"""CdaMVvWgS"""

CdaMVvWgS

edit

CdaMVvWgS is the short name for a german club called Club der am Montag Vormittag vom Wahnsinn getriebenen Schüler (in English: Club of pupils who are crazy on Monday afternoon)

On the homepage (click here) you can get a free membership and lots of information about geography. And: you can download Poisoned for free! So, why you don't have a look at it? Only problem: it's all written in variated german (swiss german, variation of Basel)


Hello there CdaMVvWgS, welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you ever need editing help visit Wikipedia:How does one edit a page or how to format them visit our manual of style. Experiment at Wikipedia:Sandbox. If you need pointers on how we title pages visit Wikipedia:Naming conventions. If you have any other questions about the project then check out Wikipedia:Help or add a question to the Village pump. If you ever think a page or image should be deleted, please list it at the votes for deletion page. There is also a votes for undeletion page if you want to retrieve something that you think should not have been deleted.

It might be a good idea to write a little bit more then just the definition of a term, as we already have quite a lot of these stubs. It did just finish to enlarge the articles of the districts of Nauru to a size which make them more worth to keep. If you write such short articles you should at least add the stub warning boilerplate. andy 22:42, 27 Nov 2003 (UTC)

Hi, I noticed that you left a message at Image talk:Raaflaub.jpg asking for it to be deleted. Please list it at Wikipedia:Images for deletion if you still want it deleted. Perhaps you should wait until you understand these deletion processes a bit more before applying for adminship? Angela. 21:57, Feb 22, 2004 (UTC)

Pronunciation of Basle

edit

At http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?book=Dictionary&va=basle you will find that the older English pronunciation which corresponds to the older spelling is [ba:l] rather than [ba:sl] (which is what you wrote) or [ba:zl] which is the more modern English rendering corresponding to the endonymic spelling. --Akkolon 09:59, 30 May 2004 (UTC)Reply

Nauru election

edit

Thanks for your message. I got the figures for the last Nauru election from an American diplomat in Fiji who sent them to me. I don't know if I'll be able to contact him again. If you have any sources in Nauru please let me know. Adam 14:59, 3 Oct 2004 (UTC)

I don't now recall his name or address, except that he was at the US Embassy in Fiji. Apparently they monitor elections in the Pacific. Adam 23:03, 3 Oct 2004 (UTC)

I also know someone at the Australian National University who specialises in the Pacific and has sent me election statistics from Vanuatu in the past. I will ask him if he has any sources for Nauru. Adam 09:22, 4 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Yes, I have any knowledge about this pretty country (not so many as you of course), but I am very interested in Nauru, Kiribati, Palau, Tuvalu, , Italy, Belgium and Moldova. Belgian man 18:45, 4 Oct 2004 (UTC)

PS: Maybe have you seen my contributions at the German wiki (for link: go to my page), but I am not sure they are good ==> I speak German very bad...


Re Nauru elections, thanks very much, the results will be at my website soon. If you tell me your name I will of course credit you for supplying them to me. Adam 23:37, 28 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Baseldytsch Wikipedia

edit
Answer to first dot: No. Best proposal should be bds.wikipedia.org. Reasons you will get there. Answer to second dot: My proposal is to language of Basel-Town (the language of Basel-Land is not as especially as the Baseldytsch to have any reasons for a own wikipedia, as the Baseldytsch does...) -- CdaMVvWgS 23:00, 9 Nov 2004 (UTC)

The problem with Nauruan

edit

The problem with the Nauruan wikipedia and wiktionary is, that MANY people have the feeling that it is not Nauruan but something else. One thing that is telling is that for the Nauruan word for Nauruan "Nauruose" only can be found on wikipedia.

The fact that you are from Switserland, does also not provide us with confidence that these sites have not been squatted. So plain and simple there is a need of some objective proof that the information on the na: wiktipedia and wiktionary IS in the Nauruan language.

