User talk:Chanheigeorge/Archive 10
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 5 | ← | Archive 8 | Archive 9 | Archive 10 | Archive 11 | Archive 12 | Archive 13 |
A barnstar for you!
The Original Barnstar | |
Quite informative ChrisOchy (talk) 18:39, 12 January 2014 (UTC) |
Deletion discussion about Mascom Top 8 Cup
Hello, Chanheigeorge,
I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Mascom Top 8 Cup should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mascom Top 8 Cup .
If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.
Thanks, ColonelHenry (talk) 06:33, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
The article 2016 FIFA Futsal World Cup has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Over two years away, fails WP:CRYSTAL, non-notable tournament
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GiantSnowman 20:37, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
Defoe
Oops, you're completely right. I thought Defoe left at the beginning of February; I guess I blame Tim Sherwood for that. Anyway, thanks for correcting me. --BDD (talk) 23:05, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
2014 AFC Champions League Top Scorers sorting
by what are you sorting the top scorers in the 2014 AFC Champions League? --SuperJew (talk) 20:00, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
names on shirt vs name in wiki-textbox
Hi,
I wanted to follow up on this discussion, but not start an edit war.
You wrote name on shirt irrelevant, there are players who put nicknames on their shirt like "Kun" for Sergio Aguero, general name conventions should be followed
1. Isn't the naming convention for South Koreans outside of the K-League to use their family name? (such as Park Ji-Sung who is written as Park). So in this case it would be Nam.
2. About the nicknames. All the Brazilian players who have shirts with one name and are written in wiki-boxes with one name - those are nicknames, such as Ronaldinho, Ronaldo, and Fred.
2013–14 UEFA Champions League draw
Hi, I juaat wanted to let you know I was planing to update the schedule on 2013–14 UEFA Champions League directly after all teams are drawn (and also main article for EL). Thought you should know so that we dont update same article. Perhaps you can focus on knockout stages subarticle? You can update everything you want I was just thinking that if we focus on one artile each it might go smoother and faster. QED237 (talk) 10:46, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
DYK for UEFA Nations League
On 15 April 2014, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article UEFA Nations League, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the proposed UEFA Nations League will largely replace friendly matches for UEFA member nations? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/UEFA Nations League. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
Sliema Wanderers
[1] why only if they win the league? Isn't it if they qualify for Europe via their league position (i.e. 1st–3rd), which has been decided? - filelakeshoe (t / c) 07:42, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
Redirect Seko Fofana
Hello. I've removed the PROD and restored the redirect. A redirect doesn't need substantial content, and the targeted article does mention the subject, so a person looking for the subject could be redirected there. If you really believe that the article should be deleted, you can bring it up at WP:RFD, but I doubt that it'll get too much support. Also, for future reference, please do not blank the article when you nominate it for WP:PROD. KJ «Click Here» 03:00, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
UEFA Euro 2016 bids and UEFA Euro 2012 bids! They say nothing about the "expressions of interest". Bids and withdrawing bids. (talk • contribs) 16:55, 27 April 2014 (UTC)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a search with the contents of 2016 CAF Champions League, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: 2015 CAF Champions League. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.
It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. CorenSearchBot (talk) 09:04, 30 April 2014 (UTC)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a search with the contents of 2016 CAF Confederation Cup, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: 2015 CAF Confederation Cup. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.
