Welcome!

edit
Hello, Charlie150408! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking   if shown; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Footwarrior (talk) 22:32, 7 August 2010 (UTC)Reply
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines

The community

Writing articles
Miscellaneous

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

edit

You have received these suggestions because we are currently running a study to see if SuggestBot is helpful for newly registered Wikipedia editors. Normally SuggestBot only makes suggestions for users who ask for them explicitly on the SuggestBot request page. We will not post suggestions on your talk page again unless you ask for them. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find a complete consent form with contact information on the SuggestBot Study page.

Stubs
Latrobe Council
Tempy, Victoria
Carwarp, Victoria
Yuroke, Victoria
Merbein, Victoria
Yelta, Victoria
Monbulk, Victoria
Peter Patmore
Linga, Victoria
Big Desert Wilderness Park
Division of Forde
Merbein South, Victoria
Wargan, Victoria
Murrayville, Victoria
Pirlta, Victoria
Nichols Point, Victoria
Ballarat East, Victoria
Division of Leichhardt
Glenorchy, Tasmania
Cleanup
Tasmania
Warrnambool, Victoria
St Arnaud, Victoria
Merge
Southern Cross Media Group
Bairnsdale Airport
Faith school
Add Sources
Ouyen, Victoria
Wymlet, Victoria
George Chaffey
Wikify
Minimay, Victoria
Brian Walters
Geelong Independent
Expand
TDT (TV station)
Police officer
Television ratings in Australia

SuggestBot picks the articles you might be interested in based on the articles you've edited and using a number of different techniques: following links from them to other articles, matching articles based on their content, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedia users. It tries to recommend only articles that others have marked as needing work, such as stub articles that need to be made longer, clean-up articles that need writing help, and so on. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you choose to participate we encourage you to leave feedback on these suggestions, which you can most easily do here by editing your user talk page. We'll stop by later to read them.

Regards, Nettrom (talk), project researcher and SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 15:43, 10 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

September 2010

edit

  Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Sale, Victoria. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Bidgee (talk) 07:45, 20 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

January 2012

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Albury, please cite a reliable source for your addition. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Bleakcomb (talk) 11:02, 22 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

 

Your recent editing history at Albury shows that you are in danger of breaking the three-revert rule, or that you may have already broken it. An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Breaking the three-revert rule often leads to a block.

If you wish to avoid being blocked, instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. You may still be blocked for edit warring even if you do not exceed the technical limit of the three-revert rule if your behavior indicates that you intend to continue to revert repeatedly. Bidgee (talk) 12:28, 22 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

You have been reported to the edit warring noticeboard for the edit warring and the threat to sock. Bidgee (talk) 13:00, 22 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Re: Your latest edit to Albury

edit

Re: this edit. First of all, please calm down. Threatening to create a new account is counterproductive and will only get you blocked. Please discuss your changes on the talk page. Edit warring is detrimental to the encyclopedia, please seek consensus on the talk page before making the change again. Regards, -- Luk talk 12:54, 22 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of a day for edit warring, as you did at Albury. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Salvio Let's talk about it! 13:15, 22 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Discuss what you want to do on Talk:Albury and wait for a consensus before editing the article again. Continuing to edit-war will just get you blocked, again. -- Donald Albury 11:53, 24 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, talk pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments, as you did at Talk:Albury, is considered bad practice, even if you meant well. Even making spelling and grammatical corrections in others' comments is generally frowned upon, as it tends to irritate the users whose comments you are correcting. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. SMS Talk 05:03, 25 January 2012 (UTC)Reply