Thanks, GerardM 18:43, 9 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Maybe you should check Google.com and search for "nauruan dictionary", there you'll find a link to trussel.com which contains a big nauruan-english-german dictionary. Then you should have the proof for the correctness of the nauruan wikipedia/wiktionary contents. Greets -- CdaMVvWgS 22:56, 9 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Hello, CdaMVvWgS. You have today asked a question on my User Talk Page. I did do half a dozen small anonymous edits in the Nauru WP (though some of my "edit summaries" hinted that it was me), using words that were already there (not trying to check them in any way). Then I decided to simplify things by signing up properly. I think everything I've done since then has had my name on it (and I know I've used no Maori words). I remember noting (after a dig through some page histories) that someone was abusively (and unconstructively) criticising the alleged use of non-Nauruan words. So I checked some of those "trussel" pages and created links to them, to make it easier for you and me and anyone else to do a quick check if in doubt. The "trussell" looks to me to be more reliable than the recent contributor who complains that everything is wrong but does not bother to fix any or to tell the rest of us what is wrong. We shall see if anyone responds to my request that the mistakes (if any) be fixed up. I've repeated, on na:User_talk:Belgian_man, what we all seem to agree about. Kind regards. (I don't remember seeing the Nauruan Wiktionary.) Robin Patterson 05:57, 16 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Article Licensing

edit

Hi, I've started a drive to get users to multi-license all of their contributions that they've made to either (1) all U.S. state, county, and city articles or (2) all articles, using the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (CC-by-sa) v1.0 and v2.0 Licenses or into the public domain if they prefer. The CC-by-sa license is a true free documentation license that is similar to Wikipedia's license, the GFDL, but it allows other projects, such as WikiTravel, to use our articles. Since you are among the top 2000 Wikipedians by edits, I was wondering if you would be willing to multi-license all of your contributions or at minimum those on the geographic articles. Over 90% of people asked have agreed. For More Information:

To allow us to track those users who muli-license their contributions, many users copy and paste the "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" template into their user page, but there are other options at Template messages/User namespace. The following examples could also copied and pasted into your user page:

Option 1
I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions, with the exception of my user pages, as described below:
{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}

OR

Option 2
I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions to any [[U.S. state]], county, or city article as described below:
{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}

Or if you wanted to place your work into the public domain, you could replace "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" with "{{MultiLicensePD}}". If you only prefer using the GFDL, I would like to know that too. Please let me know what you think at my talk page. It's important to know either way so no one keeps asking. -- Ram-Man (comment| talk)


Unverified images

edit

Hi! Thanks for uploading the following image:

I notice it currently doesn't have an image copyright tag. Could you add one to let us know its copyright status? (You can use {{gfdl}} if you release it under the GNU Free Documentation License, {{fairuse}} if you claim fair use, etc.) If you don't know what any of this means, just let me know at my talk page where you got the images and I'll tag them for you. Thanks so much. [[User:Poccil|Peter O. (Talk, automation script)]] 04:38, Dec 11, 2004 (UTC)

P.S. You can help tag other images at User:Yann/Untagged_Images. Thanks again.

Bob Marley

edit

Great photo. --SqueakBox 17:23, Mar 4, 2005 (UTC)

Thank you very much for your kindness! As a Swiss, I'm very proud to have in the Wikipedia a live photo with Bob Marley from his only concert he ever performed in Switzerland. Greetings -- CdaMVvWgS 20:01, 4 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Translation from Norwegian

edit

If it's not too long, I'd be happy to help you with the translation; and newspaper articles are rarely very long, so I'm sure it'll be fine. Leave me a message at my discussion page with a link to the article, or use «E-mail this user» if you have to send the article to me. Cnyborg 16:38, 27 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Image deletion warning The image Image:201346.jpg has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it will be deleted. If you have any information on the source or licensing of this image, please go there to provide the necessary information.

Burgundavia (✈ take a flight?) 09:26, May 21, 2005 (UTC)

Vote

edit

Hello CdaMVvWgS, thank you for your voting.

If I understand correctly, you voted from English Wikipedia and German Wikipedia. As you know, every voter have only one vote by person. You can vote from anywhere you have over 400 edits, but you have to choose one project from which you would vote.

I stroke the older vote from German Wikipedia and left the latest one. If you would like to change your vote again, please vote from the wiki you have voted last time.

Your reply on my meta talk page will be appreciated.

Thank you!

Aphaea* 1 July 2005 03:13 (UTC)

Image:Octagon.jpg has been listed for deletion

edit
An image or media file that you uploaded, Image:Octagon.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

This GIF version (not a JPEG) has been replaced by Image:Octagon.png.

Image:Nonagon.jpg has been listed for deletion

edit
An image or media file that you uploaded, Image:Nonagon.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

This GIF version (not a JPEG) has been replaced by Image:Nonagon.png.