It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. CorenSearchBot (talk) 09:17, 30 April 2014 (UTC)
Hull City
Hi. Hull City have qualified for the 2014–15 UEFA Europa League, as they will play Champions League-qualified Arsenal in the final of the 2013–14 FA Cup. Best regards, --►Cekli829 12:23, 12 May 2014 (UTC)
May 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to 2014 CAF Confederation Cup qualifying rounds may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page(Click show ⇨)
|
---|
|
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:47, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
Previous FIFA World Cup meetings
Hi mate. Which editors have you spoken to about the "Previous meetings" sections in the 2014 World Cup group articles? As far as I can tell, it was only User:Jas39 and myself who expressed any opinion on the subject when it was raised on the talk page, and on the whole, our opinions were both negative. After all, previous meetings between the teams in a group really have no bearing on their clashes this time around; the only relevant one I can see is that Spain and the Netherlands met in the 2010 final, but that is such a freak occurrence that it would get mentioned in the prose match report anyway (I assume all 64 matches will have at least some prose describing the events?). – PeeJay 10:24, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 15
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2014 FIFA World Cup Group B, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Matthew Ryan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:51, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 2
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2014–15 UEFA Europa League qualifying phase and play-off round, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Paul McLaughlin (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
African football task force
I'm pushing for the creation of an African football task force at WikiProject Football given the recent spike in articles regarding African football competitions and their seasons. Would be great if you went there and signed up given the work you've done on such articles. Davykamanzi → talk • contribs • alter ego 17:58, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
July 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to OFC U-20 Women's Championship may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- The '''OFC U-20 Women's Championship''' (previously the '''OFC Women's Under 20 Qualifying Tournament''' is a tournament held every two
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 10:55, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
Pre-2004/05 UEFA Cup season style
Hi Chanheigeorge. I'm trying to bring one of the old UEFA Cup season articles (the 2002–03 UEFA Cup, to be precise) up to the standard of the most recent UEFA Europa League. However, this season was before the competition format changed to include an extended qualifying phase, the group stage and a distinct knockout phase. In 2002–03, there were only seven knockout rounds (including a qualifying round) up to the final. Point is, when I need to create subsidiary pages with the detailed results and draw seeding of the different rounds of the competition, how should I do?
- Create a page for each individual round? (I think it's going overboard)
- Create a page encompassing all rounds? (Too heavy!)
- Create a page for the qualifying round and another for the remaining rounds?
- Use UEFA's (weird) clustering: qualifying phase (from qualifying up to the last 16) and knockout phase (quarterfinals up to the final)?
One coincidence I noticed in the clustering approach mentioned in 4. is that team seeding is used in every draw up until the last 16 round. But I don't know if this is a reason to follow this approach in the way we divide the competition results in subsidiary pages. I would really appreciate your input on this subject, because any decision taken would also be applied to other season articles. Regards. Parutakupiu (talk) 00:52, 24 August 2014 (UTC)
- I think your three-page division plan might work, as it seems to divide evenly the total number of participating teams and fixtures. For now, I'm assembling everything in my userspace, so I can juggle with the several options and see which one might be the better one. One other thing: in terms of article naming, 1. and 2. are obvious (2002–03 UEFA Cup qualifying round and 2002–03 UEFA Cup first and second round), but what about 3.? 2002–03 UEFA Cup knockout phase? Parutakupiu (talk) 15:54, 24 August 2014 (UTC)
Wikilinking
Hi, and thanks for your work on the English Wikipedia.
I noticed an article you worked on. Just a short note to point out that we don’t normally link:
- dates
- years
- commonly known geographical terms (including well-known country-names), and
- common terms you’d look up in a dictionary (unless significantly technical).
This applies to infoboxes, too.
Thanks, and my best wishes.
