Welcome!

Hello, CoML, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like HMAP, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted (if it hasn't already).

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 17:11, 4 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion of HMAP

edit
 

A tag has been placed on HMAP requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 17:11, 4 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

March 2009

edit

  If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

  1. editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
  2. participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors;
  3. linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam); and,
  4. avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for businesses. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see our conflict of interest guidelines. Thank you. —Largo Plazo (talk) 17:50, 4 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Census of Marine Life

edit

I would urge you to stop editing for a moment and ensure you are familiar with some of our policies as supplied to you in the messages above. Particularly important are Conflict of interest and NPOV. You also need to read up on the use of edit summaries. A lot of the changes you have made to this article are not in keeping with our guidelines on article creation as far as tone and notability and verifiability of facts. Also be aware of introducing original research. Please engage in discussion with other editors on article talk. You should also change your username as it does not comply with our guidelines, being representative of an organization. Any questions please ask. Mfield (talk) 21:00, 4 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Biogeography of Deep-Water Chemosynthetic Ecosystems, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a copy from {{{url}}}, and therefore a copyright violation. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under allowance license, then you should do one of the following:

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Biogeography of Deep-Water Chemosynthetic Ecosystems saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! — madman bum and angel 20:26, 20 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Don't be put off!

edit

I just wanted to encourage you to come back and contribute to Wikipedia.

Editors and admins can sometimes be a bit overzealous when it comes to apparent copyright infringement and bias, simply because the overwhelming majority of copied material is placed by users without the appropriate privilege. Automatic search bots have been set up that detect blocks of material that exist elsewhere on the web, and the material is then flagged for a human to investigate and put forward for deletion. 99% of the time this is the correct action, and it helps keep Wikipedia legal and neutral.

Despite this and some of the comments you've received, we really do need individuals like yourself with current detailed information to contribute to some of these articles. For commercial organisations, and those with a competitive agenda (be it monetary or political) self-edits are generally bad. In the case of an organisation like CoML though, I would argue it is not bad - in fact it's likely that only members inside the organisation will have quick access to the relevant verifiable sources of information. The key to avoid conflict is to provide references for information added - generally anything that appeared in a recognised peer-reviewed publication is perfect and will not normally be disputed.

Wikipedia has a rule that goes largely forgotten - that all rules are flexible. (I paraphrase - it's a few years since I read it in its original form, but believe me it's there. The basic premise is that good sense usually takes precedence over written rules.)

So... unless you're already editing under a different account, please feel welcome to resume your contribution to these articles. If you want to add text for which you have copyright permission, feel free to reference it in the edit summary.

Dan Pope (talk) 04:08, 11 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

File:ArcOD Logo 440x440.JPG listed for deletion

edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:ArcOD Logo 440x440.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Kelly hi! 23:12, 25 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Chesslogo.JPG

edit
 

A tag has been placed on File:Chesslogo.JPG requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused duplicate or lower-quality copy of another file on Wikipedia having the same file format, and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Jon Kolbert (talk) 17:49, 1 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

File permission problem with File:ChEss logo.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:ChEss logo.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{permission pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. Here is a list of your uploads. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:55, 18 March 2023 (UTC)Reply