Image:Decagon.jpg has been listed for deletion

edit
An image or media file that you uploaded, Image:Decagon.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

This GIF version (not a JPEG) has been replaced by Image:Decagon.svg.

Image:King aweida.jpg has been listed for deletion

edit
An image or media file that you uploaded, Image:King aweida.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

Image:Raaflaub-small.jpg and fr:Image:Raaflaub-small.jpg

edit

Hello, could you tell who is the photographer, and when he gave his agreement to release it under GFDL ? Without such precisions, I'm afraid we'll have to delete this picture. --Teofilo talk 09:27, 17 February 2006 (UTC)Reply

Afternoon?

edit

Hi, you write that CdaMVvWgS translates to "Club of pupils who are crazy on Monday afternoon", but Vormittag is really morning, isn't it? Or is this mistranslation just the result of your Wahnsinn? --128.139.226.37 19:45, 23 February 2006 (UTC)Reply

The club used to be called "...on Monday afternoon" but is now called "...on Monday morning", you're right. I'll correct it if I don't forget to do so... Thanks and greetings -- CdaMVvWgS 19:59, 23 February 2006 (UTC)Reply

Nauru images

edit

Hi, I was hoping that you would be able to add some information on why the images you have on photobucket and that have subequently have been uploaded to the commons are PD. Are they yours or did you get permission to use them from someone? Thanks--nixie 05:11, 5 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

Hi there, all images in the Nauru section have permission to be used as PD. I got the permission a while ago by some kind users of www.nr (which unfortunately doesn't exist anymore). Greetings -- CdaMVvWgS 18:20, 5 May 2006 (UTC)Reply
Hi. I have repeated your assertion above at Commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Nauru-phosphatefields.jpg.   — Jeff G. ツ 00:39, 18 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Nauru

edit

I am glad to have helped your fine articles. Let me know if there's anything else that needs attention. GilliamJF 15:30, 7 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

Alright. Greetings! -- CdaMVvWgS 15:31, 7 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

Tennis walkover article

edit

Hi! I'm not really familiar with the rules and formalities of tennis, but isn't "walkover" applied to a match which didn't even start. That is, when a player forfeits/withdraws even before he/she enters the court. For example, the case of Kutuzova against Clijsters in 2006 Wimbledon. In such a case, since the match didn't even start, then it is not counted as a loss for the player who withdrew, and a win for the other player. On the other hand, the one cited in the article is related more on retirement. That is, when the match has already started and a player cannot continue. It is not really addressed as a walkover, but a retirement. For example, when Henin-Hardenne retired in the Australian Open final. In such a case, since the match started, any win-loss record or head-to-head count is affected. What I'm asking is whether there is a conflict in the title of the article versus the definition found in it. --Joey80 07:37, 30 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

To my knowledge it is also called "walkover" when a player cannot continue during the match. I've read this form many times in newspapers, for example "6:4, 2:6, 3:1 w.o.", when a player is ahead in the third set, but cannot continue due to injuries or whatever, as you said above. Likely it's also called "walkover" when a player withdraws before the match begins, but I don't know it that exactly... Greetings -- CdaMVvWgS 18:12, 30 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

Non-free use disputed for Image:Raaflaub-small.jpg

edit
  This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Raaflaub-small.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 00:07, 6 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Non-free use disputed for Image:Our Airline Logo.gif

edit
  This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Our Airline Logo.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:34, 6 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Swiss film

edit

Hey please add all the films you known of to List of Swiss films good work ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ "Talk"? 20:57, 28 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

edit
 
Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Image-Liricasanalasanalfabad cd.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Shell babelfish 06:39, 26 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Image:Poison.jpg listed for deletion

edit

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Poison.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Videmus Omnia Talk 17:27, 3 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Image:Aiwo.jpg

edit

Hi - I noticed you uploaded this image and it is tagged with {{GFDL-presumed}}. If you created the image, please change the tag to {{GFDL}} or another appropriate free license. If you did not create the image, or if you need help picking an appropriate license, please leave a message on my talk page. Thanks! -SCEhardT 15:55, 25 November 2007 (UTC)Reply


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:KymaniMarley-TheJourney.jpg

edit

Thanks for uploading Image:KymaniMarley-TheJourney.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:16, 2 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Il Grande Rock

edit
 

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Il Grande Rock, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Il Grande Rock. Jfire (talk) 05:36, 9 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:Lorne_Berfield_at_Masters_of_the_Maze.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Lorne_Berfield_at_Masters_of_the_Maze.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Project FMF (talk) 23:11, 31 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

edit

Thanks for uploading Image:KKB-logo.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
  • That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 00:33, 18 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Image licensing

edit

Hey there...