UNCAF
All member nations get to enter without having to go through qualification. Therefore saying that all member nations entered in the intro is sufficient as you'll get to see all the teams listed in the group stage section. So yes, having a section just to list the teams is redundant!! "UNCAF" is also wikilinked, therefore if a reader still feels the need to know more, they can click on that and know more about UNCAF including it's member nations! Mas y mas (talk) 22:26, 10 September 2014 (UTC) Hah! Nice of you not to reply! Look at me, I'm Chanheigeorge, I don't reply to people when I know I'm right. Mas y mas (talk) 20:01, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
UEFA Youth League
Keep up the good work. SLBedit (talk) 17:48, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
Reference Errors on 21 September
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
- On the 2013–14 Linafoot page, your edit caused a cite error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:52, 22 September 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 20
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2014–15 OFC Champions League, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ba. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:25, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
Invitation
Thank you for your contributions to women's football/soccer articles. I thought I'd let you know about the Women's Football/Soccer Task Force (WP:WOSO), a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of women's football/soccer. If you would like to participate, join by visiting the Members page. Thanks! |
Disambiguation link notification for October 28
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2015 CONCACAF U-17 Championship qualifying, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kingston. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:27, 28 October 2014 (UTC)
November 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Nigeria Premier League may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- | current = [[2014 Nigeria Professional Football League]
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:00, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
Entering Champions League 2015/16 qualification play-off for Europa League 2014/15 title holders
Hello, I did some contributions to the page "2015–16 UEFA Champions League" under IP's 84.109.107.226 and 37.142.40.142. I'd like to discuss with you the headline, signed above. Frankly, it's not confirmed by any source, that if Europa League title holders are domestic champions of association 13-54 they enter anyway Champions Route play-off round. It is only a suggestion, that we accepted. According to the recently published "UEFA Access List 2015–16 with explanations" (ref. No.3 on the page) the section (Route) they enter depends first of all on whether the Champions League title holders themselves came from association 13-54(not clear necessarily as domestic champions or not), although with an assumption, that Europa League title holders have not qualified for Champions League. Anyway it is not defined perfectly there. The common sense says it isn't fair to pull the Europa League title holders as champions of association 13-54 out from the relatively easy Champions Route and put'em against monsters of "Big Five" leagues in League Route play-off round. Do we have to leave it meanwhile as is and wait for the "Regulations of the UEFA Champions League: 2015-18 cycle" to be published officially by UEFA? What do you think? Pahtakor (talk) 13:36, 12 November 2014 (UTC)
2015–16 UEFA Champions League
Hi! I need your opinion. My last contribution to the page 2015–16 UEFA Champions League have been undone by the user Qed237 without any explanation. I think the contribution does not deserve to be undone completely. Is it OK for you? If you do like the summary I did, can you revert it back? Or should I do it myself?Pahtakor (talk) 03:43, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
- He replied the wikitable added was messy and hard to understand. I may suppose the table is not perfect, especially in terms of the legend. But, for me, unlike the text (above) it covers all the cases possible and may be useful for readers who find difficulty to derive specific team(s) moves from the too general textual theses. Is the table really so doubtful and superfluous, in your opinion? Is it worth trying to improve the table and publish again in the future?Pahtakor (talk) 14:54, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
- It's not easy to simplify reflection of complicated issues like these, but i'll keep trying. Hopefully with publishing of the new CL regulations the things will be more clear and easy for implementation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pahtakor (talk • contribs) 23:02, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
- I hope I'm not annoying you too much. I've simplified the table. But at first I'd like you to throw a glance on it. You can do it at my sandbox (via contibs). I do feel it should be added to the page. Expecting for your feedback.Pahtakor (talk) 00:37, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
- @Chanheigeorge I see, you are very busy with editing numerous pages, so I added the improved table to the page again. You are welcome to see it there. Now I am waiting for the tournament regulations one day in the spring.84.109.107.226 (talk) 22:39, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
- @Chanheigeorge So all our contributions to this beloved Distribution section are recycled by users, displeased by the text space it took. What do you think about picking all that stuff out to a separate article which will be opened by clicking a hyperlink from the root section?Pahtakor (talk) 14:57, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
- @Chanheigeorge I see, you are very busy with editing numerous pages, so I added the improved table to the page again. You are welcome to see it there. Now I am waiting for the tournament regulations one day in the spring.84.109.107.226 (talk) 22:39, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
- I hope I'm not annoying you too much. I've simplified the table. But at first I'd like you to throw a glance on it. You can do it at my sandbox (via contibs). I do feel it should be added to the page. Expecting for your feedback.Pahtakor (talk) 00:37, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
- It's not easy to simplify reflection of complicated issues like these, but i'll keep trying. Hopefully with publishing of the new CL regulations the things will be more clear and easy for implementation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pahtakor (talk • contribs) 23:02, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 5 | ← | Archive 8 | Archive 9 | Archive 10 | Archive 11 | Archive 12 | Archive 13 |