to Earth or this current existence. While it is true that not all religions say Hell is a place of torture, this is the general viewpoint, as is prominently mentioned right near the beginning of the Hell article itself. This is not my POV. I never added such a description to the Hell article. This is the general viewpoint of what this place entails. Helper201 (talk) 18:33, 9 August 2024 (UTC)

Helper201 The scope of the template is defined in the article torture, not torture (disambiguation). (t · c) buidhe 18:35, 9 August 2024 (UTC)

Is there actually any Wikipedia guideline specifically stating a template is limited to what its related article describes? Helper201 (talk) 18:38, 9 August 2024 (UTC)

I believe that the scope of each template is determined by consensus. If there is no consensus to include the religion aspect, it will be left out. (t · c) buidhe 20:00, 9 August 2024 (UTC)

So there's actually no guideline against this. This feels like its falling under WP:OWNBEHAVIOR. Helper201 (talk) 17:45, 12 August 2024 (UTC)

WP:ONUS: "The responsibility for achieving consensus for inclusion is on those seeking to include disputed content." (t · c) buidhe 17:52, 12 August 2024 (UTC)

Per the ownership behaviour guideline - "An editor reverts a good-faith change without providing an edit summary that refers to relevant Wikipedia policies and guidelines, previous reviews and discussions, reliable sources, or specific grammar or prose problems introduced by the edit." Helper201 (talk) 20:20, 12 August 2024 (UTC)

You're welcome to seek consensus for your change. I already explained why I think it does not belong in the template. (t · c) buidhe 01:45, 13 August 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 12

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Gaza genocide, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Blockade of Gaza.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 20:01, 12 August 2024 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Tomasz Jedrowski

Hello, Buidhe. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Tomasz Jedrowski, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:05, 15 August 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 22

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited German atrocities committed against Soviet prisoners of war, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hiwi.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:52, 22 August 2024 (UTC)

New pages patrol September 2024 Backlog drive

New pages patrol | September 2024 Backlog Drive
On 1 September 2024, a one-month backlog drive for new pages patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled. Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. Each article review will earn 1 point, and each redirect review will earn 0.2 points. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:09, 26 August 2024 (UTC)

Category:Drugs by structure

Hi there - I'm hoping you can shed light on what it was you had in mind when you created Category:Drugs by structure, which I just came across. After looking through the contents, I found only 2 items that seem to have any possible reason for being placed in the category: Peptide therapeutics‎ and Small-molecule drug‎s - and honestly, I'm not sure either of them really makes sense either. Perhaps we can come up with a better name for the Category if you can explain the rationale for me? Regards, Anomalous+0 (talk) 07:55, 27 August 2024 (UTC)

PS - Please be sure to Ping me when you reply. Thanx. Anomalous+0 (talk) 07:56, 27 August 2024 (UTC)

Anomalous+0 I was trying to clean up the main drugs category by moving out subcategories that were about the structure / chemical composition rather than the function, of the drug. For example, drugs that contain deuterium or radioactive isotopes, those that are small molecules vs peptides. (t · c) buidhe 13:40, 27 August 2024 (UTC)

Voting for coordinators is now open!

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election have opened. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting will commence on 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:40, 1 September 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 7

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Substation, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Contractor and Grounding.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:52, 7 September 2024 (UTC)

Krikor Bogharian moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Krikor Bogharian. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. JoeNMLC (talk) 14:25, 7 September 2024 (UTC)

JoeNMLC, while I appreciate patrollers, the draftification is clearly inappropriate, because the article cites two scholarly sources that extensively discuss the article subject, and also support all of the content in the article. (t · c) buidhe 15:41, 7 September 2024 (UTC)

Sorry, I did not know that "Further reading" entries were sources. Thanks for letting me know. Still learning something new every day. Cheers, JoeNMLC (talk) 15:44, 7 September 2024 (UTC)