I am going through a number of images that have some minor licensing issues. I came across Image:Aiwo.jpg which you uploaded. The licensing on this image is not complete as it was uploaded many years ago. I wonder if you could follow the link to the image page and correct the licensing with a GFDL license (or other free license). If you have any questions or issues, please drop me a note on my talk page. Thanks. --Jordan 1972 (talk) 01:10, 29 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Gounod Ave Maria

edit

I can understand why you moved it, except for the fact that I can't see how Gounod's 'original' piece is particularly notable. There's also the fact that 99% of the time, someone searching for "Ave Maria (Gounod)" is going to want the Bach arrangement. ♫ Melodia Chaconne ♫ (talk) 23:18, 25 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Burnin' Tour

edit
 

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Burnin' Tour, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

non notable musical tour

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Stormbay (talk) 03:21, 29 January 2009 (UTC)Reply


Image permission problem with Image:Aiwo.jpg

edit
 
Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Aiwo.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the image (or other media file) agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the GFDL or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the image to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the image has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the image's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Images lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ▫ JohnnyMrNinja 18:10, 13 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free media (File:Cloudride-Overlooked.jpg)

edit

  Thanks for uploading File:Cloudride-Overlooked.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:16, 17 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free media (File:Cloudride-BehindMyGlasses.jpg)

edit

  Thanks for uploading File:Cloudride-BehindMyGlasses.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:18, 17 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free media (File:Cloudride-WhiteDoor.jpg)

edit

  Thanks for uploading File:Cloudride-WhiteDoor.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:18, 17 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Survival Tour venue question

edit

Please see Talk:Survival Tour#Philadelphia venue. Thanks. -- ToET 06:30, 9 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Citations

edit

Would you kindly provide sources when adding information that can not be trivially found on the Web, such as the birth dates for Nauruan presidents. Thanks. Mewulwe (talk) 12:51, 25 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Unreferenced BLPs

edit

  Hello CdaMVvWgS! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 15 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 139 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

  1. Terangi Adam - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  2. Dominic Tabuna - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  3. Aloysius Amwano - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  4. Rykers Solomon - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  5. Sprent Dabwido - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  6. Shadlog Bernicke - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  7. Mathew Batsiua - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  8. Landon Deireragea - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  9. Dantes Tsitsi - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  10. Godfrey Thoma - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 18:00, 17 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of European Festival of Youth Choirs

edit
 

The article European Festival of Youth Choirs has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A search for references failed to find significant coverage in reliable sources to comply with notability requirements. This included web searches for news coverage, books, and journals, which can be seen from the following links:
European Festival of Youth Choirsnews, books, scholar
Consequently, this article is about a subject that appears to lack sufficient notability.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Abductive (reasoning) 23:37, 22 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Tedmak

edit
 

The article Tedmak has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A search for references failed to find significant coverage in reliable sources to comply with notability requirements. This included web searches for news coverage, books, and journals, which can be seen from the following links:
Tedmaknews, books, scholar
Consequently, this article is about a subject that appears to lack sufficient notability.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Abductive (reasoning) 08:46, 19 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of The Glue

edit
 

The article The Glue has been proposed for deletion. The proposed-deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. UnitedStatesian (talk) 14:00, 30 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Shy (song) for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shy (song) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shy (song) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Clarityfiend (talk) 20:49, 17 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Shy (song)

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Shy (song) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article has never existed, has been deleted or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 20:51, 17 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Mundwerk

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Mundwerk requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article has never existed, has been deleted or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 22:36, 17 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Maulwurf live

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Maulwurf live requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article has never existed, has been deleted or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 22:39, 17 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Boca Juniors (album)

