EverDissever
Welcome!
editHello, Christian B Martin, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
- Introduction and Getting started
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article
- Simplified Manual of Style
You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! <--- That's a canned message up to this sentence, but I am a real editor and I do want to welcome you. I see you have been active for a while already, but I think no one has welcomed you before, and I am inserting this note at the top of your current Talk page. I noticed you from your edits at your new article John Neilson (c.1770 - 1827), because I got notification from it linking to an article or two that I created previously, and/or from other edits. Hey, John Neilson sounds like an interesting guy, and I hope you will continue to develop that article!
By the way, and it is not a big thing, but you should usually not indicate that your edits are "minor", as in your most recent edits. In practice, tagging as "minor" is used for when we simply make a spelling correction or the like, not when any content is being added. Hey, it is really hard to get started at Wikipedia. Most new editors encounter too many rules and adversarial others' edits, when it is impossible to know all the written and unwritten rules in advance. The only way to learn is to forge ahead; I hope it will work out for you. I'll "watchlist" here, but feel free to contact me at any time at my Talk page to call my attention to here or otherwise. Cheers, --doncram 22:10, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Thanks Doncram for the advice, particularly as regards the "Minor edit" indication. I reviewed the rules for this and then went through my contributions. Yikes! While many were appropriately "minor," many others were not (e.g. where I added a source and thought it was "minor"). I will be more careful going forward. Christian B Martin (talk) 10:23, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
June 2016
edit
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to List of UFC champions has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- For help, take a look at the introduction.
- The following is the log entry regarding this message: List of UFC champions was changed by Christian B Martin (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.883484 on 2016-06-03T08:50:31+00:00 .
Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 08:50, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
March 2017
editOh John from Idegon, it's not like he didn't already know you are an asshole, removing every entry of it won't change the fact. 82.30.110.20 (talk) 01:25, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
A page you started (John Neilson (c.1770 - 1827)) has been reviewed!
editThanks for creating John Neilson (c.1770 - 1827), Christian B Martin!
Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Thanks for creating this. Can you please WP:INLINECITE this? No one else will be able to easily do so, and without it, this can't get Good Article status and will be less useful to readers. Thanks again.
To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
edit
Hello, Christian B Martin. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Thank you for creating Shrine Mont. Would you mind adding in-line references please?Zigzig20s (talk) 22:39, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
edit Hello, Christian B Martin. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
edit| | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
edit| | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Disambiguation link notification for January 26
editHi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited I Am (poem), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Showtime. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:21, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
edit| | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
You sent me, from Wikipedia, the following email:
"this is how it is described in reliable sources"
LOL
Editors like you have utterly destroyed the integrity of Wikipedia.
Im sorry you feel that following reliable sources has destroyed Wikipedia. But you do not need to email me about it. Thanks, nableezy - 12:44, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
- Nobody but the partisan clowns that run Wikipedia believe its list of "reliable" sources is in fact "reliable." All but a few of its major sources are completely ideological, and not just quietly so, but in the most obvious of ways. This utter LACK of reliability of Wikipedia's sources is boringly apparent to every reasonable outside observer. And unfortunately, what began as a wonderful enterprise is now a joke... Christian B Martin (talk) 17:08, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
October 2022
edit Hello, I'm LilianaUwU. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to St. Louis gun-toting incident—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. LilianaUwU (talk / contribs) 02:57, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
- "Constructive?" Nine people chose to LEAVE the march route and TRESPASS on private property. They were in fact cited for trespassing, you dingbat. What would be constructive is if you would educate yourself and not try to correct elders who are far wiser and more logical than you. Christian B Martin (talk) 03:03, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
- What would be constructive is if you kept no personal attacks in mind. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 03:22, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
- Ok dingbat... 2600:8806:3305:F000:7024:FC80:81EE:D730 (talk) 05:24, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
- What would be constructive is if you kept no personal attacks in mind. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 03:22, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bishonen | tålk 10:30, 20 October 2022 (UTC)- Also, please indicate whether you have a connection with the IP 2600:8806:3305:F000:7024:FC80:81EE:D730 that posted above. Bishonen | tålk 10:31, 20 October 2022 (UTC).
- No connection to 2600:8806:3305:F000:7024:FC80:81EE:D730... Christian B Martin (talk) 12:46, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
- As long as Wikipedia continues to be run by agenda-driven partisans (who live to cancel "unwoke" long time contributors), Wikipedia will never be an "encyclopedia." Don't kid yourself... Christian B Martin (talk) 12:45, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
EverDissever (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
over 500 contributions Christian B Martin (talk) 08:49, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Decline reason:
This is not an unblock request. If you want to be unblocked, please speak to the reasons for the block, which include your personal attacks. You also should consider limiting your editing to topic areas that arouse less passion in you. If you are unable to do that, then you should remain blocked. 331dot (talk) 09:00, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.