Books & Bytes – Issue 64

The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 64, July – August 2024

• The Hindu Group joins The Wikipedia Library
• Wikimania presentation
• New user script for easily searching The Wikipedia Library

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --16:34, 11 September 2024 (UTC)

Genocide article

IMO you are doing much-needed and really sterling work in 'pruning' and updating this bloated article. I hope it doesn't seem as though I'm merely 'sniping from the sidelines' while letting you do all the 'heavy lifting' (mixed metaphor?). I happily admit to knowing less about the academic aspect of the topic than you do and also to not having access to any half-decent libraries or academic sources. Pincrete (talk) 10:02, 13 September 2024 (UTC)

Pincrete no worries I appreciate your feedback on the talk page. However, I accessed most of the sources via WP:The Wikipedia Library which you should also be able to use. (t · c) buidhe 14:52, 13 September 2024 (UTC)

Philippe Petain

Hey, some editor on Wikipedia Commons opted to unilaterally close the discussion you and I were involved in regarding the current lede image for Philippe Pétain on the grounds no valid reason was given for deletion. Is that permissible? Emiya1980 (talk) 00:18, 13 September 2024 (UTC)

@Buidhe: In your post on the Rfc regarding Pétain‘s lede image, you indicated it wasn’t the first time that Yann has run roughshod over valid copyright concerns raised by other editors. If that’s the case, have you thought about reporting him to other admins? Emiya1980 (talk) 20:12, 18 September 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of LGBT in Poland for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article LGBT in Poland is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LGBT in Poland until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

--MikutoH ^talk! 22:31, 16 September 2024 (UTC)

Voting for WikiProject Military history coordinators is now open!

Voting for WikiProject Military history coordinators is now open! A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. Register your vote here by 23:59 UTC on 29 September! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:34, 18 September 2024 (UTC)

harv/sfn no-target errors in German atrocities committed against Soviet prisoners of war

Hi, in this edit to German atrocities committed against Soviet prisoners of war you introduced references to "Tooze 2017". You also introduced a source "Tooze 2018". As a result of the mis-match the article is added to Category:Harv and Sfn no-target errors. Should the sfn refs be changes to 2018, or the source changed to 2017, or should both be changed to something else? DuncanHill (talk) 22:05, 18 September 2024 (UTC)

I'll fix it when I get home (t · c) buidhe 23:12, 18 September 2024 (UTC)

Done (t · c) buidhe 01:30, 19 September 2024 (UTC)

DYK for Anti-antisemitism in Germany

On 22 September 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Anti-antisemitism in Germany, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that one researcher found that nearly a third of the people cancelled over antisemitism allegations in Germany have been Jews? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Anti-antisemitism in Germany. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Anti-antisemitism in Germany), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

—Kusma (talk) 00:03, 22 September 2024 (UTC)

story · music · places

Thank you! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:41, 22 September 2024 (UTC)

Anti-Antisemitism in Germany article

Hi, thank you for raising your concern. The wording of “Deplatforming and arrest of Jews” lacks neutrality. It risks conveying to third-country readers that there is some kind of pogroms going on in Germany against the surviving Jews. It also overlaps with “Reception” and should be combined as one for better arrangement.

I agree with you with regard to the LRB, but not the others as I would like to see credible evidence of the reliability of the figures whose claims are cited for justifying the point of view.

There is also an issue of undue weight being given to critics of “anti-antisemitism in Germany”, which appears to (1) defeat the purpose of the article (2) downplay the severity of antisemitic hate crimes in Germany as reported by the Statista [1], Politico [2] and Human Rights Watch [3]. Steven1991 (talk) 15:55, 22 September 2024 (UTC)

This article is not about " antisemitic hate crimes in Germany", there is a separate article antisemitism in Germany where that is covered. I think if you look at sources about *anti-antisemitism*, our article represents them pretty fairly—it has not been positively received by external observers. The deplatforming and arrest of Jews is an actual action by German state and institutions according to anti-antisemitism policy, so it does not belong in the reception section.