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Boca Juniors (album) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article has never existed, has been deleted or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 22:41, 17 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:TheGlue-Mundwerk.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:TheGlue-Mundwerk.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 05:04, 21 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:TheGlue-Shy.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:TheGlue-Shy.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 05:04, 21 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:TheGlue-BOCAJUNIORS.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:TheGlue-BOCAJUNIORS.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 05:04, 21 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:TheGlue-MaulwurfLive.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:TheGlue-MaulwurfLive.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 04:58, 22 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Dabwido's birth date

edit

Hi. Could you let me know how you found what Sprent Dabwido's birthdate is? And Freddie Pitcher's too, for that matter? Do you know people in Nauru, or know people who know them? I can't find any (online) source providing their birth dates. (The main reason why I ask is because I wrote the articles about them in the French Wikipedia, without birth dates because I couldn't find any source. Somebody then added them from the English Wikipedia, leading me to look and see who had first added them to the English Wiki.) If there's a verifiable source that can be referred to, that would be great; information about Nauru is fairly hard to come by! Thanks in advance. Aridd (talk) 23:16, 15 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:KKB-logo.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:KKB-logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 13:11, 21 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

Nauruan Political Parties

edit

Hi, I noticed that you made articles on the Democratic Party of Nauru and the Centre Party (Nauru). I can confirm that these parties actually exist (http://www.ciaworldfactbook.us/oceania/nauru.html), but other than that, I can't seem to find any non-Wikipedia information on it. Where did you find the information? Orthogonal1 (talk) 22:43, 30 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Principality of Freedonia for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Principality of Freedonia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Principality of Freedonia (4th nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Dinkytown talk 22:26, 8 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Alice Parker

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Alice Parker requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://melodiousaccord.org/biography. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Bgwhite (talk) 00:56, 7 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Knee (geography), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Bingen and Riverbend. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:48, 14 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Mark D. Templeton for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mark D. Templeton is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark D. Templeton until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sideways713 (talk) 21:06, 2 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open!

edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:13, 30 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

File:Logo.png listed for discussion

edit
 

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Logo.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 18:38, 6 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Patrick Metzger (musician)

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello. A tag has been placed on Patrick Metzger (musician) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. noq (talk) 08:42, 3 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Millennial Whoop

edit
 

The article Millennial Whoop has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

non notable neologism

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. noq (talk) 08:43, 3 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

edit

Hello, CdaMVvWgS. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

edit

Hello, CdaMVvWgS. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

edit

Hello, CdaMVvWgS. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

edit

Hello, CdaMVvWgS. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Chester Gill moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, Chester Gill, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. buidhe 04:18, 20 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Cloudride

edit
 

The article Cloudride has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

NN band, fails the GNG and WP:BAND. No significant coverage in reliable sources found. Notability tagged for over a decade.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ravenswing 04:36, 22 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Chester Gill

edit
 

Hello, CdaMVvWgS. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Chester Gill".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 17:22, 20 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Philip Cowen moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, Philip Cowen, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 21:32, 6 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Philip Cowen

edit

  Hello, CdaMVvWgS. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Philip Cowen, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:03, 6 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:02, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Nordic-Baltic Choral Festival

edit
 

The article Nordic-Baltic Choral Festival has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No significant coverage to meet WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 11 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Philip Cowen

edit
 

Hello, CdaMVvWgS. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Philip Cowen".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 12:08, 19 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Lux Aurumque

edit

What you added to Lux Aurumque is great but looks like original research (WP:OR). Do you have a independent source? -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:53, 5 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

The composer himself. You may compare the mentioned chords "natum" and "Qui pas-" and hear by yourself that they are identical. -- CdaMVvWgS (talk) 18:11, 5 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Ludwig Keke's partial term

edit

@CdaMVvWgS: Hello. I noticed you had a useful page which documented a lot of Nauruan parliamentary history. Thank you for making this. There is one question I had about it though: it says that in the 2nd parliament, Ludwig Keke served a partial term. I was digging through the government gazettes to find info about this, and I found the results of a by-election for the Yaren Constituency in 1972. Keke runs in this election, which does imply that he did indeed serve a partial term. Its weird that he would run however, considering he won a seat in the normal 1971 election, meaning he should have already had a seat in parliament. I wanted to ask you if you knew anything about why Keke seems to have lost his seat in the 2nd parliament and if you have any sources about it. I know this is kind of unlikely, but I would very much appreciate the help if you're able. RoundSquare (talk) 02:16, 9 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Ways to improve The Sacred Veil

edit

Hello, CdaMVvWgS,

Thank you for creating The Sacred Veil.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Hi there: you may want to add some secondary references to this article such as [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]. There's many other sources that could be used to flesh out the article: this is only a selection.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Schminnte}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Schminnte (talk contribs) 14:30, 8 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply