Calyx2s

Overlink

Hey, Welcome to Wikipedia! I am about to revert a few of your edits. Have a read of MOS:OVERLINK. And you need to read MOS:DATE also. Doctorhawkes (talk) 00:06, 15 September 2023 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello, Calyx2s, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction and Getting started
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help. Need some ideas about what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Doctorhawkes (talk) 00:05, 15 September 2023 (UTC)

Tupocracy

You repeat the definition. Xx236 (talk) 09:18, 15 September 2023 (UTC)

Xx236 Thank you, for bringing it to my noticed. I have tried to adjust, I hope is better now? High regards Calyx2s (talk) 10:40, 17 September 2023 (UTC)

Xx236, I hope I attended to your corrections? And please can you review it aswell. Thanks. Calyx2s (talk) 20:49, 26 September 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Tupocracy

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Tupocracy requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tupocracy. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 08:55, 27 September 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Tupocracy

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Tupocracy requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tupocracy. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. voorts (talk/contributions) 23:22, 6 October 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tupocracy (November 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Vanderwaalforces was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tupocracy and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Vanderwaalforces (talk) 21:54, 1 November 2023 (UTC)

Hello, Calyx2s! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Vanderwaalforces (talk) 21:54, 1 November 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tupocracy (November 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Vanderwaalforces was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tupocracy and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Vanderwaalforces (talk) 15:22, 8 November 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tupocracy has been accepted

Tupocracy, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Vanderwaalforces (talk) 15:46, 8 November 2023 (UTC)

Levi B. Kaler

Thanks for your edit to Levi B. Kaler. It's common to include the full name of someone in the first sentence of the body of the article (after the lead); see Abraham Lincoln, Mahatma Gandhi, Drew Barrymore. This helps cite the full name appropriately (and when necessary). --Engineerchange (talk) 17:48, 24 December 2023 (UTC)

Ok, noted. Thanks Calyx2s (talk) 18:00, 24 December 2023 (UTC)

Call me sir Umng yadav (talk) 17:31, 21 April 2024 (UTC)

Am umang yadav talk me Umng yadav (talk) 17:30, 21 April 2024 (UTC)

@Umng yadav:, kindly write what you wish to discuss or talk about here Calyx2s (talk) 23:12, 11 May 2024 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Calyx2s. Thank you for your work on JOM Charity Award. Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Good start

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 13:44, 28 April 2024 (UTC)

@North8000: Thank you for the positive compliment after your review on article I created. I have been following you for a little while now, would kindly request if you can mentor me. Calyx2s (talk) 10:41, 11 May 2024 (UTC)

Happy to, though I may not have enough wiki-minutes to do a thorough job. Just ping me when moments for that arise. Sincerely, North8000 (talk) 16:51, 11 May 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Gbenga Adigun for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gbenga Adigun is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gbenga Adigun until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

LocomotiveEngine (talk) 15:15, 14 May 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of JOM Charity Award for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article JOM Charity Award is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/JOM Charity Award until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

LocomotiveEngine (talk) 15:48, 14 May 2024 (UTC)

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely as an undisclosed paid editor, and also for personal attacks and general unreasonableness. Your attacks on critics of your articles in the AfD discussions Articles for deletion/Gbenga Adigun and Articles for deletion/JOM Charity Award make you, not them, look bad, with statements like "I feel you and the nominator might be using this account to discredit the article because I could see the desperation to discredit it" (very unclear; I can't work out what, or who, "this account" refers to); "The desperation is making it seem as if he has been paid for it to bring the article down..."); "The nominator looks so desperate instead of allowing the editors to access the sources themselves and votes". Such irrational accusations are typical of undisclosed paid editors. Why, exactly, would some experienced Wikipedia editors be "desperate" to discredit your articles? Have you considered that? And would you like to explain it to me? Also, please explain in what kind of scenario somebody would pay to have the article 'brought down'. If you are able to give logical reasons why such things might happen, I will reconsider the block. Alternatively, you can request unblock from an uninvolved administrator by placing {{unblock|your reason here}} on this page. Bishonen | tålk 22:00, 21 May 2024 (UTC).