I don't mean to go into WP:NOTFORUM, but if what you're saying is that German Jews deserve better and more effective strategies for protecting them from hate crimes, I would agree 100%. (t · c) buidhe 16:11, 22 September 2024 (UTC)

I had a look. I'm glad we can put aside the concern about the London Review of Books. The other sources marked with an "Unreliable source?" tag were:

• The peer-reviewed Journal of Genocide Research
• Deutsche Welle, the German equivalent of the BBC World Service
• Die Tageszeitung, a major German national daily (traditionally associated with the Green Party)

Those sources are surely above reproach. A look at their Wikipedia articles will demonstrate this beyond a shadow of a doubt. The other two sources tagged were:

• Momus.ca, a Canadian art magazine – fine for this content, I would have thought, but now supplemented with Haaretz
• Novara Media – this one I agree is a bit weak; now replaced/supplemented with The Guardian and Berliner Morgenpost

Regards, Andreas JN466 17:33, 22 September 2024 (UTC)

DYK for Tamurbek Dawletschin

On 24 September 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Tamurbek Dawletschin, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Tamurbek Dawletschin wrote one of the only memoirs by a Soviet prisoner of war, 3 million of whom died in German captivity? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Tamurbek Dawletschin. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Tamurbek Dawletschin), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

RoySmith (talk) 00:02, 24 September 2024 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Genocide in the Hebrew Bible

Hello! Your submission of Genocide in the Hebrew Bible at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 05:06, 24 September 2024 (UTC)

DYK for Axis Rule in Occupied Europe

On 25 September 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Axis Rule in Occupied Europe, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the concept of genocide was introduced in the 1944 book Axis Rule in Occupied Europe? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Axis Rule in Occupied Europe. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Axis Rule in Occupied Europe), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

BorgQueen (talk) 00:03, 25 September 2024 (UTC)

Talk:2020 ARIA Music Awards

I would like your guidance on an issue. About four years ago, you completed a non-admin closure on a requested move of the article ARIA Music Awards of 2020, which resulted in its shift to 2020 ARIA Music Awards. Subsequent articles in the series {{year}} ARIA Music Awards have been created up to this year's version. However, prior year's awards remain in the style ARIA Music Awards of {{year}} going back to 1987's awards. Is the moving of those prior years' articles considered to be non-controversial? Or should I raise the issue somewhere?Didier Landner (talk) 06:28, 27 September 2024 (UTC)

Didier Landner I wouldn't expect too much controversy given that the date-first style is generally preferred, but to avoid any conflict I suggest listing *all of them* in a single RM. (t · c) buidhe 06:32, 27 September 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for your prompt reply. Didier Landner (talk) 06:38, 27 September 2024 (UTC)

You've got mail!

Hello, Buidhe. Please check your email; you've got mail!
Message added 16:29, 28 September 2024 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

SerialNumber54129 16:29, 28 September 2024 (UTC)

Your revert on German-atrocities

Hi - You did a revert saying you didn't see the benefit. My change (just adding two subsection headings) was to make clearer that most of the content of the After-the-war section was about Soviet actions (rather than German action as per title of article). Your revert makes it harder to navigate and understand the article IMO. - Rod57 (talk) 15:50, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

Soviet and non Soviet actions are not separated in the section and it is about actions at and after the end of the war as the section heading states (t · c) buidhe 16:13, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

DYK for Post-tuberculosis lung disease

On 1 October 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Post-tuberculosis lung disease, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that many people who recover from tuberculosis lose more than half of their lung capacity (example pictured)? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Post-tuberculosis lung disease. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Post-tuberculosis lung disease), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

RoySmith (talk) 00:02, 1 October 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 4

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Genocide, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Residential schools.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:57, 4 October 2024 (UTC)

Removal of sourced information in Genocide

Hello. You did not respond to me in the talk page Talk:Genocide#Removal_of_sourced_information [4], so I'm bringing my concern here. Why was the content I added recently deleted without any talk page discussion?

I understand you are improving the article, and you are doing great work. And I understand replacing content sometimes happens, especially if it's old or poorly sourced. But my edits were recent and sourced with high quality sources.

Should I expect all my edits reversed or deleted with mass edits such as this [5] in the future? Bogazicili (talk) 15:17, 4 October 2024 (UTC)

Genocidal intent

Hi, I fixed the reference errors which you introduced to Genocidal intent. DuncanHill (talk) 17:28, 4 October 2024 (UTC)

Slovak Republic

Why not move Slovak Republic (1939-1945) to First Slovak Republic? 91838jeu72737 (talk) 11:32, 6 October 2024 (UTC)

91838jeu72737 I'm not necessarily opposed, but you have to use the correct process by going through WP:RM and getting consensus for the move. (t · c) buidhe 13:52, 7 October 2024 (UTC)

Thank you!

		The Original Barnstar
		To Buidhe on the occasion of the Minneapolis FA being kept. Your review of images made the difference. Thank you! -SusanLesch (talk) 17:49, 6 October 2024 (UTC)

History of Christianity

I have finally nominated the article. Please take a look if you can: Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/History of Christianity/archive1. Thank you! Jenhawk777 (talk) 18:30, 1 October 2024 (UTC)

I think I have addressed all that you mentioned. Would you mind taking another look? Your input is invaluable to me. Jenhawk777 (talk) 20:05, 10 October 2024 (UTC)

"Alison Chabloz" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Alison Chabloz has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 October 8 § Alison Chabloz until a consensus is reached. Launchballer 09:39, 8 October 2024 (UTC)

Dispute against EU Reporter reliability

@Buidhe I believe we should start a noticeboard discussion about EU Reporter. You seem to be strongly against it, but you are the only wiki editor that I am aware that has such a strong negative view against EU Reporter. There are quotes from this news website in Ukranian government websites: [6], [7]; Azerbaijani government websites [8]; Croatian goverment websites [9]; and others. Are you telling that all these goverments are trying to manipulate the news or they are naive enough to use unreliable sources for their official reporting? Do you have any other indication of Wikipedia consensus on the unreliability of this source other than your own research? Contributor892z (talk) 19:59, 20 October 2024 (UTC)

The source has been documented to publish native advertising, which means that you cannot trust that anything you read there is not a paid for ad. It is untrue that consensus is needed to deem a source unreliable—those adding a source have the burden of proving that it is a reliable source. (t · c) buidhe 20:05, 20 October 2024 (UTC)

The documentation you mentioned was made by a rival source in 2021 and since then EU Reporter has been subject to independent editorial control by NewsGuard, yet you still were uncomfortable of a reference to an article published there in 2022. Even based on your own argument, the independent editorial control by a rating system that is used globally is a proof that post-2021 this is a reliable source. Contributor892z (talk) 20:12, 20 October 2024 (UTC)

It's not proof of anything, given that "There is a rough consensus in this thread that NewsGuard is not a reliable source." A source has to spend time building a reputation for fact checking and accuracy, if it lacks this in 2021 it is unlikely to be RS a year later. (t · c) buidhe 20:17, 20 October 2024 (UTC)

Important: Please update user script installation

Hi there, you currently have a user script installed from Anne drew Andrew and Drew. Several weeks ago, I changed my username to Anne drew, and unfortunately, due to an issue with script redirects, the scripts you have installed under my old username no longer function.

To fix this, please update your JavaScript pages (Special:MyPage/common.js or Special:MyPage/skin.js) by replacing all instances of Anne drew Andrew and Drew with Anne drew.

If any of this is unclear, please ping Anne drew for help. I apologize for the inconvenience and appreciate your understanding!

Thanks – Anne drew

You are receiving this message because you have installed one of Anne drew's user scripts. If you'd like to stop receiving notifications, you can unsubscribe here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:11, 24 October 2024 (UTC)